Skip to main content
. 2023 May 9;46(1):72–90. doi: 10.1177/01640275231174561

Table A1.

Characteristics of the Articles on Social Participation of Older Adults with Hearing Loss.

Author(s) Year Region Design Sample [Size; Mean Age (Range)] Objective
[1] Andrade et al 2017 Europe Longitudinal, prospective correlational, data from the Survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE) 10 088; 69 (50+) Investigate how hearing loss difficulties are related to depression and social activities using a sample of 10 countries
[2] Convery et al 2018 Oceania Cross-sectional, correlational 37; 74 (52–83) Investigate the associations between self-reported hearing loss, self-management and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction
[3] Dalton et al 2003 North America Cross-sectional, correlational, data from the 5-year follow-up of the epidemiology of hearing loss study (EHLS-2) 2688; 69 (53–97) Investigate the impact of hearing loss on quality of life in a large population of older adults
[4] Fowler et al 2022 Europe Qualitative, constructivist grounded theory, individual interviews 6; 75 (64–85) Explore social functioning and engagement in older adults with age-related hearing loss who used hearing aids or cochlear implants
[5] Goman et al 2021 North America Longitudinal, quasi-experimental (test at baseline session -retest at 6 months follow up session) 40; 77 (70–84) Evaluate a hearing loss intervention versus an aging education intervention on activity engagement in the aging and cognitive health evaluation in elders pilot (ACHIEVE-P)
[6] Gopinath, Hickson, et al 2012 Oceania Longitudinal, correlational, data from 2 waves (1997–99 & 2002–04) of the blue mountains hearing study 811; 49+ (T0) Assess both cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between measured hearing impairment and self-perceived hearing handicap, and health outcomes (comorbidities, functional and cognitive decline, self-rated health, and well-being)
[7] Gopinath, Schneider, Hickson, et al 2012 Oceania Longitudinal, prospective correlational, data from 2 waves (1997–99 & 2002–04) of the blue mountains hearing study 829; 67 Determine the prospective association between measured hearing impairment, self-reported hearing handicap and hearing aid use with quality of life
[8] Gopinath, Schneider, McMahon, et al 2012 Oceania Cross-sectional, correlational, data from the 10 years follow-up (2002–04) of the blue mountains hearing study 1572; 74 Assess the associations between hearing impairment with activity limitations as assessed by the activities of daily living (ADL) scale
[9] Hay-McCutcheon et al. 2018 North America Cross-sectional, correlational 80; 70 (60+) Explore the extent to which hearing loss affected positive social interactions in older adults living in rural and urban communities
[10] Heffernan et al., 2016 2016 Europe Qualitative, deductive thematic analysis, individual semi-structed interviews, 2 groups: Adults with mild-moderate hearing loss & hearing healthcare professionals 25 (+9 hearing healthcare professionals); 69 (20–91) Explore the psychosocial experiences of adults with hearing loss using the self-regulatory model as a theoretical framework
[11] Hickson et al 2008 Oceania Cross-sectional, Descriptive/correlational, participants were a subset of subjects from the University of Queensland’s active communication education program 178; 74 (53–94) Investigate: (i) The associations between measured hearing impairment and self-reported hearing and communication difficulties (i.e., activity limitations, participation restrictions), health-related quality of life and wellbeing in community-based older australians; and (ii) the influence of age, gender, living situation and hearing aid use on these associations
[12] Huang et al 2020 North America Cross-sectional, correlational, data from wave 2 (2010–11) of the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project 3196; 73 (62–91) (i) Investigate the associations between functional hearing and loneliness and (ii) assess effect modification by age, sex, and marital status
[13] Ishigami et al 2020 North America Cross-sectional, descriptive, baseline data (2010–15) from the Canadian longitudinal study on aging 51 338; 60 (45–85) Describe the profile of assistive device users in Canada regarding socio-demographic and health factors as well as socials, including social participation
[14] Jang et al 2003 North America Cross-sectional, descriptive/correlational, sample from the Charlotte County healthy aging study 425; 72 (60–84) Examine the comparative roles of vision and hearing in different aspects of older individuals’ lives
