Table 4.
Level 1 | MODEL 1 | MODEL 2 |
BASE OUTCOME Mild CAL | OR (IC 95%) | OR (IC 95%) |
Compared with Moderate + Advanced CAL | ||
CITIES Bogotá | 1 | 1 |
Other | 1.34 ** (1.09–1.64) | 1.58 † (1.25–2.01) |
AGE < 45 years | 1 | 1 |
>55 years | 1.46 ** (1.21–1.77) | 1.45 † (1.20–1.75) |
MICROORGANISMS | ||
P. gingivalis Negative | 1 | 1 |
Positive | 1.93 ** (1.35–2.76) | 2.44 † (1.77–3.38) |
T. forsythia Negative | 1 | |
Positive | 1.88 ** (1.30–2.70) | |
ANTIBODIES | ||
Low levels | 1 | |
IgG1 P. gingivalis | 0.85 (0.67–1.06) | |
Middle-High | ||
Low levels | 1 | |
IgG2. A. actinomycetemcomitans | 1.50 † (1.23–1.81) | 1.48 † (1.22–1.78) |
Middle-High | ||
PLAQUE INDEX Low | 1 | 1 |
Middle-High | 2.69 † (2.20–3.29) | 2.76 † (2.27–3.36) |
OBESITY Negative | 1 | |
Positive | 2.99 ** (1.40–6.36) | |
SMOKING Negative | 1 | 1 |
Positive | 1.94 ** (1.31–2.87) | 1.88 ** (1.28–2.76) |
Level 2 | ||
BASE OUTCOME | Mild + Moderate CAL | |
Comparison with advanced CAL | ||
REGION | 1 | 1 |
Bogota | 1.34 ** (1.09–1.64) | 1.54 † (1.21–1.96) |
Other regions | ||
AGE < 45 years | 1 | 1 |
>55 years | 1.46 † (1.21–1.77) | 1.46 † (1.21–1.76) |
MICROORGANISMS | ||
P. gingivalis Negative | 1 | 1 |
Positive | 1.93 † (1.35–2.76) | 1.89 † (1.33–2.69) |
T. forsythia Negative | 1 | |
Positive | 1.88 ** (1.30–2.70) | 2.33 † (1.56–3.49 |
ANTIBODIES Low level | 1 | |
IgG1 P. gingivalis | 1.42 ** (1.12–1.80) | |
Middle-High | ||
Low levels | 1 | 1 |
IgG2 A. actinomycetemcomitans Middle-High Level |
1.50 † (1.23–1.81) | 1.50 † (1.24–1.81) |
PLAQUE INDEX Low level | 1 | 1 |
Middle-High level | 2.69 † (2.20–3.29) | 2.67 † (2.19–3.26) |
OBESITY Negative | 1 | |
Positive | 0.94 (0.50–1.74) | |
SMOKING Never | 1 | 1 |
Current | 1.94 ** (1.31–2.87) | 1.86 ** (1.26–2.74) |
Middle CAL (clinical attachment loss) < 2 mm, MP= moderate CAL > 2 < 3.5 mm, advanced CAL ≥ 3.5 mm. ** p < 0.05. † p < 0.000. Level 1: comparison of mild vs. moderate and advanced CAL. Level 2: comparison mild and moderate vs. advanced CAL. Difference in BIC: model 1 = 1276.918, model 2 = 1287.819 = −10.901; this provides positive support for model 1.