Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 23;26(11):e26180. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26180

Table 1.

Regression estimates of the relationship between period of same‐sex marriage, male PrEP prescription rates and male PrEP‐to‐need ratios

Male PrEP prescription rate per 100,000 males Male PrEP prescription rate per 100,000 gay or bisexual males Male PrEP‐to‐need ratio
Adjusted incidence rate ratio 95% confidence interval Adjusted incidence rate ratio 95% confidence interval Adjusted mean difference 95% confidence interval
Year of same‐sex marriage
2004–2011 2.27 1.71–3.02 1.85 1.45–2.35 1.26 0.15–2.36
2012–2013 1.40 1.12–1.76 1.21 1.01–1.45 3.83 2.84–4.81
2014–2015 Reference Reference Reference
Year 1.65 1.59–1.70 1.65 1.60–1.71 1.09 0.85–1.33
Medicaid expansion 1.56 1.32–1.83 1.50 1.28–1.76 0.43 −0.53 to 1.38
Democratic governor 0.91 0.80–1.04 0.90 0.79–1.03 −0.24 −1.25 to 0.78

Note: For male pre‐exposure prophylaxis prescription rates per 100,000, generalized estimating equations negative binomial regression models were used to account for repeated observations of states with a log link, and log population offset. For male pre‐exposure prophylaxis‐to‐need‐ratio, we used generalized estimating equations linear models to account for repeated observations of states.