Abstract
Introduction
Two large multicentre European hospital networks have estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19 since 2021.
Aim
We aimed to measure VE against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) patients ≥ 20 years, combining data from these networks during Alpha (March–June)- and Delta (June–December)-dominant periods, 2021.
Methods
Forty-six participating hospitals across 14 countries follow a similar generic protocol using the test-negative case–control design. We defined complete primary series vaccination (PSV) as two doses of a two-dose or one of a single-dose vaccine ≥ 14 days before onset.
Results
We included 1,087 cases (538 controls) and 1,669 cases (1,442 controls) in the Alpha- and Delta-dominant periods, respectively. During the Alpha period, VE against hospitalisation with SARS-CoV2 for complete Comirnaty PSV was 85% (95% CI: 69–92) overall and 75% (95% CI: 42–90) in those aged ≥ 80 years. During the Delta period, among SARI patients ≥ 20 years with symptom onset ≥ 150 days from last PSV dose, VE for complete Comirnaty PSV was 54% (95% CI: 18–74). Among those receiving Comirnaty PSV and mRNA booster (any product) ≥ 150 days after last PSV dose, VE was 91% (95% CI: 57–98). In time-since-vaccination analysis, complete all-product PSV VE was > 90% in those with their last dose < 90 days before onset; ≥ 70% in those 90–179 days before onset.
Conclusions
Our results from this EU multi-country hospital setting showed that VE for complete PSV alone was higher in the Alpha- than the Delta-dominant period, and addition of a first booster dose during the latter period increased VE to over 90%.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, Alpha, Delta, hospital, vaccine effectiveness, Europe
Key public health message.
What did you want to address in this study?
To understand how well the COVID-19 vaccine was performing in Europe against hospitalisation during SARS-CoV-2 Alpha and Delta variant periods, we present vaccine effectiveness results from a multi-country study of complete and booster dose COVID-19 vaccination among adults (aged 20 years and over).
What have we learnt from this study?
Between March and June 2021 (Alpha period), vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 was 43% for partial vaccination and 86% for complete vaccination. For June to December 2021 (Delta period), vaccine effectiveness for complete vaccination was lower (52%) but with addition of an mRNA booster dose, effectiveness reached 91%, and remained > 90% up to 119 days after the booster dose.
What are the implications of your findings for public health?
In Europe in 2021, COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness results for the Alpha period indicated an excellent benefit for preventing hospitalisation after complete vaccination. During Delta variant circulation, however, a booster dose was required to achieve this level of effectiveness, and this was maintained for up to 4 months post booster.
Introduction
COVID-19 has caused considerable morbidity and mortality in Europe since March 2020. International collaboration accelerated COVID-19 vaccine development and within the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA), by the end of December 2021, there were five COVID-19 vaccines authorised for use with conditional marketing [1,2]: two are spike protein-based mRNA vaccines: Comirnaty (BNT162b2; Pfizer-BioNTech) and Spikevax (mRNA-1273; Moderna); two are spike-protein-based adenoviral vector vaccines: Vaxzevria (ChAdOx1; AstraZeneca) and Jcovden (Ad26.COV 2.5; Johnson & Johnson); one is a subunit vaccine: Nuvaxovid (NVX-CoV2373; Novavax).
Earlier in 2021, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Alpha variant was dominant in Europe, superseded by the Delta variant during the summer months. High efficacy was observed in randomised controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines carried out before Alpha or Delta circulation [3-6]. However, evaluating the real-world COVID-19 vaccine performance is critical for understanding and evaluating vaccination programmes [7,8].
The I-MOVE (Influenza – Monitoring Vaccine Effectiveness in Europe) network expanded in 2020 to include monitoring of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) and became the I-MOVE-COVID-19 network. The I-MOVE-COVID-19 and Vaccine Effectiveness, Burden and Impact Studies (VEBIS) networks in Europe have carried out hospital-based COVID-19 VE studies since 2021. Both networks use common generic protocols [9,10] and the test-negative case–control design.
We estimated VE against hospitalisation with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2. In the absence of complete genetic sequencing information, we aimed to investigate VE during the Alpha and Delta periods between March and December 2021.
Methods
Setting and study period
There were 15 I-MOVE-COVID-19 and VEBIS hospital VE study sites from 14 European countries participating in the two networks during the study period from 2 March to 25 December 2021 (Figure 1), including 46 hospitals.
We defined the Alpha- and Delta-dominant periods as weeks where ≥ 80% of variants sequenced were Alpha or Delta, respectively, in each country using GISAID data [11]. We included data only from these weeks: 3 March to 11 June for Alpha, and 21 June to 25 December for Delta dominance.
Study design and case definitions
We used the test-negative case–control design [12], in which we defined cases as SARI patients testing SARS-CoV-2-positive by RT-PCR within 48 h of hospital admission or within the previous 14 days. Controls were SARI patients testing PCR-negative for SARS-CoV-2 within 48 h of admission. We used the ECDC definition for a possible COVID-19 case to define our study population of SARI patients (individuals hospitalised for at least 24 h, presenting with fever or cough or shortness of breath or sudden onset anosmia, ageusia, or dysgeusia) [13].
Study sites adapted their I-MOVE-COVID-19 or VEBIS VE network hospital study protocols [9,10] to their country-specific setting, as appropriate. Eleven sites included all SARI patients admitted to participating hospitals. The participating hospital in Belgium, the two in Lithuania and the over 20 hospitals in participating Spanish regions (except Navarra) included all SARI patients admitted on either 1 or 2 days each week. One site (the Netherlands) included a maximum of 10 SARI patients per week.
Study site teams collected demographic data (age, sex), clinical data (chronic conditions) and COVID-19 vaccination information via questionnaire, electronic medical records, vaccine registries or patient interview.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
We included patients aged 20 years and over who belonged to the age-specific target group for COVID-19 vaccination of their country at time of swab. We excluded patients with missing/erroneous key variables (age, sex, key dates, vaccination information). Study sites excluded patients with contraindications for vaccination.
Definitions of vaccination status
We defined SARI patients as partially vaccinated with primary series vaccination (PSV) 14 days after receiving one of two recommended doses of a two-dose vaccine; as completely vaccinated with PSV 14 days after receiving either the second of two recommended doses of a two-dose vaccine, or a single dose of JCovden; as having received a complete PSV plus booster dose 14 days after receiving the first mRNA booster; as unvaccinated if they did not receive any COVID-19 vaccine or were vaccinated with the first dose of a two-dose vaccine (or a single dose of JCovden) on or after the date of symptom onset. Those vaccinated with the second dose of a two-dose vaccine on or after their date of onset were recoded as partially vaccinated. Anyone vaccinated 1–14 days before onset was excluded. All analyses used unvaccinated as the comparison unexposed group (Table 1).
Table 1. Vaccination and analysis definitions for SARS-CoV-2 Alpha (3 March–11 June 2021) and Delta (21 June–25 December 2021) periods, I-MOVE-COVID-19 and VEBIS hospital vaccine effectiveness studies.
Period | Alpha | Alpha, Delta | Delta | Delta | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vaccination or group | Partial PSV | Complete PSV | Booster | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | Time since vaccination | Group E |
Definition | 14 days after receiving one of two recommended doses of a two-dose vaccine | 14 days after receiving either: - the second of two recommended doses of a two-dose vaccine or - a single dose of JCovden |
14 days after receiving the first mRNA booster | Complete PSV, with: - no booster, but eligible for a booster dose i.e. in the age-specified BDTG based on national recommendations - last PSV dose received ≥ 150 days before onset |
Complete PSV + first mRNA booster in BDTG, with: - ≥ 150 days between the last PSV dose and the booster dose |
Complete PSV only, for: - all in PSV target group regardless of time since last dose |
Complete PSV only, for: - all in BDTG regardless of time since last dose |
Complete PSV without and with booster for all vaccine products combined, for: - all in BDTG - by time since vaccination (30-, 60- and 90-day periods) |
Complete PSV, in BDTG, with - symptom onset < 150 days from last PSV dose |
Analysis | Analysis 1: Alpha period VE for partial and complete PSV | Analysis 2: Delta period VE for complete PSV ± booster, with last PSV dose ≥ 150 days before onset (complete PSV only), or ≥ 150 days before booster (complete PSV + booster) | Analysis 3: VE for complete PSV only for those in different vaccine target groups, regardless of time since last PSV dose | Analysis 4: VE for those in BDTG, complete PSV ± booster, over time | Analysis 5: VE for complete PSV only, with last PSV dose < 150 days before onset |
BDTG: booster dose target group; I-MOVE: Influenza – Monitoring Vaccine Effectiveness in Europe; PSV: primary series vaccination; SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; VE: vaccine effectiveness; VEBIS: Vaccine Effectiveness, Burden and Impact Studies.
For this analysis, we excluded those who had heterologous primary series doses or at least one unknown primary series product and we only included patients receiving the same product for both PSV doses (homologous PSV).
Statistical analysis
We compared the odds of vaccination between cases and controls using logistic regression, calculating VE as 1 minus the OR of vaccination among cases and controls (expressed as a percentage). We included study site (as a fixed effect) and date of swab (modelled as a spline or categorical variable, with the best functional form designated by the Akaike information criterion) in all VE analyses.
We further adjusted the OR for age, sex and presence of at least one of the four commonly collected and COVID-19-relevant chronic conditions (asthma, diabetes, heart disease and lung disease).
For the age-specific analyses, we stratified the data into three age groups: 20–59, 60–79 and ≥ 80 years. We also performed stratified analyses by sex and by presence of at least one chronic condition (vs no chronic conditions). In time-since-vaccination analyses for the Delta period, we measured VE by days since last PSV dose (for those with complete PSV) and by days since mRNA booster dose (for those with complete PSV plus first booster), for 30-, 60- and 90-day periods.
During the Alpha period, we estimated VE against hospitalisation with COVID-19 in SARI patients for partial and complete PSV (Table 1; Analysis 1).
During the Delta period, we estimated VE against hospitalisation in SARI patients with COVID-19, restricting most analyses to patients eligible for a booster dose (i.e. who were in the age-specified booster dose target group based on national recommendations; Table 1). We estimated VE in all those with complete PSV without booster dose who had received their last PSV dose at least 150 days before onset (Group A; Analysis 2), and in those with a first mRNA booster, who had ≥ 150 days between their last PSV dose and the booster dose (Group B; Analysis 2). The 150-day restriction in Group A was used to facilitate comparison with Group B (on average, participating countries recommended first booster dose to be 5 months after last PSV dose). This analysis was conducted for the Delta period because the long duration of circulation resulted in longer delays from last PSV dose to onset.
In Analysis 3, we estimated VE for those receiving PSV only, in different vaccination target groups: the PSV target group (Group C), and the country-specific booster dose target group (BDTG; Group D). Time since last PSV was not taken into account (Table 1).
In Analysis 4, we estimated VE for complete PSV without and with booster by time since vaccination (using 30-, 60- and 90-day periods) for all vaccine products combined.
In Analysis 5, we estimated VE for those with complete PSV in a country-specific BDTG with symptom onset less than 150 days from their last PSV dose (Table 1).
Sensitivity analyses
We conducted sensitivity analyses excluding all SARI patients with known prior infection, and another restriction included only SARI patients with severe outcomes (either admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) or death in hospital). Where the number of cases or controls per parameter was < 10, a sensitivity analysis was conducted using Firth’s method of penalised logistic regression (PLR) to assess small sample bias [14,15], which we considered to be present if there was a difference of 10 percentage points between the PLR and original VE estimate. Any estimates meeting this criterion for small sample bias were not included, also we do not present any VE estimates in any stratum for which the total number of vaccinated cases and controls was < 20.
Results
Entire Alpha and Delta period (March to December 2021)
Fifteen sites submitted data on 8,616 SARI patients swabbed between 2 March and 25 December 2021 (Figure 1, Figure 2). Data from four sites were not eligible for inclusion in analysis from the outset, as their data included fewer than five cases (one site) or controls (two sites), or their participating hospitals had been designated ‘COVID only’ earlier in the pandemic and SARI patients were almost exclusively SARS-CoV-2-positive (one site). After exclusions, a further four sites were excluded from the Alpha period and one more from the Delta period (Figure 1) for having fewer than five cases or controls.
Alpha period (3 March to 11 June 2021)
Descriptive analysis
Seven sites submitted data eligible for inclusion in this period (Table 2). After applying the study and analysis exclusion criteria (Figure 2), we included 1,087 cases and 538 controls who had been swabbed during the Alpha-dominant period. Most cases (n = 838; 77%) were younger than 80 years, while 320 controls (60%) were in this age group (Table 2). Fifty-seven per cent of cases (n = 622) and 54% of controls (n = 292) were male. Fifty-six per cent of cases (n = 606) and 74% of controls (n = 399) had one or more of the four commonly collected chronic conditions.
Table 2. Characteristic of cases and controls, I-MOVE-COVID-19 and VEBIS hospital vaccine effectiveness studies, Europe, SARS-CoV-2 Alpha and Delta periods March–December 2021 (n = 4,736).
Patient characteristic | Alpha period: January to June 2021 (n = 1,625) | Delta period: July to December 2021 (n = 3,111) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARS-CoV-2 cases (n = 1,087) | Test-negative controls (n = 538) | SARS-CoV-2 cases (n = 1,669) | Test-negative controls (n = 1,442) | |||||
Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | |
Median age (years) | 69 | 76 | 63 | 72 | ||||
Age groups (years) | ||||||||
20–59 | 247 | 22.7 | 69 | 12.8 | 695 | 41.6 | 348 | 24.1 |
60–79 | 591 | 54.4 | 251 | 46.7 | 644 | 38.6 | 641 | 44.5 |
≥ 80 | 249 | 22.9 | 218 | 40.5 | 330 | 19.8 | 453 | 31.4 |
Sex | ||||||||
Male | 622 | 57.2 | 292 | 54.3 | 984 | 59.0 | 815 | 56.5 |
Female | 465 | 42.8 | 246 | 45.7 | 685 | 41.0 | 627 | 43.5 |
At least one chronic conditiona | ||||||||
No | 481 | 44.3 | 139 | 25.8 | 929 | 55.7 | 449 | 31.1 |
Yes | 606 | 55.7 | 399 | 74.2 | 740 | 44.3 | 993 | 68.9 |
COVID-19 vaccination status | ||||||||
Unvaccinated | 1,013 | 93.2 | 354 | 65.8 | 1,026 | 61.5 | 234 | 16.2 |
Partial vaccination onlyb | 62 | 5.7 | 94 | 17.5 | 35 | 2.1 | 68 | 4.7 |
Complete PSVc | 12 | 1.1 | 90 | 16.7 | 598 | 35.8 | 1,043 | 72.3 |
Complete PSV + first boosterd | NA | 10 | 0.6 | 97 | 6.7 | |||
Vaccine product among vaccinated: first dose | ||||||||
Comirnaty | 45 | 61.6 | 145 | 80.6 | 392 | 61.0 | 886 | 73.4 |
Vaxzevria | 21 | 28.8 | 19 | 10.6 | 156 | 24.3 | 178 | 14.7 |
Spikevax | 7 | 9.6 | 15 | 8.3 | 22 | 3.4 | 90 | 7.5 |
JCovden | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.6 | 72 | 11.2 | 47 | 3.9 |
Other/unknowne | 1 | NC | 4 | NC | 1 | NC | 7 | NC |
Vaccine product among vaccinated: second dose | ||||||||
Comirnaty | 12 | 100 | 82 | 92.1 | 381 | 71.1 | 852 | 78.0 |
Vaxzevria | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 135 | 25.2 | 155 | 14.2 |
Spikevax | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7.9 | 20 | 3.7 | 81 | 7.4 |
Other/unknowne | 0 | NC | 0 | NC | 0 | NC | 5 | NC |
Vaccine product among vaccinated: first booster | ||||||||
Comirnaty | NA | 10 | 100 | 89 | 91.8 | |||
Spikevax | 0 | NC | 7 | 7.2 | ||||
Other/unknowne | 0 | NC | 1 | 1.0 | ||||
Severe outcomes | ||||||||
Hospitalisation | 1,087 | 100 | 538 | 100 | 1,669 | 100 | 1,442 | 100 |
ICU admission | 231 | 21.7 | 20 | 4.0 | 330 | 20.0 | 119 | 8.4 |
No ICU admission | 835 | 78.3 | 482 | 96.0 | 1,317 | 80.0 | 1,295 | 91.6 |
Missinge | 21 | NC | 36 | NC | 22 | NC | 28 | NC |
In-hospital death | 181 | 19.0 | 27 | 8.7 | 195 | 12.6 | 92 | 7.3 |
Discharged alive | 744 | 78.2 | 242 | 77.5 | 1,286 | 83.0 | 1,082 | 85.9 |
Still in hospital/transferred | 27 | 2.8 | 43 | 13.8 | 69 | 4.4 | 85 | 6.8 |
Missinge | 135 | NC | 226 | NC | 119 | NC | 183 | NC |
Study site and countryf | ||||||||
Belgium | 87 | 8.0 | 68 | 12.6 | 115 | 6.9 | 88 | 6.1 |
Czechia | NI | NI | ||||||
Spain | 236 | 21.7 | 110 | 20.5 | 379 | 22.7 | 400 | 27.7 |
France | 39 | 3.6 | 14 | 2.6 | 197 | 11.8 | 136 | 9.4 |
Germany | NI | NI | ||||||
Greece | NI | NI | ||||||
Croatia | 579 | 53.3 | 74 | 13.8 | 433 | 25.9 | 92 | 6.4 |
Ireland | NI | 75 | 4.5 | 53 | 3.7 | |||
Lithuania | 24 | 2.2 | 6 | 1.1 | 34 | 2.0 | 22 | 1.5 |
Luxembourg | NI | NI | ||||||
Malta | NI | 95 | 5.7 | 225 | 15.6 | |||
Navarra, Spain | 37 | 3.4 | 85 | 15.8 | 42 | 2.5 | 109 | 7.6 |
the Netherlands | 85 | 7.8 | 181 | 33.6 | 77 | 4.6 | 149 | 10.3 |
Portugal | NI | 222 | 13.3 | 168 | 11.7 | |||
Romania | NI | NI | ||||||
All sites | 1,087 | 100 | 538 | 100 | 1,669 | 100 | 1,442 | 100 |
ICU: intensive care unit; I-MOVE: Influenza – Monitoring Vaccine Effectiveness in Europe; NA: not applicable; NC: not calculated; NI: no data included; PSV: primary series vaccination; SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; VEBIS: Vaccine Effectiveness, Burden and Impact Studies.
a At least one of four commonly collected conditions (diabetes, heart disease, lung disease, asthma).
b Partially vaccinated: any SARI patient who received only one of two recommended doses of a two-dose vaccine.
c Completely vaccinated: any SARI patient who received either both of two recommended doses of a two-dose vaccine, or a single dose of Jcovden.
d Vaccinated with first booster: any SARI patient who received either both of two recommended doses of a two-dose vaccine, or a single dose of Jcovden, plus one booster dose.
e Missing totals not included in percentages.
f Eight sites submitting data during the Alpha and five during the Delta period did not have sufficient eligible SARI patients for inclusion in these analyses (this table gives final numbers by site, after exclusions).
There were 62 (6%) partially and 12 (1%) completely vaccinated cases, 94 (18%) partially and 90 (17%) completely vaccinated controls. Vaccination rollout continued as cases and controls were selected (Figure 3).
All 12 completely vaccinated cases had received Comirnaty. Among the 90 completely vaccinated controls, 82 (91%) had received two doses of Comirnaty, seven (8%) had received Spikevax and one (< 1%) had received a single dose of JCovden (Table 2).
A higher proportion of cases than controls were admitted to ICU or died in hospital (22% vs 4% and 19% vs 9%, respectively; Table 1). Most (> 90%) cases and controls were swabbed between weeks 10–18 (Figure 3).
Vaccine effectiveness estimates
Analysis 1: Vaccine effectiveness in patients ≥ 20 years for partial and complete primary series vaccination
Partial vaccination VE among those aged ≥ 20 years (all vaccine products combined) was 43% (95% confidence interval (CI): 13–62); 45% (95% CI: 8–67) for Comirnaty and 31% (95% CI: −46 to 67) for Vaxzevria. Sensitivity analyses excluding SARI patients with known prior infection are appended in Supplementary Table S1, where the VE was within 2 percentage points for partial VE. For SARI patients with severe outcomes during the Alpha period, numbers were too small to estimate VE.
Complete PSV (all products) VE during this period was 86% (95% CI: 71–93); 85% (95% CI: 69–92) for Comirnaty (Table 3). There was insufficient sample size to estimate complete PSV VE for any other vaccine product during this period. The point estimate of VE for sensitivity analyses (prior infection) were identical for complete PSV; these results are made available in Supplementary Table S1. Again, there was not sufficient sample size for the sensitivity analysis for severe outcomes.
Table 3. Effectiveness of COVID-19 partial and complete primary series vaccination against hospitalisation among adults (≥ 20 years) with complete primary vaccination, by dose, age group and vaccine product, I-MOVE-COVID-19 and VEBIS hospital vaccine effectiveness studies, Europe, Alpha and Delta periods March–December 2021 (n = 4,736).
PSV vaccine product | Vaccinated/unvaccinated cases; vaccinated /unvaccinated controls |
VEa (95% CI) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Analysis 1: VE of partial and complete PSV, Alpha period (March–June 2021; n = 1,625) | ||||
Partial PSV | Complete PSV | Partial PSV | Complete PSV | |
All products combined | 7 sitesb; n = 1,523c | 7 sitesb; n = 1,469d | ||
All ≥ 20 years | 62/1,013; 94/354 | 12/1,013; 90/354 | 43 (13 to 62) | 86 (71 to 93) |
Comirnaty PSV | 7 sitesb; n = 1,463 | 6 sitese; n = 1,434 | ||
All ≥ 20 years | 33/1,013; 63/354 | 12/991; 82/349 | 45 (8 to 67) | 85 (69 to 92) |
Vaxzevria PSV | 6 sitese; n = 1,358 | 0 sitesf; n = 0 | ||
All ≥ 20 | 21/975; 19/343 | NA | 31 (−46 to 67) | NA |
Analysis 2: VE in patients eligible for a booster dose. Group A: those who received complete PSV only, with last PSV dose administered ≥ 150 days before onset. Group B: those who received PSV plus an mRNA booster dose administered ≥ 150 days after last PSV dose. Delta period (June–December 2021; n = 3,111) | ||||
Complete PSV (Group A) |
Complete PSV + mRNA booster (Group B) | Complete PSV (Group A) |
Complete PSV + mRNA booster (Group B) | |
All products combined | 7 sitesg; n = 524h | 2 sitesi; n = 88j | ||
All ≥ 20 years | 103/102; 268/51 | 4/39; 21/24 | 52 (18 to 71) | 91 (57 to 98) |
Comirnaty PSV | 6 sitesk; n = 435 | 2 sitesl; n = 88 | ||
All ≥ 20 years | 80/75; 233/47 | 4/39; 21/24 | 54 (18 to 74) | 91 (57 to 98) |
Vaxzevria PSV | 2 sitesl; n = 107 | 0 sitesm | ||
All ≥ 20 years | 6/65; 2/34 | ND | NDn | NA |
JCovden PSV | 3 sitesl; n = 141 | 0 sitesm | ||
All ≥ 20 years | 5/92; 6/38 | ND | NDn | NA |
Spikevax PSV | 2 sitesm; n = 112 | 0 sitesm | ||
All ≥ 20 years | 4/65; 9/34 | ND | NDn | NA |
Analysis 3: VE in patients vaccinated ≥ 14 days before onset for those with PSV only, for those in the PSTG (Group C) and those in the BDTG (Group D); Delta period (June–December 2021; n = 3,111) | ||||
Complete PSV, in PSTG (Group C) |
Complete PSV, in BDTG (Group D) |
Complete PSV, in PSTG (Group C) |
Complete PSV, in BDTG (Group D) |
|
All products combined | 10 siteso; n = 2,901p | 7 sitesg; n = 735q | ||
All ≥ 20 years | 598/1,026; 1,043/234 | 168/102; 414/51 | 79 (74 to 83) | 69 (51 to 80) |
20–59 years | 124/558; 223/92 | 21/45; 57/14 | 86 (80 to 91) | 86 (62 to 95) |
60–79 years | 271/350; 479/92 | 87/41; 193/24 | 80 (72 to 85) | 71 (44 to 85) |
≥ 80 years | 203/118; 341/50 | 60/16; 164/13 | 38 (−4 to 62) | 40 (−64 to 78) |
No chronic conditionr | 209/701; 286/107 | 39/48; 78/13 | 86 (80 to 90) | 79 (47 to 91) |
Any chronic conditionr | 389/325; 757/127 | 129/54; 336/38 | 71 (61 to 78) | 65 (40 to 79) |
Comirnaty PSV | 10 siteso; n = 2,390 | 7 sitesg; n = 560 | ||
All ≥ 20 years | 371/1,026; 759/234 | 96/102; 311/51 | 82 (77 to 86) | 74 (57 to 84) |
20–59 years | 57/558; 140/92 | 9/45; 35/14 | 91 (86 to 94) | 92 (73 to 98) |
60–79 years | 140/350; 310/92 | 38/41; 127/24 | 82 (74 to 88) | 79 (54 to 90) |
≥ 80 years | 174/118; 309/50 | 49/16; 149/13 | 49 (11 to 71) | 56 (−31 to 85) |
No chronic conditionr | 37/661; 16/98 | 6/43; 2/7 | 55 (7 to 78) | NDn |
Any chronic conditionr | 263/325; 565/127 | 81/54; 256/38 | 74 (64 to 81) | 69 (46 to 82) |
Vaxzevria PSV | 10 siteso; n = 1,548 | 3 sitess; n = 203 | ||
All ≥ 20 years | 135/1,026; 153/234 | 36/92; 37/38 | 69 (57 to 78) | 50 (−4 to 75) |
20–59 years | 31/558; 29/92 | 4/44; 2/12 | 59 (18 to 79) | NDn |
60–79 years | 85/350; 118/92 | 26/36; 34/18 | 81 (69 to 88) | 63 (10 to 85) |
≥ 80 years | 19/118; 6/50 | 6/12; 1/8 | 11 (−183 to 72) | NDn |
No chronic conditionr | 50/701; 53/107 | 12/43; 9/7 | 79 (65 to 88) | 74 (−14 to 94) |
Any chronic conditionr | 85/325; 100/127 | 24/49; 28/31 | 63 (43 to 76) | 37 (−38 to 72) |
JCovden PSV | 8 sitest; n = 1,309 | 3 sitess; n = 162 | ||
All ≥ 20 years | 65/976; 47/221 | 16/92; 16/38 | 60 (37 to 75) | 60 (1 to 84) |
20–59 years | 30/525; 26/84 | 5/44; 7/12 | 79 (58 to 90) | NDn |
60–79 years | 30/335; 14/88 | 8/36; 6/18 | 21 (−76 to 65) | |
≥ 80 years | 5/116; 7/49 | 3/12; 3/8 | NDn | |
No chronic conditionr | 37/661; 16/98 | 6/43; 2/7 | 55 (7 to 78) | |
Any chronic conditionr | 28/315; 31/123 | 10/49; 14/31 | 60 (26 to 78) | 64 (−4 to 87) |
Spikevax PSV | 5 sitesu; n = 1,117 | 1 sitev; n = 53 | ||
All ≥ 20 years | 20/849; 61/187 | ND w | 89 (81 to 94) | NDw |
20–59 years | 3/439; 21/60 | 97 (90 to 99) | ||
60–79 years | 12/306; 28/80 | 82 (60 to 72) | ||
≥ 80 years | 5/104; 12/47 | NDn | ||
No chronic conditionr | 8/566; 19/75 | 94 (84 to 98) | ||
Any chronic conditionr | 12/283; 42/112 | 83 (64 to 92) | ||
Analysis 4: Time-since-vaccination analysis. VE in patients vaccinated ≥ 14 days before onset who are in a BDTG, with complete PSV and those with complete PSV plus mRNA booster. Delta period (June–December 2021; n = 3,111) | ||||
Complete PSV only | Complete PSV + mRNA booster | Complete PSV only | Complete PSV + mRNA booster | |
All products combined | 7 sitesg; n = 735q | 3 sitess; n = 168j | ||
All ≥ 20 years | 168/102; 414/51 | 4/92; 34/38 | 69 (52 to 80) | 94 (77 to 98) |
Time since last dose (days) | ||||
14–29 | 0/102; 6/51 | 1/92; 16/38 | NDn | NDn |
30–59 | 1/102; 7/51 | 3/92; 12/38 | NDn | NDn |
≥ 60 | 167/102; 401/51 | 0/92; 6/38 | 68 (50 to 80) | NDn |
14–59 | 1/102; 13/51 | 4/92; 28/38 | NDn | 92 (67 to 98) |
60–119 | 27/102; 55/51 | 0/92; 6/38 | 78 (55 to 90) | NDn |
≥ 120 | 140/102; 346/51 | 0/92; 0/38 | 66 (45 to 78) | NDn |
14–89 | 6/102; 35/51 | 4/92; 33/38 | 93 (76 to 98) | 93 (75 to 98) |
90–119 | 22/102; 33/51 | 0/92; 1/38 | 73 (37 to 88) | NDn |
14–119 | 28/102; 68/51 | 4/92; 34/38 | 81 (62 to 91) | 94 (76 to 98) |
120–149 | 37/102; 78/51 | 0/92; 0/38 | 73 (48 to 86) | NDn |
150–179 | 30/102; 102/51 | 0/92; 0/38 | 70 (43 to 85) | NDn |
≥ 180 | 73/102; 166/51 | 0/92; 0/38 | 25 (−44 to 61) | NDn |
Analysis 5: VE of complete PSV among patients without booster dose but in BDTG and vaccinated 14–149 days before onset; Delta period (June–December 2021; n = 3,111) | ||||
All products combined | Three sitess; n = 308x | |||