[15] Jayakody et al 2020 Oceania Qualitative, community conversation, groups of five participants to discuss three open-ended questions 40; (60+) Identify the views of the community members when designing an online community using Facebook to support the psychosocial well-being of hearing- impaired older adults
[16] Jones et al 2019 North America Cross-sectional, 10-week prospective single-blind pilot RCT of interactive group auditory rehabilitation (GAR; control) versus GAR + interactive socialisation/health education (SHE) & strengthening exercises 66; 74 (65+) Explore the impact of a group exercise and socialisation/health education intervention and group auditory rehabilitation on physical function and loneliness among older adults with hearing loss
[17] Kerr & Stephens 2000 Europe Mixed, (QUAL) open-ended questionnaire (to list positive experiences due to their hearing loss) while waiting for (QUAN) the doctor (where participants were asked to rate how helpful they found each positive experience they listed) or a hearing testing 207; 63 Understand the nature and function of positive experiences in living with auditory disablement
[18] Krawczyk 2001 North America Qualitative (thesis), phenomenology, individual semi-structured interviews 15; 80 (66–100) Explore acquired hearing loss in seniors as a risk factor for a decline in the psychosocial functioning within that population
[19] Lazzarotto et al 2016 Europe Cross-sectional, descriptive/correlational, dyads were recruited in a French preventive health center 88 (44 dyads); patients 71 (57–93), caregivers 64 (19–87) Determine whether quality of life of patients and caregivers is influenced by coping strategies implemented either by themselves or their relatives
[20] Lazzarotto et al 2018 Europe Cross-sectional, descriptive/correlational, performed in a French preventive health center 51; 71 (66–79) Assess the associations between psycho-behavioral determinants and quality of life in individuals with age-related hearing loss
[21] Lazzarotto et al 2019 Europe Cross-sectional, descriptive/correlational, dyads were recruited in a French preventive health center 896 (448 dyads); patients 70 (66–77), caregivers 69 (63–76) Examine, in a sample of patient-caregiver dyads in the specific context of age-related hearing loss, whether the quality of life of patients and caregivers is influenced by the coping processes they use from a specific actor–partner interdependence model (APIM)
[22] Liljas et al 2016 Europe Longitudinal, descriptive/correlational, sample of British men followed up for 2 years for disability and 10 years for mortality 3981; 72 (63–85 in 2003) Examine the associations between hearing impairment and risk of incident disability and all-cause mortality
[23] Mick et al 2014 North America Cross-sectional, descriptive/correlational, data from the 1999 to 2006 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHNES) 860 (60–69) + 593 (70–84); (60–84) Determine if age-related hearing loss is associated with social isolation and whether factors such as age, gender, income, race, or hearing aid use moderated this association
[24] Mikkola et al 2014 Europe Cross-sectional, descriptive/correlational, data from the Life Space Mobility in Old Age (LISPE) 848; 81 (75–90) Investigate whether hearing difficulty is associated with objective and perceived participation in social and leisure activities outside the home in older adults
[25] Mikkola et al 2015 Europe Longitudinal, descriptive/correlational, data from the life space mobility in old age (LISPE) 767; 81 (75–90) Investigate whether self-reported hearing problems are associated with time spent out-of-home and withdrawal from a leisure activity among older adults
[26] Morgan et al 2002 Oceania Cross-sectional, descriptive/correlational, participants were a subset of 250 subjects who had taken part in the University of Queensland’s longitudinal “keep on talking” program 93; 72 (59–96) Investigate the impact of hearing impairment on the quality of life of older australians
[27] Moser et al 2017 Europe Cross-sectional, descriptive/correlational 65; 72 (55–75+) Explore the influence of hearing problems, various coping strategies, and perceived social support on quality of life
[28] Palmer et al 2019 North America Cross-sectional, prospective correlational, participants recruited from the communication, health, aging, relationship types and support study 240; 73 (65–94) Examine whether the severity of a communication impairment was associated with a range of social measures and to examine the association between these characteristics and psychological well-being
