Table 2.
Comparison of the current results and those of other coagulation studies.
| Article | Microplastic | Size | Coagulant | Dose (mmol) | pH | Polymer | Polymer dose (mg/l) | Efficiency(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | PE | 100–500 | Alum(Al(OH)3) | 0.10 | 7 | Anionic polymer | 0.3 | 82 |
| 17 | PS | 100–500 | Alum(Al(OH)3) | 0.10 | 7 | Anionic polymer | 0.3 | 84 |
| 5 | PE | 100–500 | AlCl3·6H2O | 0.05 | 7 | Anionic polymer | 15 | 61.19 |
| 16 | PE | 5–100 | AlCl3·6H2O | 0.12 | 7 | Polyamine | 1 | 80.3 |
| 16 | PE | 5–100 | AlCl3·6H2O | 0.12 | 7 | Polyamine | 1 | 100 |
| This study 1 | PE,PS,PA | < 600 | Al2(SO4)3 | 0.12 | 7 | PAM | 15 | 45.18 |
| This study 2 | PE,PS,PA | < 600 | Al2(SO4)3 | 0.05 | 7 | PAM | 15 | 33.63 |
| This study 3 | PA | < 125 | Al2(SO4)3 | 0.05 | 7 | PAM | 15 | 79 |
| This study 4 | PS | < 125 | Al2(SO4)3 | 0.05 | 7 | PAM | 15 | 68 |