Abstract
The influence of peptides and amino acids on ammonia assimilation and de novo synthesis of amino acids by three predominant noncellulolytic species of ruminal bacteria, Prevotella bryantii B14, Selenomonas ruminantium HD4, and Streptococcus bovis ES1, was determined by growing these bacteria in media containing 15NH4Cl and various additions of pancreatic hydrolysates of casein (peptides) or amino acids. The proportion of cell N and amino acids formed de novo decreased as the concentration of peptides increased. At high concentrations of peptides (10 and 30 g/liter), the incorporation of ammonia accounted for less than 0.16 of bacterial amino acid N and less than 0.30 of total N. At 1 g/liter, which is more similar to peptide concentrations found in the rumen, 0.68, 0.87, and 0.46 of bacterial amino acid N and 0.83, 0.89, and 0.64 of total N were derived from ammonia by P. bryantii, S. ruminantium, and S. bovis, respectively. Concentration-dependent responses were also obtained with amino acids. No individual amino acid was exhausted in any incubation medium. For cultures of P. bryantii, peptides were incorporated and stimulated growth more effectively than amino acids, while cultures of the other species showed no preference for peptides or amino acids. Apparent growth yields increased by between 8 and 57%, depending on the species, when 1 g of peptides or amino acids per liter was added to the medium. Proline synthesis was greatly decreased when peptides or amino acids were added to the medium, while glutamate and aspartate were enriched to a greater extent than other amino acids under all conditions. Thus, the proportion of bacterial protein formed de novo in noncellulolytic ruminal bacteria varies according to species and the form and identity of the amino acid and in a concentration-dependent manner.
The extent to which ammonia is used for protein synthesis has important implications for the efficiency of ruminal fermentation (4, 23, 29, 32). Early nutritional studies with pure cultures of cellulolytic bacteria indicated that N incorporation into bacterial protein was equivalent to the disappearance of ammonia N from the medium, and it was therefore concluded that ammonia is the main source of N for growth of these species (9). Low incorporation levels of 14C-protein hydrolysate into Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the presence of ammonia (1) tended to support this view. A similar conclusion was made by Hobson et al. (22) with the noncellulolytic species Ruminobacter (then Bacteroides) amylophilus, which formed >90% of its protein N from the (15NH4)SO4 present in the medium even if protein hydrolysate was present. The survey by Bryant and Robinson (10) of a larger number of rumen bacterial species showed that the pattern was much more variable: many cultures incorporated large amounts of 14C-algal protein hydrolysate, while others did not. Russell et al. (32, 33) concluded that mixed bacteria fermenting soluble carbohydrate derived 66% of their N from peptides and 34% from ammonia when both were available.
In the mixed rumen microbial population, the extent to which microbial protein is synthesized de novo varies enormously (2, 27, 29–31, 34), depending on the relative amounts of energy and N available for microbial growth (6, 34). Some amino acids are synthesized de novo to a much greater extent than others (34). The aims of the present study were to provide information on which amino acids were formed de novo by pure cultures of different noncellulolytic bacterial species from the rumen and how the availability of different nutrients affected de novo protein synthesis by these species. It emerges that the average rate of de novo synthesis of microbial protein conceals a wide variation in de novo synthesis between individual amino acids and individual species and that the extent of incorporation of amino acids from peptides and amino acids in the medium is highly concentration dependent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
The bacteria used in this study were Prevotella bryantii B14 (11) (a gift from J. B. Russell), Selenomonas ruminantium HD4 (ATCC 35018), and Streptococcus bovis ES1 (a strain prototrophic for amino acids isolated from a sheep at the Rowett Research Institute). The cultures were maintained on medium M2 (21).
The basal medium used for the growth of P. bryantii, S. ruminantium, and S. bovis contained the following ingredients, per liter: 150 ml of each mineral solution of medium M2, except that 40% of the NH4Cl was replaced by 15NH4Cl (99% 15N); trace metals (16), 5 ml; vitamin solution (35), 100 ml; longer-chain volatile fatty acids solution (5 mM each isobutyric acid, sodium valerate, sodium isovalerate, and sodium dl-α-methyl-n-butyrate in 15 mM NaOH), 100 ml; hemin solution, 4 ml of 0.025% solution in 50% ethanol; glucose, 5 g; cellobiose, 5 g; l-methionine, 1 g; and distilled water, up to 900 ml. The mixture was boiled, bubbled with O2-free CO2, and cooled, and 100 ml of reducing solution was added. The reducing solution contained the following, per 100 ml: NaHCO3, 4 g; Na2S, 0.25 g; and dithiothreitol, 0.25 g. Media containing amino acids contained various concentrations of an amino acid mixture comprising casein acid hydrolysate (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) with 8.68 g of l-tryptophan and 1.4 g of l-cysteine added per 992 g of casein acid hydrolysate. Media with added pancreatic casein hydrolysate contained the same basal medium plus various concentrations of Trypticase (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) per liter. The medium was then dispensed under CO2 in 10-ml volumes into Hungate tubes, and the tubes were sealed with butyl rubber seals and then autoclaved.
Complete M2 medium was the liquid form of Hobson’s medium M2 (21), which contains 10 g of pancreatic casein hydrolysate (Casitone; Oxoid) per liter, except that 40% of the NH4Cl added in the mineral solution was replaced by 15NH4Cl (99% 15N).
