Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 22;43(47):7982–7999. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0353-23.2023

Table 2.

Statistical values from the analysis shown in Figure 3F

Combination df t p
Control: female vs male 6 0.74 1.00
1 nm: female vs male 6 0.33 1.00
10 nm: female vs male 6 −2.99 0.12
100 nm: female vs male 6 −4.32 0.025
1 μm: female vs male 6 −3.11 0.10
Female: control vs 1 nm 2364 5.95 <0.0001
Female: 1 nm vs 10 nm 2364 30.9 <0.0001
Female: 10 nm vs 100 nm 2364 27.5 <0.0001
Female: 100 nm vs 1 μm 2364 3.27 0.0096
Male: control vs 1 nm 2364 3.72 0.0019
Male: 1 nm vs 10 nm 2364 30.9 <0.0001
Male: 10 nm vs 100 nm 2364 20.7 <0.0001
Male: 100 nm vs 1 μm 2364 3.34 0.0077

Calculated statistical values based on the linear mixed-effects (LME) model are shown in the table listed by combination of comparison (1st column), degree of freedom (df, 2nd column), t value (t, 3rd column), and p value (p, 4th column). Multiple comparisons were adjusted by Bonferroni's method for female versus male comparisons within each concentration and by Tukey's method for concentration comparisons in each sex. Concentrations are of PGE2.