Abstract
The coupling of carboxylic acids and amines to form amide linkages is the most commonly performed reaction in the pharmaceutical industry. Herein, we report a new strategy that merges these traditional amide coupling partners to generate sulfonamides, important amide bioisosteres. This method leverages copper ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) to convert aromatic acids to sulfonyl chlorides, followed by one-pot amination to form the corresponding sulfonamide. This process requires no prefunctionalization of the native acid or amine and extends to a diverse set of aryl, heteroaryl, and s-rich aliphatic substrates. Further, we extend this strategy to the synthesis of (hetero)aryl sulfonyl fluorides, which have found utility as “click” handles in chemical probes and programmable bifunctional reagents. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of these protocols in pharmaceutical analogue synthesis.
Carboxylic acids and amines have high structural diversity, synthetic utility, and broad availability from both natural and commercial sources.1,2 These two functionalities are the traditional partners of the amide coupling, the most commonly performed reaction by medicinal chemists.3,4 Amides, however, can be metabolically labile toward hydrolysis and may not possess the ideal binding properties for a given target.5 To address these shortcomings, several amide bioisosteres have been identified that retain similar geometric properties to amides while displaying modified metabolic stability or binding affinity.6
One notable amide isostere is the sulfonamide, which features similar geometry, an additional hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA), improved hydrolytic stability, and increased polar surface area (PSA).7 These features can lead to dramatic improvements in physiochemical properties or binding affinity, with examples showing nearly 200-fold increases in binding with no other structural modification.8 Beyond medicinal chemistry, sulfonamides have been used in place of amides to tune the gelation properties of physical gels.9 Despite high interest, the preparation of sulfonamide analogues typically necessitates de novo synthesis of a sulfonyl chloride partner or a multistep sequence proceeding through high-energy diazonium intermediates.8,10 Therefore, a method for the expedient synthesis of sulfonamides from the same partners used in conventional amide coupling would accelerate the preparation of amide analogues in drug discovery campaigns.
We envisioned the synthesis of sulfonamides from aryl carboxylic acids and amines could be achieved through an initial decarboxylative chlorosulfonylation, followed by a one-pot sulfonamide formation via the addition of an amine (Figure 1). This strategy confers several benefits. First, the reaction between amines and sulfonyl chlorides occurs rapidly and is robust in scope.11 Second, sulfonyl chlorides themselves are valuable synthetic intermediates and can be used as a lynchpin functionality toward the synthesis of diverse sulfur containing functionalities, such as sulfonates,12 sulfones,13 sulfinates,14 and thiophenols.15 Moreover, we anticipated that a decarboxylative halosulfonylation strategy would extend to aryl sulfonyl fluorides, valuable “click” handles for sulfur(VI)−fluoride exchange16,17 with broad utility as chemical probes,18 programmable bifunctional reagents,19 and versatile functional handles.20 While several methodologies have been developed in recent years for accessing aryl sulfonyl halides from aryl boronic esters,21 halides,22 diazoniums,23 and several sulfur-containing functionalities,24 a direct approach beginning from aryl carboxylic acids has not been reported to date.17
Figure 1.

Decarboxylative halosulfonylation and subsequent amination of (hetero)aryl acids via Cu-LMCT catalysis.
Despite its appeal, the development of a versatile decarboxylative halosulfonylation protocol presents several challenges. While the decarboxylative halosulfonylation of related aliphatic systems has been reported,25 aromatic decarboxylation is significantly more challenging.1 Recently, both Ritter and our group have demonstrated that copper ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) is a mild and general approach for traditionally challenging aromatic decarboxylative functionalizations including halogenation,26,27 borylation,28 hydroxylation,29 and sulfoximination.30,31 Notably, our lab rendered this strategy catalytic in copper by including a single electron oxidant.27,28 Given the broad precedent for engaging aryl radicals with SO2 to forge C−S bonds,32 we anticipated that a Cu-LMCT strategy could be successful for catalytic decarboxylative halosulfonylation. Additionally, we expected that the mild nature of LMCT decarboxylation could allow a highly efficient one-pot conversion of sulfonyl chlorides to sulfonamides, circumventing the isolation of highly reactive electrophiles. Herein, we describe the successful development of a copper-catalyzed aromatic decarboxylative halosulfonylation, expediently accessing sulfonamides from aryl carboxylic acids and amines.
