. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 23.

Published in final edited form as: Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2022 Jan 24;54(4):1064–1074. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01315-w

Table 4.

Logistic regression predicting T2 group status (benchmarks met/benchmarks not met) from T1 internalizing symptoms

	Block 1		Block 2
	ß (SE)	OR Estimate	ß (SE)	OR Estimate
Constant	− 12.56 (3.19)^*	0.00	− 14.36 (4.40)^*	.000
TOWRE	.13 (.05)^*	1.14	.15 (.06)^*	1.17
WJBR	.01 (.04)	1.00	.01 (.05)	1.00
BYI—BAIY			.01 (.03)	1.01
BYI—BDIY			.02 (.03)	1.02
BYI—BSCIY			−. 01 (.03)	1.00
MASC—PS			− .07 (.06)	0.93
MASC—HA			.16 (.06)^*	1.18
MASC—SA			.02 (.07)	1.03
MASC—SEP			− .23 (.08)^*	0.79
Model χ²	χ²(2) = 22.45, p < .001		χ²(9) = 42.19, p < .001
Hosmer & Lemeshow test	χ²(8) = 7.09, p = .527		χ²(8) = 7.44, p = .490
Nagelkerke R²	.25		.43

BYI beck youth inventory T-scores, BAIY beck anxiety inventory for youth, BDIY beck depression inventory for youth, BSCIY beck self concept inventory for youth, MASC multidimensional anxiety scale for children raw scores, PS Physical Symptoms, HA harm avoidance, SOC social anxiety, SEP separation-panic, TOWRE test of word reading efficiency, WJBR Woodcock-Johnson basic reading composite score

p < .05