Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 24.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Jun 3;222(1):619–634. doi: 10.1007/s00429-016-1239-4

Table 4.

List of clusters that showed increased functional connectivity with the amygdala during face processing

Cluster# Volume (mm3) Extrema x y z Label Contributed studies

Increased connectivity
1 2608 0.011684 −8 −26 0 L. Thalamus 31, 37, 44
0.009499 −14 −36 −6 L. Parahippocampal Gyrus, BA 30
0.008935 −14 −22 −8 L. Substania Nigra
0.008413 4 −22 −4 R. Red Nucleus
2 1616 0.01243 −40 −64 −10 L. Fusiform Gyrus, BA 37 24, 37, 38
0.009832 −40 −76 −10 L. Fusiform Gyrus, BA 19
3 1136 0.01109 28 2 −24 R. Parahippocampal Gyrus, BA 34 24, 37
0.008339 30 −8 −26 R. Amygdala
0.008276 30 −2 −34 R. Uncus, BA 28
4 1048 0.01028 36 −50 −20 R. Cerebellum, Anterior Lobe 37, 38
0.009768 34 −46 −20 R, Cerebellum, Anterior Lobe
0.008725 36 −54 −12 R. Cerebellum, Posterior Lobe
5 832 0.011125 −14 −6 12 L. Thalamus, Ventral Anterior Nucleus 24, 37
0.008367 −12 0 20 L. Caudate Body
6 816 0.01109 −20 −8 −16 L. Amygdala 24, 37
0.008339 −30 −10 −14 L. Amygdala

The clusters were approached at uncorrected p < 0.01 and a cluster-level p < 0.05. x, y, and z coordinates are given in MNI space L left, R right, BA Brodmann’s area