We propose the general design plan for decarboxylative halosulfonylation, as detailed in Figure 2. First, a Cu(II) catalyst combines with an in situ generated aryl carboxylate, providing a photoactive Cu(II) carboxylate. Upon irradiation, this complex can undergo LMCT, inducing Cu−O bond homolysis and furnishing an aroyloxy radical as well as a reduced Cu(I) species. We hypothesize these two species can recombine, regenerating the ground state Cu(II) carboxylate complex and suppressing competitive, deleterious bimolecular reaction pathways.33 The aroyloxy radical can also undergo decarboxylation, furnishing the desired aryl radical. Radical capture by SO2 would then forge the desired C(sp2)−S bond and generate an aryl sulfonyl radical.32 We propose that this sulfur-centered radical could react with various electrophilic halogenation reagents to afford the desired aryl sulfonyl halide products. Finally, a suitable single electron oxidant can oxidize Cu(I) to Cu(II), closing the catalytic cycle.
Figure 2.

General design plan for the decarboxylative halosulfonylation of (hetero)aryl acids.
We began optimization studies by attempting the decarboxylative chlorosulfonylation of 4-fluorobenzoic acid. By employing Cu(MeCN)4BF4 as the most generally successful copper catalyst, 1-fluoro-2,4,6-trimethylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate (NFTPT) as the single electron oxidant, 1,3-dichloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin (DCDMH) as a chlorine atom source, and the integrated photoreactor (IPR) as a high intensity source of 365 nm light,34 we observed a 2% yield of the desired sulfonyl chloride product with sodium metabisulfite as the SO2 source (Table 1, entry 8). While other SO2 surrogates from the literature were similarly unsuccessful,35 super stoichiometric loadings of copper did lead to improved yield in some cases (see SI for experimental details). Recognizing the sensitivity of Cu-LMCT decarboxylation to the Lewis basic functionality present in each of these surrogates, we sought to employ SO2 directly by evaluating stock solutions of SO2. We were delighted to find that by using a solution of SO2 in acetonitrile,22c,35a,36 we observed formation of the desired product in 62% yield (Table 1, entry 2). Though we prepared our solution in house, similar stock solutions of SO2 in acetonitrile are commercially available. This solution could be stored over extended periods of time in a sealed vessel at −20 °C. Despite frequent use, no decrease in reaction performance was observed when using a single 4.0 M stock solution for >6 months. Control reactions are consistent with the proposed LMCT pathway, as copper, oxidant, and light are all essential for reactivity (Table 1, entries 3−5).
Table 1.
Control Experiments and Optimization for LMCT Decarboxylative Chlorosulfonylation and One-Pot Sulfonamide Formation
| ||
| entrya | deviations | yieldb |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | none | 69% |
| 2 | no LiBF4 | 62% |
| 3 | ambient light only | 0% |
| 4 | no Cu | 0% |
| 5 | no NFTPT | 0% |
| 6 | no DCDMH | 0% |
| 7 | no SO2 | 0% |
| 8 | with Na2S2O5 (2 equiv) instead of SO2 | 2% |
| 9 | with DABSO (1 equiv) instead of SO2 | 0% |
| 10 | entry 2 then morpholine (2 equiv) and DIPEA (2 equiv) | 50%c |
| 11 | entry 1 then morpholine (2 equiv) and DIPEA (2 equiv) | 68%c |
0.1 mmol scale.
Yields determined by 19F NMR analysis.
Yield of the corresponding morpholine sulfonamide. See SI for experimental details. NFTPT, 1-fluoro-2,4,6-trimethylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate. DCDMH, 1,3-dichloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin.
We next attempted to convert the sulfonyl chlorides to sulfonamides in the same reaction vessel. We found that this functionalization could be achieved in near quantitative yield from the intermediate sulfonyl chloride by adding morpholine and DIPEA to the crude reaction mixture following irradiation and removal of unreacted SO2.37 Across both steps, we found that LiBF4 was a beneficial additive for avoiding the formation of an undesired sulfonyl fluoride byproduct, ultimately delivering the desired morpholine sulfonamide in 68% yield (Table 1, entry 11).
Excitingly, this strategy was extended to efficient decarboxylative fluorosulfonylation using Selectfluor as both the single electron oxidant and fluorine atom source, slightly elevated copper loadings of 50 mol %, and an increased concentration of 0.5 M (see SI for experimental details).
