Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 15;12(22):7119. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227119

Table 2.

Comparison between groups stratified by Mini-Cog score.

Parameters Mini-Cog Score, ≤2 Mini-Cog Score, ≥3 p-Value
N or Mean ± SD % or 95% CI Range N or Mean ± SD % or 95% CI Range
Subjects 60 8 686 92
Age, years 69.9 ± 11.6 69.3, 70.5 80.5 ± 7.5 79.1, 81.9 <0.0001
Sex
Male 29 48 372 54 0.42
Female 31 52 314 46
Word recall
0 30 50 0 0 <0.0001
1 6 10 53 8
2 24 40 163 24
3 0 0 470 69
Clock drawing
0 40 67 20 3 <0.0001
2 20 33 666 97
Eyes 114 8 1350 92
BCVA, LogMAR 0.37 ± 0.67 0.25, 0.49 0.20 ± 0.43 0.18, 0.22 0.0001
SERE, D −0.68 ± 1.5 −1.0, −0.39 −2.2 ± 3.3 −2.4, −2.1 <0.0001
MD, dB −9.5 ± 6.0 −11.0, −7.9 −7.9 ± 6.0 −8.2, −7.5 0.038
PSD, dB 7.6 ± 3.9 6.9, 8.3 8.2 ± 4.6 8.0, 8.5 0.15
FL, % 10.4 ± 11.5 8.3, 12.6 9.8 ± 12.1 9.1, 10.4 0.59
FN, % 10.3 ± 11.5 7.8, 12.8 5.5 ± 7.9 5.1, 5.9 <0.0001
FP, % 3.1 ± 5.1 2.2, 4.1 2.3 ± 3.3 2.1, 2.4 0.011

p-values are calculated by unpaired t-test for continuous data and by Fisher’s exact probability test or Cochran–Armitage trend test for categorical data. SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; LogMAR, logarithm of minimal angle of resolution; SERE, spherical equivalent refractive error; D, diopter; MD, mean deviation; PSD, pattern standard deviation; dB, decibel; FL, fixation loss; FN, false negative; FP, false positive.