Bacteria were inoculated (5% by volume) from stock cultures into fresh medium and grown at 39°C overnight. The inoculation and growth were repeated, and the cultures were harvested by centrifugation (15,000 × g, 15 min). The pellets were washed once with ice-cold water, and the resuspended cells and supernatants were freeze-dried.
15N and N analyses.
15N enrichment was measured by isotope ratio mass spectrometry as described by Barrie and Workman (5). Total cell N was measured by a Kjeldahl procedure (19). Freeze-dried pellets were prepared for analysis of 15N enrichment in amino acids by hydrolysis in 6 M HCl at 110°C overnight. Samples were evaporated at 70°C and then resuspended in 2 ml of 0.1 N HCl. The samples were centrifuged again, and 1 ml of supernatant was applied to a Bio-Rad AG 50W-X8 column (0.8 ml). The column was washed twice with 2 ml of water, and the amino acids were eluted with 2 ml of 2 M ammonia followed by 1 ml of water. The eluted liquid was freeze-dried and stored at −20°C. Tertiary butyl dimethysilyl derivatives of the amino acids were prepared, and the 15N enrichment in individual amino acids was determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry as described by Calder and Smith (13). Ammonia was measured by an automated phenol-hypochlorite method adapted from the work of Whitehead et al. (39). 15N enrichment in ammonia was determined by incorporating 15NH3 into norvaline by using glutamate dehydrogenase and 2-oxopentanoate as described by Nieto et al. (28). Amino acids in spent medium were analyzed by ion-exchange chromatography following HCl hydrolysis (37).
The proportion of cell N derived from ammonia was calculated from the following equation: bacterial N from NH3 = 2ct/(ao + at), where ct is the 15N enrichment in total cell N, ao is the enrichment in ammonia in uninoculated medium, and at is the enrichment in ammonia in spent medium.
Bacterial amino acids were analyzed individually for 15N content, and the amino acid N derived from ammonia was calculated for each amino acid by using an equation similar to that used for total cell N. The average proportion of bacterial protein derived from ammonia was calculated from the average 15N content of amino acids. The method used to hydrolyze protein was HCl hydrolysis, which results in the breakdown of glutamine, asparagine, and tryptophan, and the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method did not detect lysine or cysteine adequately. Thus, the enrichment of these amino acids and that of methionine, essential for P. bryantii and therefore added to the medium, were not determined.
Statistical analysis.
Results are all means derived from the analysis of triplicate cultures. The data were compared by analysis of variance, with different cultures used as a blocking factor. To compare the effects of treatments on ammonia uptake into amino acids, individual amino acids were considered as a subplot within the design. All analysis was carried out by using the GENSTAT 5 statistical program (Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, England).
RESULTS
All species grew well in the general-purpose rumen fluid-containing medium M2 (see Tables 1, 3, and 5). Little net production or utilization of ammonia production occurred. The 15N enrichment in ammonia in the spent medium decreased for all species, however, indicating that some of the ammonia in spent medium was originally derived from other compounds; this effect was particularly marked for P. bryantii (Table 1). When bacteria were grown in medium M2, very low proportions of amino acids (see the equation on the previous page) were derived from ammonia in cultures of P. bryantii (0.03) (Table 1), S. ruminantium (0.05) (Table 2), and S. bovis (0.01) (Table 3). A slightly larger proportion of total cell N was derived from ammonia (0.09, 0.08, and 0.12, respectively).
TABLE 1.
Influence of Trypticase on incorporation of 15NH3 by P. bryantii B14a
| Parameter | Value for growth medium
|
SEDc | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal | Basal + Trypticase (1 g/liter) | Basal + Trypticase (5 g/liter) | Basal + Trypticase (10 g/liter) | Basal + Trypticase (30 g/liter) | Complete M2 | ||
| NH3 concn (g of N/liter) | |||||||
| Initial | 0.156 | 0.154 | 0.190 | 0.238 | 0.376 | 0.353 | 0.005 |
| Final | 0.031 | 0.042 | 0.184 | 0.206 | 0.491 | 0.393 | 0.010 |
| Enrichment in NH3 (atom%) | |||||||
| Initial | 34.3 | 34.4 | 33.6 | 31.1 | 26.0 | 26.8 | 0.55 |
| Final | 31.8 | 32.6 | 29.8 | 25.1 | 15.5 | 17.8 | 0.56 |
| Microbial N formed (g/liter) | 0.102 | 0.137 | 0.192 | 0.197 | 0.192 | 0.165 | 0.013 |
| Enrichment in microbial N (atom%) | 38.1 | 27.9 | 12.1 | 8.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.42 |
| Proportion of microbial N derived from ammonia | 1.15 | 0.83 | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.014 |
| Proportion of microbial amino acids derived from ammoniab | |||||||
| Ala | 1.11 | 0.75 | 0.29 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
| Gly | 1.08 | 0.71 | 0.30 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Val | 1.10 | 0.68 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Leu | 1.11 | 0.72 | 0.33 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.02 | |
| Ile | 1.12 | 0.75 | 0.33 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.02 | |
| Pro | 1.11 | 0.21 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Ser | 1.12 | 0.84 | 0.46 | 0.26 | 0.09 | 0.04 | |
| Thr | 1.12 | 0.67 | 0.28 | 0.08 | 0 | 0.01 | |
| Phe | 1.08 | 0.33 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0 | |
| Asp | 1.12 | 0.86 | 0.52 | 0.34 | 0.17 | 0.09 | |
| Glu | 1.10 | 0.92 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.21 | 0.13 | |
| Tyr | 1.12 | 0.75 | 0.36 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0 | |
| Mean proportion of amino acid N derived from ammonia | 1.11 | 0.68 | 0.31 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.007 |
Results are mean values from three separate cultures.