With the optimized conditions in hand, we evaluated the scope of the decarboxylative chlorosulfonylation reaction (Figure 3). To demonstrate that electronically and sterically unbiased substrates are capable of this reaction, benzoic acid was converted to benzenesulfonamide (1, 63% yield). Gratifyingly, electron deficient acids (2−7, 61−85% yield) proceeded with good to excellent efficiencies. Notably, these examples were successfully functionalized with diverse amines, providing efficient access to primary, secondary, tertiary, and anilinic sulfonamides, all in near quantitative yield from the intermediate sulfonyl chlorides. Ortho-substitution was also found to be well tolerated (8 and 9, 58 and 75% yield, respectively). Additionally, O−heteroatom substituents could be effectively introduced around the arene periphery (10 and 11, 71 and 61% yield, respectively), as well as electron donating alkyl substituents (12 and 13, 59 and 61% yield, respectively). Finally, other sulfur-containing functionalities such as trifluoromethyl thioethers (14, 75% yield) and sulfonyl fluorides (15, 69% yield) were successfully tolerated, high-lighting an opportunity to introduce distinct sulfur-containing functionalities of variable oxidation states on the same arene.
Figure 3.

Decarboxylative chlorosulfonylation and one-pot sulfonamide formation. Reactions were performed on a 0.5 mmol scale with (hetero)aryl acid (1 equiv), [Cu(MeCN)4]BF4 (20 mol %), 1,3-dichloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin (1 equiv), 1-fluoro-2,4,6-trimethylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate (1 equiv), LiBF4 (1.2 equiv), SO2 (2 equiv), MeCN (0.1 M), 365 nm LEDs, 12 h. Amination conducted in MeCN or THF (0.1 M) with amine or amine·HCl (2 equiv) and DIPEA or pyridine (2−4 equiv). See SI for experimental details. All yields isolated. aAmination performed with 25 equiv of NH4OH. bWith N-chlorosuccinimide (2.5 equiv) as the chlorination reagent. cWith N-chlorophthalimide (2 equiv) as chlorination reagent. dWith 10 mol % [Cu(MeCN)4]BF4.
We were eager to evaluate the scope of heteroaryl sulfonyl chlorides accessible via this sequence, as these scaffolds are desirable in medicinal chemistry programs despite the challenges presented by their high electrophilicity and susceptibility to hydrolysis. We were delighted to find that our method proceeded in good efficiency on a range of differentially substituted, electron-deficient pyridines, including picolinic (16−18, 45−64% yield), nicotinic (19−22, 45−55% yield) and isonicotinic (23, 63% yield) acids across a diverse set of amines.
We next attempted to extend our method beyond (hetero)arenes and toward the functionalization of other medicinally relevant s-rich acids, such as cyclopropanes and bicyclo[1.1.1]pentanes (BCPs), which have found widespread adoption as arene bioisosteres.38 An inexpensive and commercially available BCP substrate, 3-(methoxycarbonyl)-BCP-1-carboxylic acid, was efficiently converted to the corresponding sulfonamide (24, 63% yield). While BCPs bearing a sulfonamide exit vector have been reported in the literature, they previously have been accessed via a 5-step synthetic sequence.39 Beyond this BCP scaffold, cyclopropanes were also readily functionalized in high yield (25, 64% yield, see SI for additional examples and limitations).
While each of the acid starting materials that appear in Figure 3 are inexpensive and commercially available,40 the corresponding sulfonyl chlorides are in many cases either not commercial (designated by NC) or are prohibitively expensive (>$100 per gram and >18× more expensive per gram than the acid starting material, designated by PE).41 As such, this procedure to convert bench-stable acids to desirable sulfonamides via a one-pot protocol alleviates a significant limitation associated with sulfonamide preparation.
Next, we evaluated the scope of the decarboxylative fluorosulfonylation (Figure 4). This reaction tolerates both electron-deficient (26−28, 50−82% yield) and electron-rich (29 and 30, 50 and 53% yield, respectively) acids. Additionally, highly activated aryl bromides (31, 56% yield) are well tolerated. This method also extends to a similarly desirable selection of electron deficient isonicotinic (32−34, 51−61%) and nicotinic acids (35, 59% yield). While picolinic acids did not proceed in the standard protocol with high efficiencies, a one-pot, two step procedure for their synthesis from the intermediate sulfonyl chloride was developed (36, 53% yield). Though more challenging, other heteroarenes, such as pyridazines (37, 40%), were also successful.
