Table 3.

List of clusters that showed increased and decreased functional connectivity with the amygdala during fear processing

Cluster#	Volume (mm3)	Extrema	x	y	z	Label	Contributed studies
Increased connectivity
1	2520	0.013302	−40	10	−8	L. Insula, BA 13	13, 23, 44
		0.01063	−40	16	−8	L. Insula, BA 13
		0.008269	−52	16	6	L. Precentral Gyrus, BA 44
		0.007905	−42	16	0	L. Insula, BA 13
2	1104	0.012847	52	36	−2	R. Inferior Frontal Gyrus	13, 23
		0.008165	46	44	−8	R. Sub-Gyral, BA 10
3	944	0.011367	48	22	−14	R. Inferior Frontal Gyrus, BA 47	13, 23
		0.00815	52	30	−14	R. Inferior Frontal Gyrus, BA 47
4	736	0.00991	40	6	−4	R. Claustrum	3, 44
5	648	0.008639	2	44	4	L. Anterior Cingulate, BA 32	13, 23
		0.007927	6	36	2	R. Anterior Cingulate, BA 24
6	632	0.009047	16	48	−4	R. Anterior Cingulate, BA 32	13, 42
		0.008658	24	52	−4	R. Medial Frontal Gyrus, BA 10
Decreased connectivity			−60	−12	0	L. Superior Temporal Gyrus, BA 22
7	2952	0.008864	4	−12	4	R. Thalamus	20, 46
		0.008337	10	−10	4	R. Thalamus
		0.007903	4	−14	−2	L. Thalamus
		0.007745	−8	−16	−4	L. Thalamus
8	1784	0.010431	−62	−20	−8	L. Middle Temporal Gyrus, BA 21	3, 28, 38
		0.007852	−60	−12	0	L. Superior Temporal Gyrus, BA 22
9	1376	0.011565	−2	−38	24	L. Posterior Cingulate, BA 23	38, 45
10	1320	0.009312	26	32	−16	R. Inferior Frontal Gyrus, BA 47	26, 32

The clusters were approached at uncorrected p < 0.01 and a cluster-level p < 0.05. x, y, and z coordinates are given in MNI space L left, R right, BA Brodmann’s area