Skip to main content
Open Forum Infectious Diseases logoLink to Open Forum Infectious Diseases
. 2023 Nov 27;10(Suppl 2):ofad500.1671. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1671

1843. Exploring Cisgender Women's HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Needs and Preferences Across Settings: the Roles of Social-Structural Factors

Deanna Kerrigan 1, Kimi Yonamine 2, Allison O’Rourke 3, Tahilin Sanchez Karver 4, Wendy W Davis 5, Aimee A Metzner 6, Alan Oglesby 7, Cindy Garris 8, Rachel Scott 9, Patricia Moriarty 10, Tamara Taggart 11, Clare Barrington 12, Hoisex Gomez 13, Martha Perez 14, Yeycy Donastorg 15,1,2
PMCID: PMC10678848

Abstract

Background

Cisgender women (CGW) account for 48% of new HIV infections globally and 18% of new HIV infections in the United States (US) but comprise only 8% of daily oral PrEP users in the US. Social-structural factors including stigma, gender norms, and medical provider bias have been linked to daily oral PrEP inequities among CGW. These factors influencing PrEP utilization merit further attention as additional options emerge, including long-acting (LA) injectable PrEP.

Methods

PrEP preferences, barriers, and facilitators to uptake were explored through 60 in-depth interviews with CGW with indications for PrEP (n=40), and HIV and reproductive healthcare providers (HCPs) (n=20) in Washington, DC, US and Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (DR) in 2021 and 2022 (Table 1). CGW in the DR were female sex workers (FSW), while those in DC were seeking reproductive health services. Thematic content analysis was employed.

graphic file with name ofad500_1843_f1.jpg

Results

Participants noted low awareness of PrEP, particularly LA PrEP, among CGW across settings and indicated this may be in part due to ongoing emphasis on PrEP for men who have sex with men and transgender women compared to CGW. In DC and the DR, PrEP was often seen as a potential empowerment tool by CGW to address social-structural constraints, gender-related pressures and responsibilities, and inequitable partner dynamics. The perceived need for and preferences regarding daily oral vs. LA injectable PrEP was mixed among CGW in DC due to varied self-assessment regarding PrEP as a priority and some CGW’s comfort with pill taking. LA PrEP was described by some CGW as a means to improve adherence and reduce stigma associated with pill taking. FSW in the DR were particularly interested in LA PrEP as they found it more compatible with their work. Suggested facilitators of PrEP uptake noted across settings included financial and logistical support (transport, childcare) and HCP training on CGW’s PrEP needs.

Conclusion

Tailored CGW-centered awareness campaigns and sensitivity training for HCPs related to PrEP options for CGW are needed. Access to LA PrEP for FSW is critical given the disproportionate impact of HIV on this community and their work-related PrEP preferences. Interventions must address social-structural factors among CGW to support equitable PrEP uptake.

Disclosures

Aimee A. Metzner, PharmD, AAHIVP, ViiV Healthcare: Full-time employee (salary/benefits/etc.)|ViiV Healthcare: Stocks/Bonds Alan Oglesby, MPH, GlaxoSmithKline: Employment|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Cindy Garris, MS, GSK: Stocks/Bonds|ViiV Healthcare: Employee Rachel Scott, MD,MPH,FACOG, Gilead Science: Grant/Research Support|ViiV/GSK: Grant/Research Support


Articles from Open Forum Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES