Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 21;64(14):32. doi: 10.1167/iovs.64.14.32

Table 4.

Comparison Between DM vs Non-DM Eyes

DM Group (n = 30) Non-DM Group (n = 35) P Value
CC FD% (T1) 54.61 [51.18–59.79] 51.51 [41.14–58.07] 0.037
CC FD% (T2) 54.04 [49.71–60.12] 47.09 [40.15–54.41] 0.002
CC FDa (T1) 108.28 [78.75–176.76] 78.05 [41.59–119.81] 0.005
CC FDa (T2) 92.64 [67.58–150.52] 67.92 [35.41–87.27] 0.001
CC FDn (T1) 261.0 [172.9–492] 536.0 [319.8–890.8] 0.068
CC FDn (T2) 288.8 [199.0–419.7] 738.0 [382.0–1000] 0.056

Data are presented as median [IQR].

FDa, FD average area; FDn, flow deficits number; T1, before loading anti-VEGF therapy; T2, after loading anti-VEGF therapy.

The Friedman nonparametric test was performed to obtain P values.