Figure 4.

Decarboxylative fluorosulfonylation of (hetero)aryl carboxylic acids. Reactions were performed on a 0.5 mmol scale with (hetero)aryl acid (1 equiv), [Cu(MeCN)4]BF4 (50 mol %), Selectfluor (1.5 equiv), SO2 (2 equiv), and MeCN (0.5 M), 365 nm LEDs, 12 h. All yields isolated. aIsolated as the SNAr product with N-Boc piperazine. bVia halogen exchange from the corresponding sulfonyl chloride. See SI for experimental details.
To demonstrate the differentiated reactivity of sulfonyl chlorides and fluorides, we subjected 2-chloro-6-(trifluoromethyl)nicotinic acid to both sets of halosulfonylation conditions, followed by an identical one-pot amination. These two sequences gave different products: the sulfonyl chloride was converted exclusively to the expected sulfonamide product (38, 65% yield) while the sulfonyl fluoride gave exclusively the SNAr product (39, 71% yield). This selectivity is due to the attenuated electrophilicity of sulfonyl fluorides and can allow for programmable SNAr/sulfonamide formation sequences.
To exemplify the utility of these methods in drug discovery programs, we undertook the synthesis of sulfonamide analogues for amide-containing biologically active molecules (Figure 5). Sulfonamide analogues of (±)-Bitopertin and Vismodegib could be synthesized in high yields directly from their amide coupling partners (40 and 41, 53 and 72% yield, respectively). Additionally, native carboxylate pharmacophores could be directly converted into sulfonyl fluoride-containing chemical probes potentially capable of forming covalent linkages in the binding sites of their target proteins.18 Specifically, Ataluren and Lumacaftor were converted into their sulfonyl fluoride analogues in good yield (42 and 43, 62 and 41% yield, respectively). Finally, the tolyl group of Celebrex was converted to an aryl sulfonyl fluoride in a two-step sequence involving benzylic oxidation and subsequent decarboxylative fluorosulfonylation (44, 54% yield).
Figure 5.

Late stage functionalization via Cu-LMCT halosulfonylation. All yields isolated. See SI for experimental details. aAfter two-step benzylic oxidation and decarboxylative fluorosulfonylation. Yield given is for the fluorosulfonylation step.
In summary, we have developed an approach for aromatic decarboxylative halosulfonylation that is amenable to a one-pot synthesis of sulfonamides from traditional amide coupling partners. We anticipate that these reactions will be of value to the medicinal chemistry community by assisting in the rapid synthesis of diverse organosulfur products.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are grateful for financial support provided by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), the NIH (under Award R35GM134897-03), the Princeton Catalysis Initiative, and kind gifts from Pfizer, MSD, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Genentech. P. S. P. acknowledges Princeton University, E. C. Taylor and the Taylor family for an Edward C. Taylor Fellowship and the National Science Foundation (NSF) for a predoctoral fellowship (Award DGE-2039656). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIGMS. The authors thank R. Lambert for assistance in preparing this manuscript and T. Chen, P. Sarver, and C. Oswood for helpful scientific discussions.
Footnotes
The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): D.W.C.M. declares a competing financial interest with respect to the Integrated Photoreactor.
Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/jacs.3c08218
Contributor Information
P. Scott Pedersen, Merck Center for Catalysis, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States.
David C. Blakemore, Worldwide Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc., Groton, Connecticut 06340, United States
Gary M. Chinigo, Worldwide Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc., Groton, Connecticut 06340, United States
Thomas Knauber, Worldwide Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc., Groton, Connecticut 06340, United States.
