for the main comparison.
Culturally appropriate health education for type 2 diabetes mellitus in ethnic minority groups | ||||||
Population: ethnic minority groups with type 2 diabetes mellitus Settings: primary healthcare centres or hospital clinics Intervention: culturally appropriate health education (education tailored to the cultural or religious beliefs and linguistic skills of the community being approached, taking into account likely literacy skills) Comparison: conventional diabetes education | ||||||
Outcomes | Culturally appropriate health education | Conventional diabetes education | Relative effect (95% CI) | No. of participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments |
Complications of diabetes mellitus | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | See comment | See comment | 2 studies provided limited data on complications (microalbuminuria, new cardiovascular events) |
Health‐related quality of life Follow‐up: 3, 6 and 12 months |
See comment | See comment | Not estimable | 224 (3) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ lowa |
Neutral effects on health‐related quality of life; only 3/7 studies reporting this outcome contained data that could be incorporated into meta‐analysis |
All‐cause and specific mortality | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | See comment | See comment | Not investigated |
Adverse events | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | See comment | See comment | There was a general lack of reporting of adverse events in most studies |
(a) Self‐efficacy and empowerment
Follow‐up: 3, 6 and 12 months (b) Participant satisfaction |
(a) See comment (b) See comment |
(a) See comment (b) See comment |
(a) See comment (b) Not estimable |
(a) 720 (6) at 3 months, 422 (4) at 6 months, 497 (2) at 12 months (b) See comment |
(a) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa (b) See comment |
(a) Statistically significant difference at 6 months (SMD 0.49 (0.18 to 0.80)), but not at 3 and 12 months (b) Two studies had undertaken some form of participant satisfaction assessment but did not provide participant satisfaction scores |
HbA1c [%] Follow‐up: 6 and 12 months |
Mean HbA1c ranged across control groups from 7.8% to 12.2% at 6 months and 7.6% to 11.6% at 12 months | Mean HbA1c in the intervention groups was0.5% lower (0.7% to 0.4% lower) at 6 months and 0.2% lower (0.3% to 0.04% lower) at 12 months | ‐ | 1972 (14) at 6 months 1966 (9) at 12 months |
⊕⊕⊕⊕ high | ‐ |
Health economics: cost‐effectiveness [QALY] Follow‐up: 6 months |
Intervention vs control resulted in £28,933 per QALY gained | 417 (1) |
⊕⊕⊝⊝ lowb | Five studies provided rough estimates of costs ranging from $250 per participant over 6 weeks to $701 per participant over 2 years | ||
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval; QALY: quality‐adjusted life years; RR: risk ratio; SMD: standardised mean difference. | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence. High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate. |
aDowngraded by two levels because of inconsistency and risk of performance and detection bias. bDowngraded by two levels because of one study with only a few participants and short follow‐up, as well as risk of performance bias.