All ≥ 20 | 53/92; 125/38 | 76 (57 to 87) | ||
20–59 years | 9/44; 40/12 | 92 (75 to 98) | ||
60–79 years | 34/36; 73/18 | 70 (31 to 87) | ||
80 years | 10/12; 12/8 | NDy | ||
No chronic conditionr | 17/43; 21/7 | 77 (24 to 93) | ||
Any chronic conditionr | 36/49; 104/31 | 76 (54 to 88) |
BDTG: booster dose target group; CI: confidence interval; ICU: intensive care unit; I-MOVE: Influenza – Monitoring Vaccine Effectiveness in Europe; NA: not applicable; ND: not done; PSTG: primary series target group; PSV: primary series vaccination; VE: vaccine effectiveness; VEBIS: Vaccine Effectiveness, Burden and Impact Studies.
a Odds ratio adjusted by study site as a fixed effect, time (restricted cubic spline of swab date, or swab month as a categorical term, depending on model), age or 5-year age group (linear or categorical term depending on model), sex, and presence of at least one of four chronic conditions (asthma, diabetes, heart disease, lung disease).
b Seven study sites: Belgium, Croatia, France, Lithuania, Navarra, the Netherlands and Spain.
c n = 1,523 after dropping 102 records from patients with complete vaccination.
d n = 1,469 after dropping 156 records from patients with partial vaccination.
e Six study sites: Belgium, Croatia, France, Navarra, the Netherlands and Spain.
f None of the participating sites with patients receiving complete vaccination had used Vaxzevria during the Alpha-dominant period.
g Seven study sites: Belgium, France, Malta, Navarra, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain.
h n = 524 after dropping 2,195 records from patients who were not yet in the target group for booster dose vaccination, 211 from those vaccinated < 150 days before onset, 101 from those with a booster dose, 213 from patients with partial vaccination, and 59 from sites with fewer than five 5 cases/controls (or a total of cases and controls < 20).
i Two study sites: Belgium and Spain.
j n = 88 after dropping 2,195 records from patients who were not yet in the target group for booster dose vaccination, 634 from those with partial vaccination or complete vaccination without booster, 114 from sites with fewer than five cases/controls (or a total of cases and controls < 20) and 80 from one site with no vaccinated cases.
k Six study sites: France, Malta, Navarra, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain.
l Two study sites: France and Spain.
m None of the participating sites recruited patients who had received a booster dose after having a complete primary course of Vaxzevria, JCovden or Spikevax.
n Numbers are too small to provide robust VE estimates when there are ≤ 20 vaccinated cases and controls in total.
o Ten study sites: Belgium, Croatia, France, Ireland, Lithuania, Malta, Navarra, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain.
p n = 2,901 after dropping 107 from those with a booster dose and 103 from those with partial vaccination only.
q n = 735 after dropping 2,195 records from patients who were not yet in the target group for booster dose vaccination, 101 from those with a booster dose, 21 from patients with partial vaccination, and 59 from sites with fewer than five cases or controls (or a total of cases and controls < 20).
r In this analysis stratified by chronic condition, the adjustment for presence of at least one chronic condition was removed.
s Three study sites: Belgium, France and Spain.
t Eight study sites: Belgium, Croatia, France, Malta, Navarra, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain.
u Five study sites: Croatia, France, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain.
v One study site: Spain.
w Pooled analysis not possible with just one site.
x n = 308 after dropping 2,195 records from patients who were not yet in the target group for booster dose vaccination, 371 from those who were vaccinated ≥ 150 days before onset, 115 from sites with fewer than five cases/controls (or a total of cases and controls < 20), 101 from patients with a booster dose, and 21 from those with partial vaccination only.
y Evidence of small sample bias so VE estimate not shown.
Partial VE was < 60% in those aged 60–79 years and < 30% in those ≥ 80 years; there was only sufficient sample size to estimate complete PSV VE in the oldest age group (≥ 75%); for partial and complete PSV results among adults (≥20 years) in the PSV target group, overall and in those eligible for a booster dose, see Supplementary Table S2. During this period, few individuals aged 20–59 years had been targeted for vaccination, so we could not provide estimates for this age group.
Delta period (21 June–25 December 2021)
Descriptive analysis
Ten sites submitted data eligible for inclusion in this period (Table 2). After applying the study and analysis exclusion criteria (Figure 2), we included 1,669 cases and 1,442 controls. Most cases (n = 1,339; 80%) were aged < 80 years, while 989 controls (69%) were in this age group (Table 1). Fifty-nine per cent of cases (n = 984) and 57% of controls (n = 815) were male. Forty-four per cent of cases (n = 740) and 69% of controls (n = 993) had one or more of the four commonly collected chronic conditions.
There were 35 (2%) partially and 598 (36%) completely vaccinated cases, 68 (5%) partially and 1,043 (72%) completely vaccinated controls (Table 2). Ten cases (1%) and 97 controls (7%) had received a first booster. Vaccination rollout continued as cases and controls were selected (Figure 3).
Of the 598 completely vaccinated cases, 391 (65%) had received an mRNA vaccine product (371 Comirnaty and 20 Spikevax), 135 had received Vaxzevria (23%) and 72 (12%) had received JCovden. Among the 1,043 completely vaccinated controls, 838 (80%) had received an mRNA product (759 Comirnaty and 79 Spikevax), 153 (15%) had received Vaxzevria and 47 (5%) had received JCovden (Table 2).
A higher proportion of cases than controls were admitted to ICU or died in hospital (20% vs 8% and 13% vs 7%; Table 2). Most cases (n = 1,095; 66%) were swabbed in weeks 28–39, while most controls (n = 895; 62%) were swabbed in weeks 38–49 (Figure 3).