David W. C. MacMillan, Merck Center for Catalysis, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States
REFERENCES
- (1).(a) Varenikov A; Shapiro E; Gandelman M Decarboxylative Halogenation of Organic Compounds. Chem. Rev 2021, 121 (1), 412–484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Beil SB; Chen TQ; Intermaggio NE; MacMillan DWC Carboxylic Acids as Adaptive Functional Groups in Metallaphotoredox Catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res 2022, 55 (23), 3481–3494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Wang Y; Haight I; Gupta R; Vasudevan A What Is in Our Kit? An Analysis of Building Blocks Used in Medicinal Chemistry Parallel Libraries. J. Med. Chem 2021, 64 (23), 17115–17122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Boström J; Brown DG; Young RJ; Keserü GM Expanding the Medicinal Chemistry Synthetic Toolbox. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2018, 17 (10), 709–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).For examples of alternative couplings of carboxylic acids and amines, see:; (a) Zhang Z; Cernak T The Formal Cross-Coupling of Amines and Carboxylic Acids to Form sp3−sp3 Carbon−Carbon Bonds. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2021, 60 (52), 27293–27298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) McGrath A; Zhang R; Shafiq K; Cernak T Repurposing amine and carboxylic acid building blocks with an automatable esterification reaction. Chem. Commun 2023, 59, 1026–1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wang J; Ehehalt LE; Huang Z; Beleh OM; Guzei IA; Weix DJ Formation of C(sp2)−C(sp3) Bonds Instead of Amide C−N Bonds from Carboxylic Acid and Amine Substrate Pools by Decarbonylative Cross-Electrophile Coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2023, 145 (18), 9951–9958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Douthwaite JL; Zhao R; Shim E; Mahjour B; Zimmerman PM; Cernak T Formal Cross-Coupling of Amines and Carboxylic Acids to Form sp3−sp2 Carbon−Carbon Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2023, 145 (20), 10930–10937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Mahjour B; Shen Y; Liu W; Cernak T A map of the amine–carboxylic acid coupling system. Nature. 2020, 580, 71–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Kumari S; Carmona AV; Tiwari AK; Trippier PC Amide Bond Bioisosteres: Strategies, Synthesis, and Successes. J. Med. Chem 2020, 63 (21), 12290–12358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Ecker AK; Levorse DA; Victor DA; Mitcheltree MJ Bioisostere Effects on the EPSA of Common Permeability-Limiting Groups. ACS Med. Chem. Lett 2022, 13, 964–971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Hirayama F; Koshio H; Ishihara T; Watanuki S; Hachiya S; Kaizawa H; Kuramochi T; Katayama N; Kurihara H; Taniuchi Y; Sato K; Sakai-Moritani Y; Kaku S; Kawasaki T; Matsumoto Y; Sakamoto S; Tsukamoto S Design, Synthesis and Biological Activity of YM-60828 Derivatives: Potent and Orally-Bioavailable Factor Xa Inhibitors Based on Naphthoanilide and Naphthalensulfonanilide Templates. Bioorg. Med. Chem 2002, 10 (8), 2597–2610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Alegre-Requena JV; Grijalvo S; Sampedro D; Mayr J; Saldías C; Marrero-Tellado JJ; Eritja R; Herrera RP; Díaz DD Sulfonamide as amide isostere for fine-tuning the gelation properties of physical gels. RSC Adv. 2020, 10 (19), 11481–11492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Mondal S; Malakar S Synthesis of Sulfonamide and Their Synthetic and Therapeutic Applications: Recent Advances. Tetrahedron 2020, 76 (48), 131662. [Google Scholar]
- (11).Roughley SD; Jordan AM The Medicinal Chemist’s Toolbox: An Analysis of Reactions Used in the Pursuit of Drug Candidates. J. Med. Chem 2011, 54 (10), 3451–3479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Mondal S Recent Developments in the Synthesis and Application of Sultones. Chem. Rev 2012, 112 (10), 5339–5355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Hell SM; Meyer CF; Misale A; Sap JB; Christensen KE; Willis MC; Trabanco AA; Gouverneur V Hydrosulfonylation of Alkenes with Sulfonyl Chlorides under Visible Light Activation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2020, 132 (28), 11717–11723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).(a) Whitmore FC; Hamilton FH SODIUM p-TOLUENESULFINATE. Org. Synth 1922, 2, 89–90. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kulka M Derivatives of p-Chlorobenzenesulfonic Acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1950, 72, 1215–1218. [Google Scholar]
