Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct;120:102478. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102478

Table 3.

Association of the information and ethnicity treatments with willingness to contribute labor hours.

Full sample
Groups matched to same-ethnicity agents
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Information treatment −1.37 −0.94 −0.88 −0.45 −0.29 −0.25
(1.23) (1.25) (1.18) (0.85) (0.77) (0.74)
Low ethnicity agent −4.50 −3.88 −3.60
(1.16)*** (1.31)*** (1.25)***
Information treatment*Low ethnicity agent 1.70 1.08 0.79
(1.37) (1.49) (1.43)
R2 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.00 0.10 0.14
N 2,223 2,223 2,223 1,465 1,465 1,465
Mean of Control 11.76 11.76 11.76 9.62 9.62 9.62
Controls Restricted Full Restricted Full

For columns 1–3 the relevant control group is those SHGs that did not receive information and were matched to a high-ethnicity agent. For columns 4–6 it is those SHGs that were matched to same ethnicity agents and did not receive information. Restricted controls include respondent age, marital status (1/0), ethnicity (=ST), religion (=Hindu), employment status (1/0), education, HH size, number of children under the age of 5 years, wealth quintiles, total land cultivated, number of years they have been an SHG member and the number of SHG members present at the experiment. Full controls additionally include #food groups consumed, have kitchen garden (1/0), grow vegetables on their land (1/0), agree that produce should be split equally (1/0), dummies for group cohesion and for agent ability. Standard errors (in parentheses) clustered at the SHG level. * p < 0.1 ** p < 0.05; *** p < 0.01.