Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 13;12(22):7058. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227058

Table 6.

Impact of CVD risk factors not included in the ASCVD Risk Calculator on the development of CVD.

Model Variables ASCVD Risk Calculator
OR −95%CI +95%CI Wald’s Statistics p-Value
Model 1 Intercept 0.164 0.079 0.342 23.202 <0.001
General obesity 0.000 0.000 0.000 1213.184 <0.001
Abdominal obesity 1.128 0.502 2.535 0.086 0.770
Model 2 Intercept 0.001 0.000 0.041 11.431 0.001
WC [cm] 1.000 0.964 1.038 0.000 0.987
HbA1c [%] 2.748 1.626 4.643 14.258 <0.001
TG [mg/dL] 1.001 0.992 1.011 0.085 0.771
Model 3 Intercept 0.077 0.017 0.343 11.309 0.001
Mets
(no MetS vs. pre-Mets)
1.484 0.316 6.972 0.250 0.617
Mets (no MetS vs. Mets) 19.138 3.522 103.979 11.684 0.001
BDI (score) 1.012 0.956 1.072 0.171 0.679
Model 4 Intercept 0.066 0.014 0.312 11.763 0.001
General obesity 0.000 0.000 0.000 822.633 <0.001
Abdominal obesity 0.562 0.205 1.540 1.254 0.263
Mets
(no MetS vs. pre-Mets)
1.794 0.342 9.418 0.478 0.489
Mets (no MetS vs. Mets) 25.623 3.885 169.002 11.357 0.001
BDI (score) 1.022 0.964 1.082 0.520 0.471

OR—odds ratio, CI—confidence interval, WC—waist circumference, HbA1c—glycated hemoglobin, TG—triglycerides, MetS—metabolic syndrome, BDI—Beck Depression Inventory. Model 0—could not be created because there was no increased risk of CVD among perimenopausal women. Model 1—model adjusted for the variables: general and abdominal obesity. Model 2—model adjusted for the variables: WC, HBA1C, TG. Model 3—model adjusted for the variables: diabetes, MetS, BDI score. Model 4—model adjusted for the variables: general and abdominal obesity, MetS, BDI score.