Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 25;190(12):485. doi: 10.1007/s00604-023-06056-8

Table 3.

Comparison of the proposed method with the literature methods using MIP extraction or clean-up and HPLC-UV analysis for the determination of PAT in apple juice. For comparison, the table summarizes the type of material prepared in each work, the monomers and crosslinkers used for preparation of the MIP part of the final material, the template used for imprinting, the solvent in which the MIP was prepared, the type of analytical procedure used for extraction of PAT, the adsorption capacity of the MIP, and the extraction time associated with the MIP procedure and validation results for LOD, LOQ, and recovery of the final methods. Template, MIP composition, and additional information were not available for commercial materials

Material type Monomers (cross-linker) Template Solvent Extraction technique (sorbent amount) QMAX Extraction time LOD LOQ RE (%) Ref
SiO2@MIP Maleic acid (EGDMA1) Patulin Acetonitrile SPE (50 mg) 261.8 μg g−1 10 min 8.6 μg L−1 28.6 μg L−1 82–98 [29]
EASIMIP™ Commercial material - - SPE - - 6 μg L−1 20 μg L−1 81–110 [30]
Magnetic-SiO2 APTES2 (TEOS3) 2-oxindole 87% methanol MSPE4 (20 mg) 1.97 mg g−1 105 min 3 μg kg−1 10 μg kg−1 86–96 [38]
SiO2 TEOS Isatin Water SPE online 1g - 7 min 11 ng mL−1 - > 88 [47]
AFFINISEP Commercial material - - SPE - - 0.6 μg kg−1 - 73–108 [36]
SiO2 APTES (TEOS) Oxindole 83% methanol SPE online (50 mg) 1.657 mg g−1 27 min 0.5 μg L−1 2 μg L−1 60–98 [31]
SiO2@MIP Acrylamide (EGDMA) 6-hydroxynicotinic acid Acetonitrile SPE (180 mg) 0.654 μg mg−1 20 min 10 μg L−1 40 μg L−1 90–96 [46]
MIP Methacrylic acid (EGDMA) Oxindole Ethyl acetate SPE (400 mg) 5.7 mg g−1 24 min 5 μg g−1 6 μg g−1 84–89 [40]
MIP Melamine, dopamine (formaldehyde) Uric acid 8% acetonitrile d-SPE (100 mg) 13.33 ng mg−1 40 min 0.5 ng mL−1 1.0 ng mL−1 85–90 This work

EGDMA ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, APTES (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane, TEOS tetraethyl orthosilicate, MSPE magnetic SPE