[29] Polku et al 2016 Europe Cross-sectional, correlational, data from a second follow up of the Life Space Mobility in Old Age (LISPE) and a new sub-study (Hearing, cognition, and well-being) 706; 82 (76–91) Assess the associations between different domains of quality of life, perceived hearing difficulties in various everyday situations, and audiometrically measured hearing level among community dwelling older adults
[30] Pronk et al 2013 Europe Longitudinal, descriptive/correlational, data from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA; covering 4 years of follow-up) 996 (self-report analyses) and 830 (speech-in-noise test analyses); 74 (63–93) (i) Determine the longitudinal associations between baseline hearing status and 4-year follow-up depression and loneliness in an older population and (ii) investigate possible differences across subgroups (i.e., men, partner in the household, one or more chronic disease(s)) in these associations
[31] Pronk et al 2014 Europe Longitudinal, descriptive/correlational, data from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA; covering 3 to 7 years of follow-up) 1178; (57–85+) Investigate whether the rate of decline in older adults’ hearing status is associated with the rate of decrease in their psychosocial health and explore moderation by baseline hearing status, health-related factors, and sociodemographic factors
[32] Ramage-Morin 2016 North America Cross-sectional, descriptive/correlational, data from 2008/2009 Canadian Community Health Survey-Healthy Aging (CCHS-HA) 30 176; 60 Examine the prevalence of hearing difficulties and social isolation, and associations between them when controlling for sociodemographic factors, functional limitations, incontinence, and fear of falling
[33] Raymond & Lantagne Lopez 2020 North America Mixed, phase 1 (QUAL): Focus groups using 2 scenarios to be analyzed, phase 2 (QUAN): Questionnaire survey developed from the results of phase 1 40 for phase one (38 focus group +2 individual interviews) 86 for the questionnaire; focus groups: 39-: 18%, 40–59: 23%, 60–74: 48%, 75+: 13%/questionnaire: 39-: 10%, 40–59: 32%, 60–74: 40%, 75+: 18% Document the social representations that exist within seniors’ organizations regarding participation by older adults with impairments
[34] Schneider et al 2010 Oceania Longitudinal, correlational, data from the Blue Mountains Hearing Study (BMHS) 2 956, 1 457 at the 5-year follow-up; 69 Estimate the cross-sectional and longitudinal impact of hearing loss on use of community support services and reliance on non-spouse family/friends among older adults
[35] Shukla et al 2021 North America Cross-sectional, descriptive/correlational, data from the 2015 Medicare Current Beneficiaries Survey (MCBS) 1009; 64-: 16.14%, 65–74: 49.60%, 75+: 34.26% Investigate the independent association between functional hearing loss and social engagement in a nationally representative sample of older adults
[36] Simpson et al 2018 Oceania Cross-sectional, correlational 65; 65–70: 26%, 71–80: 34%, 81+: 40% Examine the associations between self-reported loneliness and internet use in hearing aid wearers aged 65 years and over
[37] Solheim et al 2011 Europe Cross-sectional, descriptive/correlational, participants recruited from a hospital waiting list for outpatient hearing aid fitting 84; 65–92 (less than 80: 51.2%, more than 80: 48.8%) Assess the daily life consequences of hearing loss in older adults and to explore the influences of hearing loss, subjective assessment of health and general life satisfaction, gender, age, and marital status
[38] Strawbridge et al 2000 North America Longitudinal, correlational, data from the Alameda County study (began in 1965, with follow-up in 1974, 1983, 1994 & 1995) 2461; 65 (50–102) Determine whether functional and psychosocial outcomes associated with hearing impairment are a direct result or stem from prevalent comorbidity
[39] Sung et al 2015 North America Cross-sectional, descriptive/correlational, participants from the Studying Multiple Outcomes After Aural Rehabilitative Treatment (SMART) 145; 50–94 (50–59: 14.6%, 60–69: 34.5%, 70–79: 29%, 80+: 21.9%) Determine factors associated with loneliness in older adults presenting for hearing loss treatment
[40] Weinstein et al 2016 North America Cross-sectional, quasi-experimental, test at the hearing aid fitting, retest at 1-week & 4- to 6- week follow-up 40; 80 (62–92) Investigate the buffering effects of hearing aid use on perceived social and emotional loneliness
[41] Zhang et al 2016 Oceania Cross-sectional, descriptive/correlational, baseline data from the Brief Risk Identification of Geriatric Health Tool (BRIGHT) 3817; 80 (61–98) Establish associations between sensory-related disability and quality of life