Standard errors of difference for proportion of individual microbial amino acids derived from ammonia are as follows: treatment, 0.004; amino acid, 0.005; treatment × amino acid, 0.013 (degrees of freedom, 142).
SED, standard errors of differences of means.
TABLE 3.
Influence of Trypticase on incorporation of 15NH3 by S. ruminantium HD4a
| Parameter | Value for growth medium
|
SEDc | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal | Basal + Trypticase (1 g/liter) | Basal + Trypticase (5 g/liter) | Basal + Trypticase (10 g/liter) | Basal + Trypticase (30 g/liter) | Complete M2 | ||
| NH3 concn (g of N/liter) | |||||||
| Initial | 0.156 | 0.154 | 0.190 | 0.239 | 0.377 | 0.353 | 0.005 |
| Final | 0.061 | 0.064 | 0.166 | 0.232 | 0.360 | 0.381 | 0.010 |
| Enrichment in NH3 (atom%) | |||||||
| Initial | 34.2 | 34.3 | 33.5 | 31.1 | 26.0 | 26.8 | 0.56 |
| Final | 31.7 | 27.8 | 24.6 | 26.7 | 20.0 | 22.5 | 1.98 |
| Microbial N formed (g/liter) | 0.100 | 0.122 | 0.111 | 0.131 | 0.135 | 0.137 | 0.007 |
| Enrichment in microbial N (atom%) | 36.0 | 27.6 | 12.1 | 8.7 | 5.4 | 1.8 | 1.27 |
| Proportion of microbial N derived from ammonia | 1.09 | 0.89 | 0.42 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.041 |
| Proportion of microbial amino acids derived from ammoniab | |||||||
| Ala | 1.06 | 0.86 | 0.37 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.10 | |
| Gly | 1.08 | 0.86 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0 | |
| Val | 1.05 | 0.77 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0 | 0 | |
| Leu | 1.06 | 0.83 | 0.25 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.02 | |
| Ile | 1.06 | 0.85 | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.03 | |
| Pro | 1.08 | 0.80 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Ser | 1.08 | 0.90 | 0.26 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
| Thr | 1.08 | 0.90 | 0.26 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.01 | |
| Phe | 1.05 | 0.84 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.07 | |
| Asp | 1.09 | 0.98 | 0.58 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.17 | |
| Glu | 1.09 | 0.99 | 0.59 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.14 | |
| Tyr | 1.03 | 0.87 | 0.27 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.02 | |
| Mean proportion of amino acid N derived from ammonia | 1.06 | 0.87 | 0.29 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.019 |
Results are mean values from three separate cultures.
Standard errors of difference for proportion of individual microbial amino acids derived from ammonia are as follows: treatment, 0.007; amino acid, 0.010; treatment × amino acid, 0.025 (degrees of freedom, 142).
SED, standard errors of differences of means.
TABLE 5.
Influence of Trypticase on incorporation of 15NH3 by S. bovis ES1a
| Parameter | Value for growth medium
|
SEDc | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal | Basal + Trypticase (1 g/liter) | Basal + Trypticase (5 g/liter) | Basal + Trypticase (10 g/liter) | Basal + Trypticase (30 g/liter) | Complete M2 | ||
| NH3 concn (g of N/liter) | |||||||
| Initial | 0.156 | 0.154 | 0.190 | 0.238 | 0.376 | 0.353 | 0.005 |
| Final | 0.114 | 0.125 | 0.188 | 0.224 | 0.343 | 0.337 | 0.008 |
| Enrichment in NH3 (atom%) | |||||||
| Initial | 34.2 | 34.3 | 33.5 | 31.1 | 25.9 | 26.8 | 0.56 |
| Final | 30.7 | 28.9 | 28.9 | 28.6 | 23.3 | 25.9 | 1.78 |
| Microbial N formed (g/liter) | 0.058 | 0.091 | 0.097 | 0.123 | 0.153 | 0.088 | 0.007 |
| Enrichment in microbial N (atom%) | 38.5 | 20.1 | 9.3 | 7.0 | 3.9 | 3.2 | 0.80 |
| Proportion of microbial N derived from ammonia | 1.19 | 0.64 | 0.30 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.022 |
| Proportion of microbial amino acids derived from ammoniab | |||||||
| Ala | 1.08 | 0.64 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0 | |
| Gly | 1.09 | 0.56 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | |
| Val | 0.99 | 0.30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Leu | 1.00 | 0.40 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
| Ile | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Pro | 0.99 | 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Ser | 1.07 | 0.47 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | |
| Thr | 1.08 | 0.66 | 0.07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Phe | 1.01 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0 | |
| Asp | 1.09 | 0.66 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.05 | |
| Glu | 1.09 | 0.80 | 0.42 | 0.30 | 0.16 | 0.08 | |
| Tyr | 1.02 | 0.47 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0 | |
| Mean proportion of amino acid N derived from ammonia | 1.04 | 0.46 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.022 |
Results are mean values from three separate cultures.
Standard errors of difference for proportion of individual microbial amino acids derived from ammonia are as follows: treatment, 0.007; amino acid, 0.010; treatment × amino acid, 0.238 (degrees of freedom, 142).
SED, standard errors of differences of means.
TABLE 2.
Influence of amino acids on incorporation of 15NH3 by P. bryantii B14a
| Parameter | Value for growth medium
|
SEDc | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal | Basal + amino acids (1 g/liter) | Basal + amino acids (5 g/liter) | Basal + amino acids (10 g/liter) | Basal + amino acids (30 g/liter) | ||
| NH3 concn (g of N/liter) | ||||||
| Initial | 0.214 | 0.209 | 0.247 | 0.303 | 0.592 | 0.004 |
| Final | 0.072 | 0.102 | 0.187 | 0.234 | 0.602 | 0.007 |
| Enrichment in NH3 (atom%) | ||||||
| Initial | 37.7 | 37.8 | 35.1 | 32.6 | 26.7 | 0.36 |
| Final | 35.8 | 31.5 | 34.7 | 27.8 | 22.4 | 1.83 |
| Microbial N formed (g/liter) | 0.127 | 0.137 | 0.111 | 0.146 | 0.118 | 0.005 |
| Enrichment in microbial N (atom%) | 38.7 | 29.5 | 19.7 | 15.8 | 8.6 | 0.63 |
| Proportion of microbial N derived from ammonia | 1.05 | 0.86 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.35 | 0.037 |
| Proportion of microbial amino acids derived from ammoniab | ||||||
| Ala | 1.01 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.36 | 0.10 | |
| Gly | 1.01 | 0.78 | 0.53 | 0.38 | 0.08 | |
| Val | 0.99 | 0.79 | 0.43 | 0.22 | 0.06 | |
| Leu | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.45 | 0.29 | 0.12 | |
| Ile | 1.01 | 0.82 | 0.47 | 0.30 | 0.12 | |
| Pro | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | |
| Ser | 1.01 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.37 | |
| Thr | 1.01 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 0.47 | 0.09 | |
| Phe | 0.98 | 0.49 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.24 | |
| Asp | 1.01 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.64 | |
| Glu | 1.01 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.55 | |
| Tyr | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.54 | 0.40 | 0.23 | |
| Mean proportion of amino acid N derived from ammonia | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.022 |
Results are mean values from three separate cultures.
Standard errors of difference for proportion of individual microbial amino acids derived from ammonia are as follows: treatment, 0.007; amino acid, 0.010; treatment × amino acid, 0.023 (degrees of freedom, 118).
SED, standard errors of differences of means.
In defined medium, with no added amino acids or Trypticase, virtually all amino acids were formed from ammonia (Tables 1 to 6). The recovery was sometimes apparently greater than 100%, for reasons which were not clear but which must presumably stem from an inaccuracy in the measurement of nitrogen or 15N in ammonia and cells, the data which were used to calculate the final proportions derived from ammonia. Ammonia enrichment seems likely to have been the measurement causing the problem, since both microbial N and amino acid N data appeared to be affected in similar ways. The degree of error is small, and the anomalous values have little influence on the overall conclusions, however.
TABLE 6.
Influence of amino acids on incorporation of 15NH3 by S. bovis ES1a
| Parameter | Value for growth medium
|
SEDc | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal | Basal + amino acids (1 g/liter) | Basal + amino acids (5 g/liter) | Basal + amino acids (10 g/liter) | Basal + amino acids (30 g/liter) | ||
| NH3 concn (g of N/liter) | ||||||
| Initial | 0.214 | 0.209 | 0.248 | 0.303 | 0.592 | 0.004 |
| Final | 0.170 | 0.189 | 0.236 | 0.285 | 0.593 | 0.10 |
| Enrichment in NH3 (atom%) | ||||||
| Initial | 37.7 | 37.8 | 35.1 | 32.5 | 26.7 | 0.36 |
| Final | 33.2 | 34.6 | 30.6 | 29.9 | 24.8 | 1.83 |
| Microbial N formed (g/liter) | 0.058 | 0.062 | 0.117 | 0.108 | 0.111 | 0.005 |
| Enrichment in microbial N (atom%) | 33.0 | 19.0 | 10.6 | 10.0 | 6.9 | 0.63 |
| Proportion of microbial N derived from ammonia | 0.93 | 0.53 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.037 |
| Proportion of microbial amino acids derived from ammoniab | ||||||
| Ala | 0.97 | 0.36 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.09 | |
| Gly | 0.99 | 0.26 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.01 | |
| Val | 0.85 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | |
| Leu | 0.86 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.04 | |
| Ile | 0.86 | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.02 | |
| Pro | 0.89 | 0.08 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | |
| Ser | 0.97 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0 | |
| Thr | 0.97 | 0.33 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.01 | |
| Phe | 0.71 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.06 | |
| Asp | 0.98 | 0.59 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.29 | |
| Glu | 0.99 | 0.63 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.17 | |
| Tyr | 0.84 | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.05 | |
| Mean proportion of amino acid N derived from ammonia | 0.91 | 0.28 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.020 |
Results are mean values from three separate cultures.
Standard errors of difference for proportion of individual microbial amino acids derived from ammonia are as follows: treatment, 0.007; amino acid, 0.011; treatment × amino acid, 0.025 (degrees of freedom, 118)0.
SED, standard errors of differences of means.
