Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 24.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Rev X. 2022 Aug 17;12(3):031027. doi: 10.1103/physrevx.12.031027

FIG. 1. Substrate stiffness and aggregate size determine wetting dynamics.

FIG. 1.

(A) Diagram of an aggregate spreading on a fibronectin-coated polyacrylamide gel. (B) z-profile of F-actin stained aggregate adhered to glass. (C) DIC image of an aggregate spreading on glass. A0 is the projected area of an un-deformed aggregate, and A is the instantaneous contact area over which the monolayer has spread. (D) Normalized spread area A/A0 as a function of time and stiffness. (E) Difference in fitting R2 values as a function of stiffness. (F) Spreading rate 1A0dAdt measured between A=A0 and A=2A0(n=13 for 0.7 kPa and n=10 for 40 kPa). (G) Spreading rate as a function of aggregate size for 0.7 kPa substrate (red, n=27), 40 kPa substrate (blue, n=18), and glass (black, n=8). Scale bars are 50μm. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. ns is non-significant. Error bars are mean ± standard deviation.