Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 24.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2023 Oct 17;42(10):113260. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113260

Figure 5. Input threshold and reciprocal activation delay properties arise within a minimal model of input-coupled positive feedback.

Figure 5.

(A) Minimal model of input-coupled positive feedback. Xtot: total concentration of X (note Xtot=X+pX). pXinit: initial concentration of pX (note pXinit>0). pXdet: detection concentration of pX (note pXdetXtot). Parameters E* and C* govern input threshold and reciprocal activation delay, respectively. Derivations and model generalization are described in Method S1.

(B–D) System steady-state analysis (B) and relationship between input and time to reach detectable output levels (C). Black curves: algebraic solutions of (A). Points: simulated cell heterogeneity; 2000 cells were simulated, each with a randomly selected value of E and randomly selected multiplier for krev, and pXinit. Distributions of randomly selected values are shown in (D) (STAR Methods). Colors: local point density. For analogous experimental data, see Figure S2I and Figure 2C.

(E) The minimal model algebraically predicts experimentally observed effects of Parkin mutations on circuit’s input threshold and reciprocal activation delay behavior (from Figure 4C).

(F) The minimal model can filter out simulated transient depolarization events. Simulated depolarization (and E accumulation) for varying lengths of time, followed by repolarization (and E dissociation). Rates of E accumulation and dissociation are noted (STAR Methods). Short depolarization yields no pX (i.e., pX=0). Medium depolarization yields negligible pX (i.e., pX<pXdet). Only sustained depolarization yields detectable pX (i.e., pXpXdet). See also Figure S5.