- (15).Akamanchi K; Bellale E; Chaudhari M A Simple, Fast and Chemoselective Method for the Preparation of Arylthiols. Synthesis 2009, 2009, 3211–3213. [Google Scholar]
- (16).Dong J; Krasnova L; Finn MG; Sharpless KB Sulfur(VI) Fluoride Exchange (SuFEx): Another Good Reaction for Click Chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2014, 53 (36), 9430–9448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Lou TS-B; Willis MC Sulfonyl Fluorides as Targets and Substrates in the Development of New Synthetic Methods. Nat. Rev. Chem 2022, 6 (2), 146–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).(a) Grimster NP; Connelly S; Baranczak A; Dong J; Krasnova LB; Sharpless KB; Powers ET; Wilson IA; Kelly JW Aromatic Sulfonyl Fluorides Covalently Kinetically Stabilize Transthyretin to Prevent Amyloidogenesis While Affording a Fluorescent Conjugate. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135 (15), 5656–5668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Mukherjee H; Debreczeni J; Breed J; Tentarelli S; Aquila B; Dowling JE; Whitty A; Grimster NP A Study of the Reactivity of S(VI)−F Containing Warheads with Nucleophilic Amino-Acid Side Chains under Physiological Conditions. Org. Biomol. Chem 2017, 15 (45), 9685–9695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Chinthakindi PK; Kruger HG; Govender T; Naicker T; Arvidsson PI On-Water Synthesis of Biaryl Sulfonyl Fluorides. J. Org. Chem 2016, 81 (6), 2618–2623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).(a) Shreiber ST; Molander GA Alkyl (Het)Arylsulfones from SuFEx Reagents via Photochemical S−F Bond Activation. Org. Lett 2023, 25 (12), 2084–2087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Mukherjee P; Woroch CP; Cleary L; Rusznak M; Franzese RW; Reese MR; Tucker JW; Humphrey JM; Etuk SM; Kwan SC; am Ende CW; Ball ND Sulfonamide Synthesis via Calcium Triflimide Activation of Sulfonyl Fluorides. Org. Lett 2018, 20 (13), 3943–3947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Han B; Khasnavis SR; Nwerem M; Bertagna M; Ball ND; Ogba OM Calcium Bistriflimide-Mediated Sulfur(VI)−Fluoride Exchange (SuFEx): Mechanistic Insights toward Instigating Catalysis. Inorg. Chem 2022, 61 (25), 9746–9755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).(a) Magre M; Cornella J Redox-Neutral Organometallic Elementary Steps at Bismuth: Catalytic Synthesis of Aryl Sulfonyl Fluorides. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2021, 143 (51), 21497–21502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lo PK; Chen Y; Willis MC Nickel(II)-Catalyzed Synthesis of Sulfinates from Aryl and Heteroaryl Boronic Acids and the Sulfur Dioxide Surrogate DABSO. ACS Catal. 2019, 9 (12), 10668–10673. [Google Scholar]; (c) Debergh JR; Niljianskul N; Buchwald SL Synthesis of Aryl Sulfonamides via Palladium-Catalyzed Chlorosulfonylation of Aryl Boronic Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135 (29), 10638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).(a) Davies AT; Curto JM; Bagley SW; Willis MC One-Pot Palladium-Catalyzed Synthesis of Sulfonyl Fluorides from Aryl Bromides. Chem. Sci 2017, 8 (2), 1233–1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Tribby AL; Rodríguez I; Shariffudin S; Ball ND Pd-Catalyzed Conversion of Aryl Iodides to Sulfonyl Fluorides Using SO2 Surrogate DABSO and Selectfluor. J. Org. Chem 2017, 82 (4), 2294–2299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Lou TS; Kawamata Y; Ewing T; Correa-Otero GA; Collins MR; Baran PS Scalable, Chemoselective Nickel Electrocatalytic Sulfinylation of Aryl Halides with SO2. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2022, 61 (37), No. e2022080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).(a) Liu Y; Yu D; Guo Y; Xiao J-C; Chen Q-Y; Liu C Arenesulfonyl Fluoride Synthesis via Copper-Catalyzed Fluorosulfonylation of Arenediazonium Salts. Org. Lett 2020, 22 (6), 2281–2286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhong T; Pang M-K; Chen Z-D; Zhang B; Weng J; Lu G Copper-Free Sandmeyer-Type Reaction for the Synthesis of Sulfonyl Fluorides. Org. Lett 2020, 22 (8), 3072–3078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Májek M; Neumeier M; Jacobi von Wangelin A Aromatic Chlorosulfonylation by Photoredox Catalysis. ChemSusChem 2017, 10 (1), 151–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).