When additions of Trypticase (Tables 1, 3, and 5) or amino acids (Tables 2, 4, and 6) were made to the same medium, the proportions of cell N and cellular amino acids derived from ammonia decreased as the Trypticase or amino acid concentration increased. With all species, the proportion of total cell N derived from ammonia was greater than the average proportion of amino acids derived from ammonia, indicating that non-amino-acid cell N was derived predominantly from ammonia; this difference was most pronounced for S. bovis (Tables 5 and 6).
TABLE 4.
Influence of amino acids on incorporation of 15NH3 by S. ruminantium HD4a
| Parameter | Value for growth medium
|
SEDc | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal | Basal + amino acids (1 g/liter) | Basal + amino acids (5 g/liter) | Basal + amino acids (10 g/liter) | Basal + amino acids (30 g/liter) | ||
| NH3 concn (g of N/liter) | ||||||
| Initial | 0.214 | 0.209 | 0.247 | 0.304 | 0.592 | 0.004 |
| Final | 0.117 | 0.145 | 0.257 | 0.313 | 0.701 | 0.008 |
| Enrichment in NH3 (atom%) | ||||||
| Initial | 37.7 | 37.8 | 35.1 | 32.6 | 26.7 | 0.36 |
| Final | 35.8 | 33.7 | 30.0 | 27.1 | 19.2 | 1.13 |
| Microbial N formed (g/liter) | 0.083 | 0.093 | 0.109 | 0.154 | 0.169 | 0.004 |
| Enrichment in microbial N (atom%) | 39.0 | 25.5 | 10.7 | 8.6 | 5.3 | 0.62 |
| Proportion of microbial N derived from ammonia | 1.06 | 0.71 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.016 |
| Proportion of microbial amino acids derived from ammoniab | ||||||
| Ala | 0.96 | 0.50 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.24 | |
| Gly | 0.99 | 0.52 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.03 | |
| Val | 0.93 | 0.50 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
| Leu | 0.93 | 0.58 | 0.24 | 0.12 | 0.03 | |
| Ile | 0.94 | 0.59 | 0.25 | 0.12 | 0.02 | |
| Pro | 0.98 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Ser | 0.98 | 0.53 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.09 | |
| Thr | 0.97 | 0.56 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.07 | |
| Phe | 0.87 | 0.55 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.08 | |
| Asp | 0.98 | 0.69 | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.16 | |
| Glu | 0.98 | 0.70 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.33 | |
| Tyr | 0.89 | 0.57 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.08 | |
| Mean proportion of amino acid N derived from ammonia | 0.95 | 0.53 | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.009 |
Results are mean values from three separate cultures.
Standard errors of difference for proportion of individual microbial amino acids derived from ammonia are as follows: treatment, 0.005; amino acid, 0.007; treatment × amino acid, 0.016 (degrees of freedom, 118).
SED, standard errors of differences of means.
Differences between species were evident when the effects of adding peptides were compared with the effects of adding amino acids. With P. bryantii, increasing the concentration of peptides decreased ammonia uptake more than increasing the concentration of amino acids did (Tables 1 and 2), indicating a preference for peptides over amino acids in protein synthesis. In contrast, ammonia uptake by S. ruminantium and S. bovis was influenced to approximately the same extent by peptides and amino acids (Tables 3 to 6). For all three species, the incorporation of 15N from ammonia into cell N was greater in the basal medium plus 10 g of Trypticase per liter (0.30, 0.30, and 0.23, respectively) than in medium M2 (0.09, 0.08, and 0.12, respectively), which contains the same concentration of Casitone, a similar pancreatic extract of casein, but also yeast extract and clarified rumen fluid.
The patterns of de novo synthesis among individual amino acids were similar for all media and for all species in that glutamate and aspartate were always the most highly enriched. Serine was the third most highly enriched amino acid for P. bryantii, while alanine was the third most highly enriched amino acid for the other species. Proline biosynthesis was inhibited to the greatest extent by the addition of Trypticase or amino acids, followed by phenylalanine biosynthesis for P. bryantii and S. bovis and valine biosynthesis for S. ruminantium.
The amino acid content of the spent medium from cultures containing peptides or amino acids at 1 g/liter was determined following acid hydrolysis of the medium (Table 7). No individual amino acid was exhausted, although the concentrations of the aromatic amino acids, phenylalanine and tyrosine, were much lower (0.05 to 0.13 mM) than that of other amino acids (0.15 to 1.06 mM) in the spent medium containing 1-g of Trypticase per liter. In the medium containing 1 g of amino acids per liter, the lowest concentrations of amino acids in spent medium were for phenylalanine in cultures of P. bryantii (0.09 mM) and glycine in cultures of S. ruminantium (0.03 mM) and S. bovis (0.09 mM). Other than methionine, which was added to the media at a high concentration (1 g/liter; 7 mM), glutamate was the most abundant amino acid in uninoculated medium, followed by proline and leucine (Table 7). Glutamate was metabolized extensively, particularly when presented as the free amino acid, by all three species. Significant increases in alanine concentrations were observed in the spent medium with S. ruminantium.
TABLE 7.