Vaccine effectiveness estimates
Analysis 2: Vaccine effectiveness in patients ≥ 20 years and eligible for a booster dose
The VE for complete PSV alone (all products combined) was 52% (95% CI: 18–71); 91% (95% CI: 57–98) in those with complete PSV and an mRNA booster dose. For Comirnaty, these estimates were 54% (95% CI: 18–74) and 91% (95% CI: 57–98), respectively. Insufficient sample size prevented estimation of VE for other vaccine products (Table 3). The VE in sensitivity analysis (severe outcomes) was 32 percentage points higher for complete PSV; small sample size precluded sensitivity analysis for those with booster dose. Excluding those with known prior infection gave VE within 4 percentage points of this main analysis for those with booster; complete sensitivity analysis data are accessible in Supplementary Table S1.
Analysis 3: Vaccine effectiveness for complete primary series vaccination only, for those in different vaccination target groups
For SARI patients in Group C (PSV target group), complete PSV VE was 79% (95% CI: 74–83) for all products combined and 82% (95% CI: 77–86) for Comirnaty. For Group D (patients in BDTG), complete PSV was 69% (95% CI: 51–80) for all products and 74% (95% CI: 57–84) for Comirnaty. Sample size was small and confidence intervals wide for other products, particularly for stratified estimates (Table 3).
Analysis 4: Vaccine effectiveness by time since vaccination for those in a booster dose target group
There was insufficient sample size to estimate VE for complete PSV only in those with onset < 60 days since vaccination, and in those who had received a first mRNA booster dose for any period ≥ 120 days since last booster dose.
For complete PSV without booster, among those who received their last PSV dose 60–119 and ≥ 120 days before onset, VE was 79% (95% CI: 57–90) and 66% (95% CI: 45–78), respectively. The VE in this group was highest in those receiving their last PSV dose 14–89 days before onset, at 93% (95%CI: 77–98). For those with onset between 90 and 179 days after their last PSV dose, VE remained at or above 70%, but dropped to 33% (95% CI: −27 to 64) in those with last PSV dose ≥ 180 days before onset. Among those with a first mRNA booster, VE was 92% (95% CI: 67–98) if the booster dose was received 14–59 days before onset and remained > 90% up to 119 days. The VE in sensitivity analysis (severe outcomes) was 11 percentage points higher for complete PSV among those vaccinated ≥ 14 days before onset; the full sensitivity analysis is accessible in Supplementary Table S1.
Analysis 5: Vaccine effectiveness for complete primary series vaccination for those aged ≥ 20 years in a booster dose target group (but without booster dose) with last primary series vaccination dose < 150 days before onset
Complete PSV VE was 76% (95% CI: 57–87). Age stratification showed the highest VE in the youngest age group (20–59 years), at 92% (95% CI: 75–98) (Table 3).
Discussion
In our study, during the Alpha period, Comirnaty VE against COVID-19 hospitalisation in adults aged ≥ 20 years was higher for complete PSV (86%) than for partial vaccination (43%). During Delta-dominant circulation, for SARI patients with their last PSV or mRNA booster dose at least 150 days before onset, VE for complete PSV was 52%, rising to 91% on addition of the mRNA booster dose. For those having mRNA booster dose administered within 120 days before onset of symptoms, VE was at least 90%. Sample size precluded any booster dose VE estimates after this time.
Looking at time since vaccination for those with complete PSV only, VE was 93% for those with last dose within 90 days of onset, at least 70% for those with last dose 90–179 days before onset, and 25% for those with their last dose ≥ 180 days before onset. This may indicate that the most important criterion for effectiveness is the time which has elapsed since receipt of last dose of any vaccine, regardless of number of doses (we observed a VE of 93% in those with complete PSV alone and in those with mRNA booster, when last dose was received 14–89 days before onset). However, in the longer period 14–119 days from last dose to onset, we observed higher VE in those with booster dose (94% vs 81%). More analyses with greater sample size need to be carried out to investigate this further. Importantly, we observed during the Delta period that VE in patients < 80 years remained over 60% in those without a booster dose 150 days from their last PSV dose, and was over 50% in the oldest age group, with the median time since vaccination being considerably shorter in the younger vs the older age groups (176 vs 195 days, respectively). In addition, albeit with overlapping confidence intervals, we observed a ca 40 percentage point greater VE in those with chronic conditions in a BDTG on receipt of a booster dose.
Our study had some important limitations. We sought to mitigate the heterogeneity inherent in a multi-country observational study by the common use of a generic protocol in all sites and the adjustment of VE estimates by site. In addition, the test-negative design should reduce heterogeneity between study sites; conducted in a hospital setting, this design should limit the presence of any healthcare-seeking bias.
The ECDC case definition for possible COVID-19 patients [13] was developed to respond to the broader symptom range of COVID-19 and includes a wider range of symptoms than those used in the World Health Organization SARI case definition [16]. Using this more sensitive SARI case definition could have resulted in the inclusion of more patients hospitalised with, rather than because of, COVID-19; i.e. potentially vaccinated patients with milder COVID-19, hospitalised for another cause. This concern was highlighted during circulation of the milder Omicron variant [17,18]; it would result in a higher proportion of included vaccinated cases, underestimating the VE. In sensitivity analyses using more specific severe outcomes (ICU admission or death), we found considerably higher VE in those with complete PSV during the Delta, but not during the Alpha period.
Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection can provide some immunity to unvaccinated SARI patients. In some participating countries in our study (e.g. France, Spain), known prior infection resulted in a delay of the next scheduled dose. In other countries, some individuals may also have delayed vaccination if they had a known infection. This could result in milder disease in unvaccinated cases being discovered when a SARI patient is hospitalised with (not because of) COVID-19, as described above. In sensitivity analyses estimating VE after excluding those with prior infection, we found almost identical VE estimates, whether for partial and complete PSV (Alpha) or those with and without booster (Delta), although this information was missing in almost one-third of patients (data not shown).
Earlier in 2021, the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant was dominant in Europe, superseded by the Delta variant during the summer months. In participating countries, vaccine rollout was initially limited to vulnerable populations [19] (e.g. older adults, those in long-term care or those with co-morbidities; for a list of target groups for primary course and first booster dose vaccination by participating countries, see Supplementary Tables S3 and S4) with more susceptibility to COVID-19. In particular, the Alpha-dominant circulating period coincided with the early phase of the vaccine roll-out in the EU/EEA. This was based on an age-staggered approach that prioritised older adults and those at risk of severe outcome, as well as healthcare workers. Therefore, recruitment of study participants in this period would have mainly been among those initial target groups, and we could not provide VE estimates in all age groups during the Alpha-dominant period. Similarly, estimates could only be calculated for partial PSV for one other product than Comirnaty (Vaxzevria), while complete PSV VE could only be provided for Comirnaty, as this was the main COVID-19 vaccine product distributed in the EU/EEA at this time [20].
Despite these limitations, our all-product, complete PSV VE against COVID-19 hospitalisation in those aged at least 20 years during the Alpha-dominant period (86%; 95%CI: 71–93) was similar to or slightly lower than some other published estimates. For example, studies in those aged ≥ 18 years showed VE of 87% (95% CI: 81–91) in the United States (US) [21] and 93% (95% CI: 89–96) in a systematic review [22]. Other studies in Canada, the United Kingdom (UK), Israel and Denmark have shown somewhat higher estimates during this period [23-26]. Comparisons across studies should bear in mind differences in study design, minimal hospitalisation time, age groups (≥ 16 or ≥ 18 years vs our ≥ 20 years), potentially different severity criteria, and pooling of results for different severe outcomes (e.g. combining hospitalisation and death).
