Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 4;2014(9):CD006424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006424.pub3

1. Overview of study populations.

Characteristic Intervention(s) and comparator(s) Sample sizea Screened/eligible
 [N] Randomised
 [N] Safety
 [N] Finishing study
 [N] Randomised finishing study
 [%] Follow‐upb
(1) Agurs Collins 1997 I: individual and group sessions 40 87 32   30 93.8 6 mo
C: 1 class and info leaflet 40 32   25 78.1
total: 64   55 90.6
85.9
 
(2) Anderson 2005 I: group sessions 125   3 mo
C: usual care plus feedback on baseline bloods 114  
total: 239   194 81.2  
(3) Babamoto 2009 I1: individual sessions plus telephone calls 1352/354 106   60 56.6 6 mo
I2: case management 106      
C: usual care 106   54 50.9
total: 318   189 59.4  
(4) Baradaran 2006
 
I1: group sessions 299 59   44 74.6 6 mo
C1: usual care—South Asian 59   36 61.0
C2: usual care—White Caucasian 27c   21 77.8
total: 118   101 85.6  
(5) Bellary 2008 I: treatment protocols and extra clinics
 plus link workers 16‐18 clusters of 80‐100 participants 3571/2426 868   747 86.1 24 mo
C: treatment protocols only 618   531 85.9
total: 1486   1278 86.0  
(6) Brown 2002 I: group sessions 126   89 70.6 12 mo
C: usual care—wait‐listed control group 126   89 70.6
total: 252   178 70.6  
(7) Carter 2011 I: Internet and videoconferencing with nurse   26 9 mo
C: usual care   21
total: 74   47 63.5  
(8) Crowley 2013 I: individual sessions via telephone 200 2153/1508 182   166 91.2 12 mo
C: usual care + leaflet 177   164 92.7
total: 359   329 91.6  
(9) D'Eramo Melkus 2010
 
I: group sessions 129 236/119 57   40 70.2 24 mo
C: conventional (not culturally appropriate) group sessions 52   37 71.2
total: 109   77 70.6  
(10) DePue 2013 I: Nurse‐led self‐management education and medication management facilitation
 components 362 406/312 104   95 91.3 12 mo
C: usual care 164   148 90.2
total: 268   243 90.7  
(11) Gary 2009
 
 
I: individual visits to CHW and nurse following
 culturally appropriate clinical algorithms 2450/955 269   235 87.4 24 mo
C: telephone calls and information leaflets 273   253 92.7
total: 542   488 90.0  
(12) Gucciardi 2007
 
 
I1: group sessions 233 41   25 61.0 3 mo
I2: individual sessions 46   36 78.3
total: 87   61 70.1  
(13) Hawthorne 1998
 
 
I: individual session with CHW—flashcards 100 ‐/201 112   106 94.6 6 mo
C: usual care in clinics 100 89   86 96.6
total: 201   192 95.5  
(14) Kattelmann 2009
 
 
I: group sessions 57 57   51 89.5 6 mo
C: standard dietary education and health care 57 57   53 92.9
total: 114   104 91.2  
(15) Keyserling 2002
 
 
 
I1: individual and group sessions 210 219 66   54 81.8 12 mo
I2: individual—not included in meta‐analysis 67   59 88.1
C: usual care 67   58 86.6
total: 200   171 85.5  
(16) Khan 2011
 
 
I: individual computer‐based 146/129 67   53 79.1 3 mo
C: brochure with crossword puzzle 62   47 75.8
total: 129   100 77.5  
(17) Kim 2009
 
 
I: group sessions and telephone calls 40 224/83 41   40 97.6 30 wk
C: usual care (wait‐listed) 40 42   39 95.1
total: 83   79 95.2  
(18) Lorig 2008
 
 
I: group sessions 219   179 81.7 6 mo
C: usual care (wait‐listed) 198   173 87.4
total: 417   352 84.4  
(19) Lujan 2007
 
 
I1: group sessions, telephone calls and
 inspirational postcards 75 ‐/160 75   70 93.3 6 mo
C1: usual care—individual sessions and info leaflets 75 75   71 94.7
total: 150   143 95.3  
(20) Middelkoop 2001
 
 
I: group sessions 53   53 100 6 mo
C: usual care (wait‐listed) 60   60 100
total: 113   113 100  
(21) O'Hare 2004
 
 
I: treatment protocols plus extra diabetes clinics
 and link workers 64 401 180   165 91.7 12 mo
C: treatment protocols only 64 181   160 88.4
total: 361   325 90.0  
(22) Osborn 2010
 
 
I: individual education session ‐/129 59   48 81.4 3 mo
C: usual care—access to monthly support group
 facilitated by Puerto‐Rican worker 59   43 72.9
total: 118   91 77.1  
(23) Philis‐Tsimikas 2011 I: group education sessions and support group 210 ‐/961 104   56 53.8 10 mo
C: usual care 103   72 69.9
total: 207   156 75.4  
(24) Rosal 2005
 
 
I: individual and group sessions 54 15   6 mo
C: usual care plus feedback of test results 10  
total: 25   92  
(25) Rosal 2011
 
 
I: individual and group sessions 250 592/276 124   106 85.5 12 mo
C: usual care 128   105 82.0
total: 252   211 83.7  
(26) Rothschild 2012 I: home visits 343/‐ 73   58 79.5 ???
C: mailed information leaflets 71   61 85.9
total: 144   119 82.6  
(27) Samuel‐Hodge 2009
 
 
I: individual, group and telephone calls 280 284/260 117   101 86.3 12 mo
C: minimal intervention: leaflets and newsletters 84   69 82.1
total: 201   170 84.6  
(28) Sixta 2008
 
 
I: group sessions 734/135 63       6 mo
C: usual care (wait‐listed) 68      
total: 131   60 45.8  
(29) Skelly 2005
 
 
I: home visits 20 52   23 12 wk
12 wk
C: usual care plus telephone call (wait‐listed) 20   18
total: 47   41 87.2  
(30) Skelly 2009
 
 
I1: home visits—symptom focused 308/180 60   60 100 9 mo
I2: home visits with booster (not used in the meta‐analysis) 60   55 91.7
C1: nurse home visits—non‐symptom focused 60   59 98.3
total: 180   174 96.7  
(31) Spencer 2011 I: group meetings, home visit and accompanied clinic visit 1719/183 84   59 70.2 6 mo
C: usual care (wait listed) 99   77 77.8
total: 164   136 82.9  
(32) Toobert 2011
 
 
I: group meetings 4045/680 142     24 mo
C: usual care 138    
total: 280   61.4  
(33) Vincent 2007
 
 
I: group sessions 60/30 10   9 90 3 mo
C: usual care 10   8 80
total: 20   17 85  
Grand total All interventions   N/A  
All comparators
All interventions and comparators 7453

aAccording to power calculation in study publication or report.
 bDuration of intervention and/or follow‐up under randomised conditions until end of study.
 cNot used in the meta‐analysis.

"‐" denotes not reported.

C: comparator; CHW: community health worker; I: intervention; ITT: intention‐to‐treat; mo: month; N/A: not applicable; wk: weeks