Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 19;23(11):681–693. doi: 10.1007/s11910-023-01305-y

Table 1.

Characteristics of the relationship between measures of executive function and dynamic/static balance

First Author Number of participants Mean Age % Female Balance Task Executive Function Association
Executive Function and dynamic balance: EF
  Kang, et al. [29] 2022 94 72.6 ± 5.3 100% TUG Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery

NS

r: 0.099

  Jovanovic, et al. [30] 2022 98 68.5 83.6% TUG Trail Making Test

S

r: 0.217

  Matos, et al. [31] 2020 28 66.7 ± 7.6 84% TUG N-Back Test

S

r: 0.531

  Netz, et al. [32] 2018 33 M 77.2 ± 5.5 0% TUG MOXO DNSCPT ADHD Test, based on Go No Go Test

S

0.653

  Kose, et al. [33] 2016 80 75.7 ± 5.8 45% TUG Trail Making Test B

S

r: 0.358

  Blackwood, et al. [34] 2015 47 74.9 ± 5.9 48.6% TUG Trail Making Test B

S

r: 0.308

  Kawagoe, et al. [35] 2015 32 73.1 37.5% TUG N-Back Test

S

r: 0.58

  Berryman, et al. [36] 2013 48 70.5 ± 5.3 58% TUG Stroop Test

S

r: 0.565

  Herman, et al. [37] 2011 265 76.4 58% TUG Verbal Fluency

S

r: 0.217

  Hirato, et al. [38] 2010 493 73.3 66.7% TUG ∆Trail Making Test

S

r: 0.335

  Won, et al. [39] 2014 164 66 ± 4.6 66.5% FRT Clock Drawing Test

S

r: 0.201

  Tsutsumimato, et al. [40] 2013 59 88 ± 87 83% FRT Trail Making Test

S

r: 0.10

  Redfern, et al. [41] 2019 34 76 ± 4 61.7% Postural Sway Task Switching Test

NS

r: 0.29

  Redfern, et al. [42] 2009 24 74.2 ± 4.4 50% Postural Sway MAPIT battery for Motor Inhibition

S

r: 0.39

  Van Iresel, et al. [43] 2008 100 80.6 50% Postural Sway Trail Making Test

S

r: 0.893

  Rabbit, et al.[44] 2006 69 73.2 ± 8.1 57.97% TBT Color/Word Stroop Test 1

S

r: 0.326

  Zettel-Watson, et al. [45] 2017 50 69.5 ± 8.1 64% FABS Summing Stroop Color-Word Test, BP distraction, and EPT

S

0.31

  Muir-Hunter, et al. [46] 2014 24 76.18 100% BBS Trail Making Test A

S

r: 0.550

Executive Function and static balance
  Redfern, et al. [41] 2019 34 76 ± 4 61.7% Postural sway Perceptual and Motor Inhibition Test

S

r: 0.54

  Netz, et al. [32] 2018 38 F 77.2 ± 5.5 100% Postural sway MOXO DNSCPT ADHD Test, based on Go No Go

S

r: 0.427

  Muir-Hunter, et al. [46] 2014 24 76.18 100% Postural sway Trail Making Test A

S

r: 0.089

  Redfern, et al. [42] 2009 24 74.2 ± 4.4 50% Postural sway MAPIT battery for Motor Inhibition

NS

r: 0.21

  Boolani, et al. [47] 2019 11 76.55 ± 7.58 72% mCTCIB Serial subtraction 7

S

r: 0.433

  Demnitz, et al. [48] 2017 387 69.0 ± 5.1 19% SLS Digit span

NS

r: 0.056

  Won, et al. [39] 2014 164 66 ± 4.6 66.5% SLS Clock Drawing Test

S

r: 0.07

  Tsutsumimato, et al. [40] 2013 59 88 ± 87 83% SLS Trail Making Test

S

r: 0.36

  Bruce- Keller, et al. [49] 2012 50 74.2 ± 7.8 42% Stance time on SPPB Digit Symbol Test

S

r: 0.07

  Hirato, et al. [38] 2010 493 73.8 66.7% SLS ∆Trail Making Test

S

r: 0.312

  Rosano, et al.[50] 2005 2893 73.4 ± 2.8 52% Stance time Trail Making Test

S

r: 0.190

No Number of participants, M male, F Female, Number reference of the study, TUG Timed Up and Go Test, FRT Functional Reach Test, TBT Tinetti Balance Test, BBT Berg Balance Test, FABS Fullerton Advanced Balance Score, SPBB Balance Score on the Short Physical Performance Battery, SLS Single leg stance time, mCTCIB, Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance, NS Non-significant, S Significant. r correlation. Bolds are studies which had MMSE score > 24 as inclusion criteria