Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 24;23:1143. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11657-w

Table 3.

Subgroup-analysis of association between higher Oxidative balance score and risk of cancer

Higher oxidative balance score and odds of cancer in case-controls Subgroups Number of arms OR (95% CI) MODEL Heterogeneity assessment
I2% Q test P-value
Gender Both 8 0.64 (0.53.0.76) Random 90.1 70.40  < 001
Female 2 0.71 (0.56, 0.89) 15.10 1.18 0.278
Cancer type Colorectal 7 0.66 (0.57.0.81) Random 91.2 55.91  < 001
Breast 2 0.71 (0.57, 0.89) 15.1 1.18 0.278
Higher oxidative balance score and risk of cancer in cohorts Sub-group Number of arms HR (95% CI) MODEL Heterogeneity assessment
I2% Q test P-value
Stage of cancer Typical case 6 0.86 ( 0.67,1.05) Random 88.5 52.34  < 001
Non-advance 3 1.05 (0.96, 1.14) 25.7 21.03 0.260
Advance, stage 3,4 3 1.14 (0.97, 1.34) 0.0 1.12 0.640
Cancer type prostate 3 1.15 (1.05,1.26) Random 0.0 0.79 0.674
colorectal 2 0.62 (0.54,0.71) 0.0 0.69 0.408
Gender Male 4 1.05 (0.95,1.16) Random 69.6 29.63 0.001
Female 3 0.74 (0.58,1.06) 82.4 11.38 0.003