Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 24;4:149. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00521-4

Table 2.

Study characteristics and settings (n = 24)

Category N (%)
Design
    Cross-sectional (i.e., single point), no comparison group 10 (41.7%)
    Random assignment, treatment and control group (i.e., experimental) 9 (27.5%)
    Pre-test/post-test, no comparison group (i.e., pre-experimental) 5 (20.8%)
Results drawn from hybrid design 6 (25.0%)
Data analysis
    Quantitative 10 (41.7%)
    Qualitative 8 (33.3%)
    Quantitative and qualitative 6 (25.0%)
Sample
    Criminal justice staff and community-based partners 8 (33.3%)
    Administrative data 6 (25.0%)
    Criminal justice staff 5 (20.8%)
    Criminal justice staff and research partners 2 (8.3%)
    Criminal justice staff, clients, community-based partners 2 (8.3%)
    Community-based staff and clients 1 (4.2%)
Study setting(s)1
 Prison 17 (70.8%)
 Jail 12 (50.0%)
 Community corrections 7 (29.2%)
 Work release 2 (8.3%)
 Corrections setting not specified 1 (4.2%)
Primary health focus
 Infectious disease 9 (37.5%)
 Substance use 6 (25.0%)
 Mental health 5 (20.8%)
 Co-occurring mental health and substance use 2 (8.3%)
 Other 2 (8.3%)
Part of Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) 11 (45.8%)

1Numbers will not add to 24 because 12 studies included multiple settings