Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 24;13(11):1106. doi: 10.3390/metabo13111106

Table 3.

Comparison of SCFAs extraction methods from fresh fecal samples.

SCFAs AE Method Amount
(µmol/g) 1
AE Method
% RSD
TBME Method Amount (µmol/g) 1 TBME Method
% RSD
p-Value AE
vs. TBME 2,3
Acetic 69.42 8.63 36.80 20.94 <0.0001
Propionic 20.95 8.82 12.57 19.81 <0.0001
IsoButyric 5.89 6.82 3.53 19.45 <0.0001
Butyric 22.25 2.49 13.81 19.09 <0.0001
IsoValeric 8.48 6.05 5.24 20.21 <0.0001
Valeric 5.44 2.18 3.21 19.62 <0.0001
4-methyl valeric ND N/A ND N/A N/A
Hexanoic 0.57 2.15 0.25 17.98 <0.0001
Heptanoic ND N/A ND N/A N/A

n = 3; n—number of samples prepared by each extraction method. 1 Values are unadjusted means. 2 Student’s t-test. 3 Statistical significance at p < 0.05. SCFAs—short-chain fatty acids; AE—aqueous extraction; TBME—tert-butyl methyl ether extraction; RSD—relative standard deviation; ND—not detected; N/A—not applicable.