Table 2.
Prevalence of Positive |
Average Sample Size |
False/True Positive Rate |
Early Stopping Rate |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Scenario 1: No prognostic and predictive value of biomarker |
0.2 | 1754 | 0.066 | 0.035 |
0.4 | 1738 | 0.082 | 0.048 | |
0.5 | 1728 | 0.088 | 0.055 | |
0.6 | 1734 | 0.096 | 0.051 | |
0.8 | 1730 | 0.087 | 0.054 | |
Scenario 2: Only prognostic value of biomarker |
0.2 | 1692 | 0.212 | 0.083 |
0.4 | 1687 | 0.206 | 0.087 | |
0.5 | 1686 | 0.204 | 0.088 | |
0.6 | 1676 | 0.206 | 0.095 | |
0.8 | 1690 | 0.183 | 0.085 | |
Scenario 3: Only predictive value of biomarker |
0.2 | 1579 | 0.437 | 0.172 |
0.4 | 1384 | 0.693 | 0.328 | |
0.5 | 1176 | 0.862 | 0.485 | |
0.6 | 1072 | 0.989 | 0.561 | |
0.8 | 734 | 0.999 | 0.824 | |
Scenario 4: Prognostic value of both and quantitative interaction with and |
0.2 | 1237 | 0.888 | 0.433 |
0.4 | 932 | 0.994 | 0.668 | |
0.5 | 774 | 0.998 | 0.789 | |
0.6 | 669 | 0.999 | 0.870 | |
0.8 | 551 | 1.000 | 0.961 | |
Scenario 5: Qualitative and quantitative interaction in both biomarker |
0.2 | 1799 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
0.4 | 1800 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
0.5 | 1800 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
0.6 | 1800 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
0.8 | 1799 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |
Scenario 6: Qualitative and quantitative interaction in both biomarker II |
0.2 | 1786 | 0.015 | 0.011 |
0.4 | 1771 | 0.047 | 0.022 | |
0.5 | 1738 | 0.088 | 0.048 | |
0.6 | 1701 | 0.147 | 0.076 | |
0.8 | 1622 | 0.334 | 0.137 |