Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 22;383:e076990. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076990

Table 2.

Vaccine effectiveness and hazard ratios, with 95% confidence intervals, between covid-19 vaccination before infection and a diagnosis of post-covid-19 condition, overall and in separate analyses stratified by number of vaccine doses

Total No No (%) with PCC Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value‡ Vaccine effectiveness % (95% CI)‡
Crude Partially adjusted model* Fully adjusted model†
No vaccination 290 030 4118 (1.4) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
Any vaccination§ 299 692 1201 (0.4) 0.29 (0.27 to 0.31) 0.41 (0.38 to 0.45) 0.42 (0.38 to 0.46) <0.001 58 (54 to 62)
Separate stratified analyses
1 dose¶ 21 111 192 (0.9) 0.83 (0.72 to 0.96) 0.79 (0.68 to 0.91) 0.79 (0.68 to 0.91) 0.002 21 (9 to 32)
2 doses¶ 205 650 743 (0.4) 0.27 (0.25 to 0.29) 0.40 (0.36 to 0.45) 0.41 (0.37 to 0.45) <0.001 59 (55 to 63)
≥3 doses¶ 72 931 266 (0.4) 0.23 (0.20 to 0.26) 0.26 (0.22 to 0.31) 0.27 (0.23 to 0.32) <0.001 73 (68 to 77)

CI=confidence interval; PCC=post-covid-19 condition.

Study population included all adult (≥18 years) residents in the two largest regions of Sweden with covid-19 first registered during the study inclusion period, 27 December 2020 to 9 February 2022.

*

Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusted for age, sex, and predominant virus variant at the time of infection.

Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusted for age, sex, predominant virus variant at the time of infection, comorbidities (diabetes and cardiovascular, respiratory, and psychiatric disease), number of healthcare contacts during 2019, region of birth, education level, and employment status.

Based on fully adjusted model.

§

Including 1-5 doses.

Analysis performed versus no vaccination.