Amino acid composition of acid-hydrolyzed uninoculated and spent Trypticase- and amino acid-containing medium
| Amino acid | Amino acid concn (μM) in culturea
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uninoculated
|
P. bryantii
|
S. bovis
|
S. ruminantium
|
|||||
| Trypticase | Amino acids | Trypticase | Amino acids | Trypticase | Amino acids | Trypticase | Amino acids | |
| Ala | 284 | 236 | 274 | 200 | 294 | 229 | 620 | 478 |
| Gly | 204 | 142 | 167 | 61 | 160 | 18 | 236 | 6 |
| Val | 447 | 176 | 291 | 301 | 335 | 224 | 342 | 32 |
| Leu | 319 | 110 | 122 | 44 | 165 | 80 | 246 | 14 |
| Ile | 552 | 276 | 186 | 132 | 262 | 188 | 275 | 18 |
| Pro | 935 | 370 | 526 | 451 | 545 | 488 | 672 | 336 |
| Ser | 352 | 182 | 328 | 176 | 269 | 57 | 359 | 111 |
| Phe | 232 | 101 | 52 | 18 | 94 | 82 | 127 | 88 |
| Asp | 352 | 224 | 291 | 266 | 207 | 313 | 260 | 68 |
| Glu | 1,211 | 554 | 849 | 621 | 835 | 316 | 1,062 | 318 |
| Tyr | 80 | 58 | 59 | 52 | 61 | 58 | 83 | 51 |
Results are means of duplicate estimations.
The cell density also increased as the concentration of Trypticase and amino acids increased. Trypticase at 30 g/liter increased the yield by 88, 35, and 164% for P. bryantii, S. ruminantium, and S. bovis, respectively, while amino acids had little influence on P. bryantii and increased the yields of S. ruminantium and S. bovis by 204 and 191%, respectively. The lowest concentration, 1 g/liter, of Trypticase resulted in increases of 34, 22, and 57% for the three species, respectively. Utilization of sugars was not measured in these experiments, so molar growth yields cannot be calculated.
DISCUSSION
The aim of this study was to investigate factors influencing de novo synthesis of different amino acids in three species of ruminal bacteria. Our results describe the extent to which individual amino acids are synthesized de novo by these bacteria. What also emerges, however, is that de novo synthesis of total bacterial N and amino acids in the present experiments differs significantly from the results of other studies. It is therefore important to explore these differences in order to understand how amino acid incorporation by rumen bacteria may be influenced by growth conditions in vivo.
De novo amino acid synthesis varied according to the concentrations of peptides and amino acids in the medium: there is no simple on-off switch for de novo amino acid synthesis. This variation occurred with both peptides and amino acids, and in neither case was any individual amino acid exhausted, even at the lowest concentration of amino acids used. Thus, the observed effects appear not to be a consequence of the removal of an essential or stimulatory single amino acid. Cotta and Russell (17) reported increases in the cell yields of the same and other species of ruminal bacteria when the concentration of amino acids was increased, again noting that no amino acid was exhausted at the lower concentrations. Because certain amino acids, including asparagine, glutamine, cysteine, and tryptophan, are destroyed by acid hydrolysis (7) and were therefore not measured, it is possible that one of these amino acids may limit growth rate or efficiency. However, the experiments of Argyle and Baldwin and Maeng et al. (3, 25, 26) would indicate that no single amino acid is limiting in the sense that is used, for example, to balance the amino acid composition of dietary formulations fed to farm animals. Instead, it was considered possible that groups of amino acids may relieve energetic or metabolic limitations on growth rate or growth yield. Although the practical implications of identifying groups of this nature could be significant, to date no defined group of amino acids appears to provide the benefits of the full array of amino acids (3, 26). It is also worth noting, as was found by Cotta and Russell (17), that only a small proportion of the amino acids added to the medium is incorporated; here, the highest incorporation (26%) was by S. ruminantium in medium with 1 g of amino acids/liter, and most conditions gave much lower incorporation. Increasing the utilization of available amino acids would decrease the quantity available for catabolism and therefore contribute to improving N retention by ruminants (23).
The higher concentrations of peptides tested here correspond to peptide concentrations employed routinely in many growth media in vitro. Between 0.58 and 0.70 of cell N was formed from peptides in medium with 5 g of Trypticase per liter, and 0.88 or more of the bacterial cell N was formed from peptides when bacteria were grown in the routine rumen fluid-containing medium M2 described by Hobson (21). However, peptide concentrations in ruminal fluid are only 1 g/liter or less (8, 14, 15, 37, 40), and at these concentrations, the bacteria in the pure cultures investigated here used peptides for only between 0.11 and 0.36 of their cell N synthesis. Thus, care should be taken in extrapolating from some in vitro experiments to the in vivo situation.
The low uptake of peptides from medium with 1 g/liter contrasts with the findings of Russell et al. (33), who used a medium containing casein at 1 g/liter for the growth of mixed ruminal bacteria on soluble carbohydrates; their results suggested that noncellulolytic bacteria formed 0.66 of their cell N from amino acids, with the remainder being derived from ammonia (33). The experimental conditions were different in the present study, with pure cultures being used here rather than mixed ruminal bacteria. It is, however, important to find the reason for the different incorporation ratios, because the possible influence of growth conditions on amino acid incorporation has important implications for nutritional modelling (32). Many factors other than peptide concentration may influence ammonia and peptide uptake, including growth rate, ammonia concentration, energy source, and availability of precursors for amino acid synthesis. The results of the present experiments do not explain, for example, why mixed ruminal microorganisms can, under some dietary circumstances, derive 50% or more of their cell N from N sources other than ammonia (27, 30), nor is there any explanation as to why medium M2 gave such different results in comparison with the 10-g/liter defined medium, which contains approximately the same concentration of peptides. These issues need to be resolved by further experimentation.
