Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 9;10:1251915. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1251915

Table 3.

Network SWOT analysis—strengths and weaknesses.

Competence network Long COVID Rhein-Neckar Long COVID network Ludwigsburg
Strengths (internal) What strengths do we have as a network?
Characteristics
  • - multidisciplinary-multispecialty networking with personal contacts

  • - intersectoral approach

  • - Network competence

Collaboration
  • - regional, familiar exchange

  • - concrete interactions

  • - Limited number of stakeholders in the advisory board allows for rapid exchange

Activities
  • - Fast and regular knowledge transfer

  • - Continuing education structure

Effects on medical care
  • - Control of patient flows through more precise allocations, achievable to a limited extent/sub-area (e.g., children)

Characteristics
  • - multidisciplinary-multispecialty cooperation with therapeutic and medical members

Collaboration
  • - Working at eye level

  • - Improved exchange between physicians and therapists

Activities
  • - defined contact persons

Effects on medical care
  • - Appointments through the network more quickly

  • - Specialist cardiology and pulmonology appointments made easier

  • - Interfaces quickly accessible

  • - Teamwork increases motivation of caregivers

Effects across health systems
  • - Self-affirmation through improved public perception

Weaknesses (internal) What weaknesses do we have as a network?
Collaboration
  • - Still too little exchange and networking

  • - Competence, but lack of concrete approaches for action and realization

  • - Specific issues remain unresolved (e.g., in the area of children/youth)

  • - Limited number of actors with regard to missing disciplines

Network participation
  • - Voluntary basis of participation

  • - Lack of remuneration for commitment

  • - Limited time commitment to the network

Effects on medical care
  • - Insufficient remuneration for medical care

  • - Patients and services do not find each other

  • - Persistent knowledge deficits resulting in underuse/misuse of (primary) health care services

Collaboration
  • - No personal meeting yet; physical meeting as a goal

Network participation
  • - Participation rates in exchanges often low

  • - Not all potential actors are reached/involved

  • - Insufficient compensation for reimbursement—high level of private involvement

Effects on medical care
  • - Network resources do not match needs

  • - Partly unmotivated referral of patients to the network or insufficient clarification of patients.

  • - Lack of feedback from the therapists in some cases

  • - High recording and bureaucratic effort especially for integrative activities