. 2023 Jul 12;33(12):9401–9410. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09897-2

Table 3.

Percentages of clinicians (with absolute numbers between parentheses) who indicated which proportion of diagnostic radiology examinations they interpret completely by themselves, without consultation of a radiologist or reading the radiology report

Proportion completely self-interpreted examinations	Radiography^a	Ultrasonography^a	CT^b	MRI^b
None	26.5% (n = 62)	62.7% (n = 158)	57.4% (n = 152)	67.2% (n = 170)
1–25%	23.5% (n = 55)	13.5% (n = 34)	15.1% (n = 40)	15.8% (n = 40)
26–50%	9.4% (n = 22)	5.2% (n = 13)	8.7% (n = 23)	7.5% (n = 19)
51–75%	9.8% (n = 23)	3.6% (n = 9)	8.7% (n = 23)	5.9% (n = 15)
76–99%	21.8% (n = 51)	4.0% (n = 10)	6.8% (n = 18)	2.4% (n = 6)
100%	9.0% (n = 21)	7.5% (n = 19)	3.4% (n = 9)	1.2% (n = 3)

Proportion completely self-interpreted examinations

Radiography^a

Ultrasonography^a

CT^b

MRI^b

None

26.5%

(n = 62)

62.7%

(n = 158)

57.4%

(n = 152)

67.2%

(n = 170)

1–25%

23.5%

(n = 55)

13.5%

(n = 34)

15.1%

(n = 40)

15.8%

(n = 40)

26–50%

9.4%

(n = 22)

5.2%

(n = 13)

8.7%

(n = 23)

7.5%

(n = 19)

51–75%

9.8%

(n = 23)

3.6%

(n = 9)

8.7%

(n = 23)

5.9%

(n = 15)

76–99%

21.8%

(n = 51)

4.0%

(n = 10)

6.8%

(n = 18)

2.4%

(n = 6)

100%

9.0%

(n = 21)

7.5%

(n = 19)

3.4%

(n = 9)

1.2%

(n = 3)

^aNot filled in by 1 respondent

^bNot filled in by 5 respondents