Similar to our findings, other studies have reported Comirnaty VE estimates for partial PSV to be lower than for complete PSV, and VE in the oldest age group to be lower than in younger age groups [25,27,28] during the Alpha period.
Our PSV VE estimates during the Delta-dominant circulating period (from 52% to 79% overall) were slightly lower than those published elsewhere (by product, overall and by age group). For example, other studies have reported PSV VE estimates against COVID-19 hospitalisation of 67–99% (Norway; combined vaccine products; cohort study [29]), 74–84% (Hungary; Comirnaty, Spikevax and Vaxzevria; cohort study [30]), 75–80% (US; Comirnaty; cohort study [31]), ≥ 95% (Canada; Comirnaty, Spikevax and Vaxzevria; test-negative design [32]) and ≥ 96% (UK; Comirnaty; test-negative design [24,26]). This could be due to our more sensitive SARI case definition, described above, as well as variations in time since vaccination between studies.
It is well documented that the VE against COVID-19 hospitalisation, including groups at higher risk for severe disease, declines with increasing time since vaccination [29,33-35], particularly in older adults [34,35]. A systematic review indicated that, as in our study, other studies had only small (9–10 percentage points) changes in VE ≤ 180 days from last primary series dose, with VE remaining ≥ 70% up to this time [35]. The temporal evolution of VE varies by age, vaccine product, circulating virus variant and region. This highlights the importance of multi-country studies using a similar generic protocol in an attempt to standardise the methodological approach and provide robust pooled results.
Conclusions
Our results from an EU multi-country hospital setting add to the evidence already available from other settings. Our study indicates that the VE point estimate of complete PSV was higher during the period of Alpha- than during Delta-dominant circulation (overall and for those vaccinated 14–89 days since last PSV dose), and that addition of a first booster dose during Delta-dominant circulation increased VE to over 90%. Finally, during the Delta-dominant period, we observed declining effectiveness over time, likely due to waning immunity. Despite this, VE was 93% 14–89 days after the last booster or PSV dose and remained 70% or greater 90–179 days from last PSV dose (in those without booster).
Ethical statement
The planning, conduct and reporting of the studies was in line with the Declaration of Helsinki. Official ethical approval was not required if studies were classified as being part of routine care/surveillance: Spain, Ireland, Malta. For the Netherlands, the study was not subject to the Dutch Medical Research with Human Subjects Law (Wet Medisch-wetenschappelijk onderzoek met mensen, WMO) as it is non-interventional, uses routine clinical data only and data were collected retrospectively. In Belgium and Germany, VE is included in SARI surveillance. For Belgium, this protocol was approved by the central Ethical Committee (CHU St Pierre, Bruxelles) and the local ethical committees of each participating hospital in 2011 (AK/12-02-11/4111), updated in 2014 (B.U.N. 143201215671). The German SARI surveillance was approved by the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Ethical Board (Reference EA2/218/19). Other study sites obtained local ethical approval from a national review board (Croatia: approved 24 May 2021 and 26 January 2022, Ethics committee of the Croatian Institute of Public Health, Klasa:030-02/21-01/1, Ur.broj:381-15-21-7; Klasa:030-02/21-01/1, Ur.broj:381-15-22-14; France: eighth amendment approved 28 May 2021 by the French Data Protection Agency, and the French ethics research committee ‘Comité de Protection des Personnes’; Lithuania: the protocol approved by the Lithuanian Biomedical Research Ethics Committee No. V06-V01LTU issued 29 June, 2020; updated on 11 May 2021 No. 6B-21-85; Navarra: approved by the Navarra Ethical Committee for Clinical Research (PI2020/45); Portugal: approved 19 January 2021 by the Ethics Committee of Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, no registration number given; Romania: approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ministerul Apărării Naționale Institutul Național de Cercetare pentru Dezvoltare Medico-Militară „Cantacuzino” for the period 2022–2023, No. CE199/2022).
Acknowledgements
Study teams are very grateful to all patients, physicians, laboratory teams, and national or regional epidemiologists who have contributed to the study.
The Spanish team thanks all the participants in the SiVIRA Group for Surveillance and vaccine effectiveness in Spain, including everyone involved in data collection and notification at the sentinel hospitals, laboratories, and public health units of all participating Autonomous Regions.
Participating laboratories submitted their sequences to GISAID (www.gisaid.org) for easy sharing with the central laboratory in Madrid.
Supplementary Data
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Authors’ contributions: AMCR was involved in the original methodological design of the study (generic protocol). She contributed to the coordination of the I-MOVE-COVID-19 and VEBIS hospital networks and undertook the statistical analysis on which the research article is based. She led the manuscript writing, interpreted results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
JH contributed to the coordination of the VEBIS hospital network, contributed to analysis, helped interpret results, contributed to manuscript writing and approved the final version of the manuscript.
VSM and FP coordinated the I-MOVE virological analysis of the I-MOVE-COVID-19 and VEBIS hospital networks, helped interpret results, and read, contributed to and approved the final version of the manuscript.
MV initiated the original methodological design of the study and coordinated the I-MOVE-COVID-19 network. EK contributed to the coordination of the I-MOVE-COVID-19 network and MV and EK interpreted results, contributed to manuscript writing and approved the final version of the manuscript. NN and SB were involved in study design, interpretation of results, review of the manuscript and approval of the final version of the manuscript.
