Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 24.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 11;196:161–172. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.034

Fig. 2. Correlation synchrony based on fMRI and dynamic PET data.

Fig. 2.

(A) Tertiary group-mean matrices of the bolus injection cohort versus the constant infusion cohort indicate common functional and dynamic [18F]FDG-PET correlations; red shows common positive edges (r > 0.25) and blue shows common negative edges (r < −0.25). (B) Dice coefficients indicate similarities for total, positive and negative edges between weighted group-mean functional and dynamic [18F] FDG-PET correlations in both cohorts. The respective brain ROIs and their abbreviations are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Bolus injection cohort (N = 15); constant infusion cohort (N = 11). The error bars represent standard deviations. ** represents p-values < 0.01.