The influence of preformed amino acids on growth yield is an important feature of nutritional modelling (32) and other studies (3, 17, 25, 26). The present experiments have limited value in this respect. Residual carbohydrate concentrations were not measured, so molar growth yields could not be calculated, and yields were measured after overnight growth, when each culture would have been in stationary phase for a number of hours and therefore subject to lysis before being analyzed. Nevertheless, peptides at 1 g/liter increased the apparent yield by between 22 and 57% in the species tested, with even greater stimulation arising from higher concentrations. Similar increases in growth yields of pure cultures of ruminal bacteria have been observed previously (17), and increased yields of up to almost 150% were found in mixed cultures with 0.1 g of Trypticase per liter added (3).
The manner in which ammonia incorporation was affected by preformed amino acids depended on the bacterial species and on whether the amino acids were supplied as peptides or as free amino acids. The availability of preformed amino acids suppressed de novo synthesis more in S. bovis than in the other species, a finding consistent with Cotta and Russell (17). P. bryantii showed a clear preference for the utilization of peptides over amino acids, while S. ruminantium and S. bovis used peptides and amino acids similarly. The preference for peptides of P. bryantii is consistent with the findings of Ling and Armstead (24), who observed that peptides were preferred for growth by P. ruminicola. However, the apparent lack of preference of the other species contrasts with the preference for free amino acids found by Ling and Armstead (24) and a report that amino acid transport was much more predominant than peptide transport in S. bovis (38).
Total cell N was always formed de novo to a greater extent than amino acids. Glutamate and aspartate were the most enriched amino acids in bacteria, consistent with glutamate dehydrogenase being the main route of ammonia assimilation in most ruminal bacteria (12, 20, 36). Transamination with oxaloacetate and pyruvate would account for subsequent enrichment of aspartate and alanine in S. ruminantium and S. bovis, and the enrichment of serine and to a lesser extent glycine in P. ruminicola indicates an active synthesis from 3-phosphoglycerate, involving transamination from glutamate. Why biosynthesis of proline should be switched off so much more readily than that of other amino acids is not clear. Proline can be formed from either glutamate or ornithine, and its synthesis is not linked to the synthesis of other amino acids (18). A similar phenomenon, the switching off of proline synthesis when preformed proline becomes available, occurs in the mixed ruminal population (34).
In conclusion, the present study illustrates that de novo synthesis of amino acids varies in accordance with the amino acid, the bacterial species, and the concentration of amino acids and peptides in the medium. The significance of proline biosynthesis as a possible limitation for rumen bacteria merits further investigation. Future work should also explore the influence of specific growth rate, nutrient concentrations, and the effects of other precursors on amino acid biosynthesis, in order to explain why the proportion of amino acids synthesized de novo is much lower in some in vivo and mixed culture studies than would be predicted from the present experiments.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank M. G. Annand, D. M. Brown, A. G. Calder, and E. Milne for their skilled analysis. This work was supported by the Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment and Fisheries Department.
REFERENCES
- 1.Allison M J, Bryant M P, Doetsch R N. Studies on the metabolic function of branched-chain volatile fatty acids, growth factors for ruminococci. I. Incorporation of isovalerate into leucine. J Bacteriol. 1962;83:523–532. doi: 10.1128/jb.83.3.523-532.1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Al-Rabbat M F, Baldwin R L, Weir W C. Microbial growth dependence on ammonia nitrogen in the bovine rumen: a quantitative study. J Dairy Sci. 1971;54:1162–1172. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Argyle J L, Baldwin R L. Effects of amino acids and peptides on rumen microbial growth yields. J Dairy Sci. 1989;72:2017–2027. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79325-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baldwin R L, Denham S C. Quantitative and dynamic aspects of nitrogen metabolism in the rumen: a modelling analysis. J Anim Sci. 1979;49:1631–1639. doi: 10.2527/jas1979.4961631x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barrie S, Workman C T. An automated analytical system for nutritional investigations using 15-N tracers. Spectrosc Int J. 1984;3:439–447. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ben-Ghedalia D, McMeniman N P, Amstrong D G. The effect of partially replacing urea nitrogen with protein N on N captive in the rumen of sheep fed a purified diet. Br J Nutr. 1978;39:37–44. doi: 10.1079/bjn19780009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Blackburn S. Amino acid determination, methods and techniques. New York, N.Y: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1968. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Broderick G A, Wallace R J. Effects of dietary nitrogen source on concentrations of ammonia, free amino acids and fluorescamine-reactive peptides in the sheep rumen. J Sci Food Agric. 1988;66:2233–2238. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bryant M P, Robinson I M. Studies on the nitrogen requirements of some ruminal cellulolytic bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1961;9:96–103. doi: 10.1128/am.9.2.96-103.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bryant M P, Robinson I M. Apparent incorporation of ammonia and amino acid carbon during growth of selected species of ruminal bacteria. J Dairy Sci. 1963;46:150–154. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bryant M P, Small N, Bouma C, Chu H. Bacteroides ruminicola n.sp and the new genus and species Succinomonas amylolytica. J Bacteriol. 1958;76:15–23. doi: 10.1128/jb.76.1.15-23.1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Burchall J J, Niederman R A, Wolin M J. Amino group formation and glutamate synthesis in Streptococcus bovis. J Bacteriol. 1964;88:1038–1044. doi: 10.1128/jb.88.4.1038-1044.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Calder A G, Smith A. Stable isotope ratio analysis of leucine and ketoisocaproic acid in blood plasma by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Use of tertiary butyldimethylsilyl derivatives. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1988;2:14–16. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1290020105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen G, Russell J B, Sniffen C J. A procedure for measuring peptides in rumen fluid and evidence that peptide uptake can be a rate-limiting step in ruminal protein degradation. J Dairy Sci. 1987;70:1211–1219. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80133-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen G, Sniffen C J, Russell J B. Concentration and estimated flow of peptides from the rumen of dairy cattle: effects of protein quantity, protein solubility and feeding frequency. J Dairy Sci. 1987;70:983–992. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80103-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Clark B, Holms W H. Control of the sequential utilisation of glucose and fructose by Escherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol. 1976;95:191–201. doi: 10.1099/00221287-95-2-191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cotta M A, Russell J B. Effect of peptides and amino acids on efficiency of rumen bacterial protein synthesis in continuous culture. J Dairy Sci. 1982;65:226–234. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dagley S, Nicholson D E. An introduction to metabolic pathways. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Davidson J, Mathieson J, Boyne A W. The use of automation in determining nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method, with final calculation by computer. Analyst. 1970;95:181–193. doi: 10.1039/an9709500181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hespell R B. Influence of ammonia assimilation pathways and survival strategy on ruminal microbial growth. In: Gilchrist F M C, Mackie R I, editors. Herbivore nutrition in the subtropics and tropics. Science Press (pty) Ltd. South Africa: Craighill; 1984. pp. 346–358. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hobson P N. Rumen bacteria. Methods Microbiol. 1969;3B:133–149. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hobson P N, McDougall E I, Summers R. The nitrogen sources of Bacteroides amylophilus. J Gen Microbiol. 1968;50:i. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Leng R A, Nolan J V. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. J Dairy Sci. 1984;67:1072–1089. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81409-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ling J R, Armstead I P. The in vitro uptake and metabolism of peptides and amino acids by five species of rumen bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol. 1995;78:116–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1995.tb02831.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Maeng W J, Baldwin R L. Factors influencing rumen microbial growth rates and yields: effect of amino acid additions to a purified diet with nitrogen from urea. J Dairy Sci. 1976;59:648–655. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(76)84254-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Maeng W J, Van Nevel C J, Baldwin R L, Morris J G. Rumen microbial growth rates and yields: effects of amino acids and proteins. J Dairy Sci. 1976;59:68–79. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(76)84157-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mathison G W, Milligan L P. Nitrogen metabolism in sheep. Br J Nutr. 1971;25:351–366. doi: 10.1079/bjn19710100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nieto R, Calder A G, Anderson S E, Lobley G E. Method for the determination of 15NH3 enrichment in biological samples by gas chromatography/electron impact mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom. 1996;31:289–294. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199603)31:3<289::AID-JMS299>3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nolan J V. Quantitative models of nitrogen metabolism in sheep. In: McDonald I W, Warner A C I, editors. Digestion and metabolism in the ruminant. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit; 1975. pp. 416–431. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nolan J V, Norton B W, Leng R A. Further studies on the dynamics of nitrogen metabolism in sheep. Br J Nutr. 1976;35:127–147. doi: 10.1079/bjn19760016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pilgrim A F, Gray F V, Weller R A, Belling G B. Synthesis of microbial protein from ammonia in the sheep’s rumen and the proportion of dietary nitrogen converted into microbial N. Br J Nutr. 1970;24:589–598. doi: 10.1079/bjn19700057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Russell J B, O’Connor J D, Fox D G, Van Soest P J, Sniffen C J. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets. 1. Ruminal fermentation. J Anim Sci. 1992;70:3551–3561. doi: 10.2527/1992.70113551x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Russell J B, Sniffen C J, Van Soest P J. Effect of carbohydrate limitation on degradation and utilisation of casein by mixed rumen bacteria. J Dairy Sci. 1983;66:763–775. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)81856-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Salter D N, Daneshvar K, Smith R H. The origin of nitrogen incorporated into compounds in the rumen bacteria of steers given protein- and urea-containing diets. Br J Nutr. 1979;41:197–209. doi: 10.1079/bjn19790026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Scott H W, Dehority B A. Vitamin requirements of several cellulolytic rumen bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1965;89:1169–1175. doi: 10.1128/jb.89.5.1169-1175.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Smith C J, Hespell R B, Bryant M P. Ammonia assimilation and glutamate formation in the anaerobe Selenomonas ruminantium. J Bacteriol. 1980;141:593–602. doi: 10.1128/jb.141.2.593-602.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wallace R J, McKain N. A comparison of methods for determining the concentration of extracellular peptides in rumen fluid of sheep. J Agric Sci. 1990;114:101–105. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Westlake K, Mackie R I. Peptide and amino acid transport in Streptococcus bovis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1990;34:97–102. doi: 10.1007/BF00170931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Whitehead R, Cooke G H, Chapman B T. Problems associated with the continuous monitoring of ammoniacal nitrogen in river water. Automat Anal Chem. 1967;2:377–380. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Williams A P, Cockburn J E. Effect of slowly and rapidly degraded protein sources on the concentration of amino acids and peptides in the rumen of steers. J Sci Food Agric. 1991;56:303–314. [Google Scholar]