CM, GPe, FAN, AM, OL, SD, LSe, JB, CBu, IIL, LD, RV, PH, GP, NA, RDü, BS-P, DN, MJK, IK, LbLN, NB, TD, AD, IM-B, CP, RDu, MK, LSo, SM, MS, JR, MTO-B, ZLM, PCJLB-V, VG, ZL, CBa, EVN, M-LB, JC, ML, JOD, IJ, RDe, MA, GW, KT, and all those in the I-MOVE-COVID-19 and VEBIS hospital networks, were responsible for the coordination of the study at the national/regional level and contributed to developing the study site-specific protocols. They were in charge of the data collection and management and validating the clinical and laboratory data published in this research article. They interpreted the results, read, contributed to and approved the final version of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Harder T, Koch J, Vygen-Bonnet S, Külper-Schiek W, Pilic A, Reda S, et al. Efficacy and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection: interim results of a living systematic review, 1 January to 14 May 2021. Euro Surveill. 2021;26(28):2100563. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.28.2100563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.European Medicines Agency (EMA). COVID-19 medicines. Amsterdam: EMA. [Accessed: 28 Mar 2021]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/public-health-threats/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/treatments-vaccines/treatments-vaccines-covid-19-authorised-medicines
- 3. Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, Kotloff K, Frey S, Novak R, et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(5):403-16. 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603-15. 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sadoff J, Gray G, Vandebosch A, Cárdenas V, Shukarev G, Grinsztejn B, et al. Safety and efficacy of single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(23):2187-201. 10.1056/NEJMoa2101544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Voysey M, Clemens SAC, Madhi SA, Weckx LY, Folegatti PM, Aley PK, et al. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet. 2021;397(10269):99-111. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32661-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.World Health Organization WHO). Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness. Geneva: WHO; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-2019-nCoV-vaccine_effectiveness-measurement-2021.1
- 8. Tregoning JS, Flight KE, Higham SL, Wang Z, Pierce BF. Progress of the COVID-19 vaccine effort: viruses, vaccines and variants versus efficacy, effectiveness and escape. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(10):626-36. 10.1038/s41577-021-00592-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Epiconcept. European study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against hospitalised SARI patients laboratory-confirmed with SARS-CoV-2. Draft generic protocol. Paris: Epiconcept; 2021. Available from: https://www.imoveflu.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/08feb2021_draft_generic_VE_protocol_hospital-based_COVID-19_v07.pdf
- 10.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Core protocol for ECDC studies of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation with Severe Acute Respiratory Infection laboratory-confirmed with SARS-CoV-2, version 1.0. Stockholm: ECDC; 2021. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/core-protocol-ecdc-studies-covid-19-vaccine-effectiveness-against-hospitalisation
- 11. Shu Y, McCauley J. GISAID: Global initiative on sharing all influenza data - from vision to reality. Euro Surveill. 2017;22(13):30494. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.13.30494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jackson ML, Nelson JC. The test-negative design for estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness. Vaccine. 2013;31(17):2165-8. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Peralta-Santos A. Assessment of COVID-19 surveillance case definitions and data reporting in the European Union. Briefing requested by the ENVI committee. Brussels: European Parliament; July 2020. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/652725/IPOL_BRI(2020)652725_EN.pdf
- 14. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(12):1503-10. 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Covenay J. FIRTHLOGIT: Stata module to calculate bias reduction in logistic regression. Boston: Boston College Department of Economics; 2008. [Accessed: 3 Feb 2020]. Available from: https://econpapers.repec.org/software/bocbocode/s456948.htm
- 16.World Health Organization (WHO). WHO surveillance case definitions for ILI and SARI. Geneva: WHO; 2014. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme/surveillance-and-monitoring/case-definitions-for-ili-and-sari
- 17. Feikin DR, Abu-Raddad LJ, Andrews N, Davies MA, Higdon MM, Orenstein WA, et al. Assessing vaccine effectiveness against severe COVID-19 disease caused by omicron variant. Report from a meeting of the World Health Organization. Vaccine. 2022;40(26):3516-27. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Stowe J, Andrews N, Kirsebom F, Ramsay M, Bernal JL. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron and Delta hospitalisation, a test negative case-control study. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5736. 10.1038/s41467-022-33378-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Overview of the implementation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies and vaccine deployment plans in the EU/EEA. Stockholm: ECDC; 2021 [Accessed: 28 Mar 2021]. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/overview-implementation-covid-19-vaccination-strategies-and-vaccine-deployment
- 20.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). COVID-19 vaccine tracker. Stockholm: ECDC. [Accessed: 28 Mar 2021]. Available from: https://vaccinetracker.ecdc.europa.eu/public/extensions/COVID-19/vaccine-tracker.html#uptake-tab
- 21. Tenforde MW, Patel MM, Ginde AA, Douin DJ, Talbot HK, Casey JD, et al. Effectiveness of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 messenger rna vaccines for preventing coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalizations in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74(9):1515-24. 10.1093/cid/ciab687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Liu Q, Qin C, Liu M, Liu J. Effectiveness and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in real-world studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Dis Poverty. 2021;10(1):132. 10.1186/s40249-021-00915-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Chung H, He S, Nasreen S, Sundaram ME, Buchan SA, Wilson SE, et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe covid-19 outcomes in Ontario, Canada: test negative design study. BMJ. 2021;374:n1943. 10.1136/bmj.n1943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stowe J, Andrews N, Gower C, Gallagher E, Utsi L, Simmons R, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against hospital admission with the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant. Public library. London: UK Health Security Agency. [Accessed: 1 Jan 2023]. Preprint. Available from: https://khub.net/web/phe-national/public-library/-/document_library/v2WsRK3ZlEig/view_file/479607329?_com_liferay_document_library_web_portlet_DLPortlet_INSTANCE_v2WsRK3ZlEig_redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fkhub.net%3A443%2Fweb%2Fphe-national%2Fpublic-library%2F-%2Fdocument_library%2Fv2WsRK3ZlEig%2Fview%2F479607266
- 25. Glatman-Freedman A, Bromberg M, Dichtiar R, Hershkovitz Y, Keinan-Boker L. The BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness against new COVID-19 cases and complications of breakthrough cases: A nation-wide retrospective longitudinal multiple cohort analysis using individualised data. EBioMedicine. 2021;72:103574. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Gram MA, Emborg HD, Schelde AB, Friis NU, Nielsen KF, Moustsen-Helms IR, et al. Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 hospitalization with the Alpha, Delta, or Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant: A nationwide Danish cohort study. PLoS Med. 2022;19(9):e1003992. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Skowronski DM, Setayeshgar S, Zou M, Prystajecky N, Tyson JR, Galanis E, et al. Single-dose mRNA vaccine effectiveness against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), including Alpha and Gamma variants: a test-negative design in adults 70 years and older in British Columbia, Canada. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74:(7):1158-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Skowronski DM, Setayeshgar S, Zou M, Prystajecky N, Tyson JR, Sbihi H, et al. Comparative single-dose mRNA and ChAdOx1 vaccine effectiveness against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, including variants of concern: test-negative design, British Columbia, Canada. J Infect Dis. 2022;226(1):485-96. 10.1093/infdis/jiac023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Starrfelt J, Danielsen AS, Buanes EA, Juvet LK, Lyngstad TM, Rø GØI, et al. Age and product dependent vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation among adults in Norway: a national cohort study, July-November 2021. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):278. 10.1186/s12916-022-02480-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Vokó Z, Kiss Z, Surján G, Surján O, Barcza Z, Wittmann I, et al. Effectiveness and waning of protection with different SARS-CoV-2 primary and booster vaccines during the Delta pandemic wave in 2021 in Hungary (HUN-VE 3 study). Front Immunol. 2022;13:919408. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.919408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Puranik A, Lenehan PJ, Silvert E, Niesen MJM, Corchado-Garcia J, O’Horo JC, et al. Comparison of two highly-effective mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 during periods of Alpha and Delta variant prevalence. medRxiv; 2021.08.06.21261707. 10.1101/2021.08.06 [DOI]
- 32. Skowronski DM, Febriani Y, Ouakki M, Setayeshgar S, El Adam S, Zou M, et al. Two-dose severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine effectiveness with mixed schedules and extended dosing intervals: test-negative design studies from British Columbia and Quebec, Canada. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75(11):1980-92. 10.1093/cid/ciac290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Goldberg Y, Mandel M, Bar-On YM, Bodenheimer O, Freedman L, Haas EJ, et al. Waning immunity after the BNT162b2 vaccine in Israel. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(24):e85. 10.1056/NEJMoa2114228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Andrews N, Tessier E, Stowe J, Gower C, Kirsebom F, Simmons R, et al. Duration of protection against mild and severe disease by Covid-19 vaccines. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(4):340-50. 10.1056/NEJMoa2115481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Feikin DR, Higdon MM, Abu-Raddad LJ, Andrews N, Araos R, Goldberg Y, et al. Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression. Lancet. 2022;399(10328):924-44. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00152-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.