Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 10;14:1295285. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1295285

Table 1.

HLA-DR immunoaffinity enrichment methods comparison.

Donor No. of DC (x 106) Format Bead Amt (mg) Ab Clone Ab Amt (µg) Target Conjugation Ratio No. of HC Peptides No. of LC Peptides No. of Total Peptides mAb/Total Peptides (%) Ab-Bead Chemistry Comments on Experience
1^ A 1 Pierce NHS 3 G46-6 150 NA ND ND ND ND NHS -insufficient sensitivity
2# A 1 FG 1.6 G46-6 50 NA 1 0 15,826 0.0063 NHS -difficult to acquire beads
-beads challenging to use
3 B 2 Dynabeads M-280 3 G46-6 50 20:1 ND ND ND ND Biotin-Streptavidin -insufficient sensitivity
4 B 2 Sera Mag 1 G46-6 50 20:1 3 8 25,725 0.042 Biotin-Streptavidin
5 A 2 Sera Mag 2 G46-6 75 20:1 8 3 12,416 0.089 Biotin-Streptavidin -easily adapted for automation on the KingFisher
-reagents are easier to acquire
-reagents arrive in intended condition
6 A 2 Sera Mag 4 G46-6 150 20:1 5 2 12,150 0.058 Biotin-Streptavidin
7 C 2 Sera Mag 2 G46-6 100 10:1 12 8 29,428 0.068 Biotin-Streptavidin -G46-6 and GNE generated L243 are comparable
8* C 2 Sera Mag 2 L243 (GNE) 100 10:1 13 6 28,803 0.066 Biotin-Streptavidin -automated, consistent biotin incorporation, optimized bead, antibody, & DC amount, consistent peptide & cluster identification
9 C 2 Sera Mag 2 L243 (GNE) 100 20:1 14 5 29,050 0.065 Biotin-Streptavidin

^ Manufacturer recommendations # Published method (13) * Current optimized conditions PSM, Peptide Spectral Matches. NA, Not Applicable; ND, Not Detected.

The immunoaffinity enrichment of HLA-DR bound peptides was compared using different beads and resin with varying chemistries and sizes. Format number 8 is the optimum automated condition with consistent biotin incorporation, optimized streptavidin bead, capture antibody, and DCs results in consistent biotherapeutic peptide and cluster identification.