(a) Gómez-Palomino A; Cornella J Selective Late-stage Sulfonyl Chloride Formation from Sulfonamides Enabled by Pyry-BF4. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2019, 58 (50), 18235–18239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Laudadio G; Bartolomeu A. de; Verwijlen LM; Cao Y; de Oliveira KT; Noël T Sulfonyl Fluoride Synthesis through Electrochemical Oxidative Coupling of Thiols and Potassium Fluoride. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141 (30), 11832–11836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Banks RE; Besheesh MK; Mohialdin-Khaffaf SN; Sharif I N-Halogeno Compounds. Part 18. 1-Alkyl-4-Fluoro-1,4-Diazoniabicyclo[2.2.2]Octane Salts: User-Friendly Site-Selective Electrophilic Fluorinating Agents of the N-Fluoroammonium Class. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1996, 1 (16), 2069–2076. [Google Scholar]
- (25).Nguyen VT; Haug GC; Nguyen VD; Vuong NT; Karki GB; Arman HD; Larionov OV Functional Group Divergence and the Structural Basis of Acridine Photocatalysis Revealed by Direct Decarboxysulfonylation. Chem. Sci 2022, 13 (14), 4170–4179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Xu P; López-Rojas P; Ritter T Radical Decarboxylative Carbometalation of Benzoic Acids: A Solution to Aromatic Decarboxylative Fluorination. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2021, 143 (14), 5349–5354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Chen TQ; Pedersen PS; Dow NW; Fayad R; Hauke CE; Rosko MC; Danilov EO; Blakemore DC; Dechert-Schmitt A-M; Knauber T; Castellano FN; MacMillan DWC A Unified Approach to Decarboxylative Halogenation of (Hetero)Aryl Carboxylic Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2022, 144 (18), 8296–8305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Dow NW; Pedersen PS; Chen TQ; Blakemore DC; Dechert-Schmitt A-M; Knauber T; MacMillan DWC Decarboxylative Borylation and Cross-Coupling of (Hetero)Aryl Acids Enabled by Copper Charge Transfer Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2022, 144 (14), 6163–6172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Su W; Xu P; Ritter T Decarboxylative Hydroxylation of Benzoic Acids. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2021, 60 (45), 24012–24017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Xu P; Su W; Ritter T Decarboxylative Sulfoximination of Benzoic Acids Enabled by Photoinduced Ligand-to-Copper Charge Transfer. Chem. Sci 2022, 13 (45), 13611–13616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).For recent reviews on the applications of open-shelled intermediates generated via LMCT, see:; (a) Juliá F Ligand-to-Metal Charge Transfer (LMCT) Photochemistry at 3D-Metal Complexes: An Emerging Tool for Sustainable Organic Synthesis. ChemCatChem 2022, 14 (19), No. e202200916. [Google Scholar]; (b) Abderrazak Y; Bhattacharyya A; Reiser O Visible-light-induced Homolysis of Earth-abundant Metal-substrate Complexes: A Complementary Activation Strategy in Photoredox Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2021, 60 (39), 21100–21115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).(a) Qiu G; Zhou K; Gao L; Wu J Insertion of sulfur dioxide via a radical process: an efficient route to sulfonyl compounds. Org. Chem. Front 2018, 5, 691–705. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ye S; Li X; Xie W; Wu J Photoinduced Sulfonylation Reactions Through the Insertion of Sulfur Dioxide. Eur. J. Org. Chem 2020, 2020, 1274–1287. [Google Scholar]; (c) Hofman K; Liu N-W; Manolikakes G Radicals and Sulfur Dioxide: A Versatile Combination for the Construction of Sulfonyl Containing Molecules. Chem. - Eur. J 2018, 24, 11852–11863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Sarver PJ; Bissonnette NB; MacMillan DWC Decatungstate-Catalyzed C(sp3)−H Sulfinylation: Rapid Access to Diverse Organosulfur Functionality. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2021, 143 (26), 9737–9743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Jin S; Haug GC; Trevino R; Nguyen VD; Arman HD; Larionov OV Photoinduced C(sp3)−H Sulfination Empowers the Direct and Chemoselective Introduction of the Sulfonyl Group. Chem. Sci 2021, 12 (41), 13914–13921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).