Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 17;13(11):1596. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13111596

Table 2.

Modified Downs and Black quality index results and total score.

Quality items Ebrahimabadi et al., 2022 [29] Yousefi et al., 2020 [41] Fraser et al., 2019 [21] Ebrahimabadi et al., 2018 [26] Ebrahimabadi et al., 2017 [22] Hass et al., 2010 [30]
Reporting Q1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Q2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Q3 1 1 1 1 1 1
Q4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q5 2 2 2 2 2 2
Q6 0 1 1 1 0 1
Q7 1 1 1 1 1 1
Q8 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q9 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q10 1 1 1 1 1 1
External Validity Q11 1 0 0 0 1 0
Q12 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q13 1 0 1 0 1 0
Internal
Validity–Bias
Q14 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q15 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q16 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q17 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q18 1 1 1 1 1 1
Q19 0 0 1 0 0 0
Q20 0 0 1 0 0 0
Internal
Validity–Confounding
Q21 1 0 1 0 0 1
Q22 0 0 0 0 1 0
Q23 0 0 0 0 1 0
Q24 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q25 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q26 0 0 0 0 0 0
Power Q27 0 0 0 1 1 0
Total 11 9 13 10 13 10

Quality items = Q1: Hypothesis/Aim. Q2: Main Outcomes in Method/Introduction. Q3: Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria. Q4: Description of Interventions. Q5: Description of principal confounders. Q6: Main Findings. Q7: Random Variability. Q8: adverse events. Q9: Lost to Follow-Up. Q10: Actual Probability Values. Q11: Representative of the Entire Population (subjects asked to participate in the study). Q12: Representative of the Entire Population (subjects who were prepared to participate) Q13: Representative of the treatment (staff, places, and facilities). Q14: Blind Study Subjects. Q15: blind those measuring. Q16: data dredging Q17: analyses adjust for different lengths of follow-up of patients. Q18: Statistical Tests Appropriated Q19: reliable compliance with the intervention. Q20: Outcome Measures Used Accurate Q21: patients in different intervention groups or from the same population? Q22: same period of time Q23: Random Allocation Q24: assignment concealed Q25: adequate adjustment for confounding Q26: Losses of Patients to Follow-up. Q27: Estimate of Statistical Power.