Table 3.
Subgroup-analysis of association between higher Oxidative balance score and risk of cancer
Higher oxidative balance score and odds of cancer in case-controls | Subgroups | Number of arms | OR (95% CI) | MODEL | Heterogeneity assessment | ||
I2% | Q test | P-value | |||||
Gender | Both | 8 | 0.64 (0.53.0.76) | Random | 90.1 | 70.40 | < 001 |
Female | 2 | 0.71 (0.56, 0.89) | 15.10 | 1.18 | 0.278 | ||
Cancer type | Colorectal | 7 | 0.66 (0.57.0.81) | Random | 91.2 | 55.91 | < 001 |
Breast | 2 | 0.71 (0.57, 0.89) | 15.1 | 1.18 | 0.278 | ||
Higher oxidative balance score and risk of cancer in cohorts | Sub-group | Number of arms | HR (95% CI) | MODEL | Heterogeneity assessment | ||
I2% | Q test | P-value | |||||
Stage of cancer | Typical case | 6 | 0.86 ( 0.67,1.05) | Random | 88.5 | 52.34 | < 001 |
Non-advance | 3 | 1.05 (0.96, 1.14) | 25.7 | 21.03 | 0.260 | ||
Advance, stage 3,4 | 3 | 1.14 (0.97, 1.34) | 0.0 | 1.12 | 0.640 | ||
Cancer type | prostate | 3 | 1.15 (1.05,1.26) | Random | 0.0 | 0.79 | 0.674 |
colorectal | 2 | 0.62 (0.54,0.71) | 0.0 | 0.69 | 0.408 | ||
Gender | Male | 4 | 1.05 (0.95,1.16) | Random | 69.6 | 29.63 | 0.001 |
Female | 3 | 0.74 (0.58,1.06) | 82.4 | 11.38 | 0.003 |