(a) Chateauneuf J; Lusztyk J; Ingold KU Spectroscopic and kinetic characteristics of aroyloxyl radicals. 1. The 4-methoxybenzoyloxyl radical. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1988, 110, 2877–2885. [Google Scholar]; (b) Chateauneuf J; Lusztyk J; Ingold KU Spectroscopic and kinetic characteristics of aroyloxyl radicals. 2. Benzoyloxyl and ring-substituted aroyloxyl radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1988, 110, 2886–2893. [Google Scholar]; (c) Misawa H; Sawabe K; Takahara S; Sakuragi H; Tokumaru K Decarboxylation Rates of Benzoyloxyl Radicals as Determined by Laser Flash Photolysis. Further Insight into the Mechanism for Photodecomposition of Dibenzoyl Peroxides. Chem. Lett 1988, 17, 357–360. [Google Scholar]; (d) Fokin AA; Schreiner PR Chem. Rev 2002, 102, 1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Mukherjee S; Maji B; Tlahuext-Aca A; Glorius F Visible-Light-Promoted Activation of Unactivated C(sp3)−H Bonds and Their Selective Trifluoromethylthiolation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138 (50), 16200–16203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Le CC; Wismer MK; Shi Z-C; Zhang R; Conway DV; Li G; Vachal P; Davies IW; MacMillan DW C. A General Small-Scale Reactor to Enable Standardization and Acceleration of Photocatalytic Reactions. ACS Cent. Sci 2017, 3, 647–653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).For reviews on the incorporation of SO2 and SO2 surrogates, see:; (a) Blum SP; Hofman K; Manolikakes G; Waldvogel SR Advances in Photochemical and Electrochemical Incorporation of Sulfur Dioxide for the Synthesis of Value-Added Compounds. Chem. Commun 2021, 57 (67), 8236–8249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Emmett EJ; Willis MC The Development and Application of Sulfur Dioxide Surrogates in Synthetic Organic Chemistry. Asian J. Org. Chem 2015, 4 (7), 602–611. [Google Scholar]; (c) Liu G; Fan C; Wu J Fixation of Sulfur Dioxide into Small Molecules. Org. Biomol. Chem 2015, 13 (6), 1592–1599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Ye S; Qiu G; Wu J Inorganic Sulfites as the Sulfur Dioxide Surrogates in Sulfonylation Reactions. Chem. Commun 2019, 55 (8), 1013–1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).For an additional recent example employing stock solutions of SO2 in an electrocatalytic reaction, see:; Blum SP; Schäffer L; Schollmeyer D; Waldvogel SR Electrochemical Synthesis of Sulfamides. Chem. Commun 2021, 57 (39), 4775–4778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Amines and SO2 are known to react readily to form Lewis adducts:; (a) Hata T; Kinumaki S Reactions of Ammonia and Aliphatic Amines with Sulphur Dioxide. Nature. 1964, 203, 1378–1379. [Google Scholar]; (b) Douglas JE; Kollman PA Trimethylamine-SO2, the Prototype Strong Charge-Transfer Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1978, 100 (16), 5226–5227. [Google Scholar]
- (38).(a) Lovering F; Bikker J; Humblet C Escape from Flatland: Increasing Saturation as an Approach to Improving Clinical Success. J. Med. Chem 2009, 52 (21), 6752–6756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Auberson YP; Brocklehurst C; Furegati M; Fessard TC; Koch G; Decker A; La Vecchia L; Briard E Improving Nonspecific Binding and Solubility: Bicycloalkyl Groups and Cubanes as Para-Phenyl Bioisosteres. ChemMedChem. 2017, 12 (8), 590–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Talele TT The “Cyclopropyl Fragment” Is a Versatile Player That Frequently Appears in Preclinical/Clinical Drug Molecules. J. Med. Chem 2016, 59 (19), 8712–8756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Bär RM; Gross PJ; Nieger M; Bräse S Sodium Bicyclo[1.1.1]Pentanesulfinate: A Bench-stable Precursor for Bicyclo[1.1.1]Pentylsulfones and Bicyclo- [1.1.1]Pentanesulfonamides. Chem.— Eur. J 2020, 26 (19), 4242–4245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).In the context of commercial prices for acid starting materials, inexpensive was defined as less than $30 per 1 gram across all commercial vendors using the Reaxys database. Reaxys; Elsevier. https://www.reaxys.com/#/search/quick (accessed 2023-06-30). [Google Scholar]
- (41).Sulfonyl chlorides were classified as prohibitively expensive if their price exceeded $100 per 1 gram across all commercial vendors using the Reaxys database. Reaxys; Elsevier. https://www.reaxys.com/#/search/quick (accessed 2023-06-30). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
