Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Oct 2;70(Suppl 4):e29974. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29974

Imaging of Pediatric Neuroblastoma: A COG Diagnostic Imaging Committee/SPR Oncology Committee White Paper

Hollie A Lai 1, Susan E Sharp 2, Aashim Bhatia 3, Kelly R Dietz 4, Beth McCarville 5, Dhanashree Rajderkar 6, Sabah Servaes 7, Barry L Shulkin 8, Sudha Singh 9, Andrew T Trout 10, Pankaj Watal 11, Marguerite T Parisi 12
PMCID: PMC10680359  NIHMSID: NIHMS1941534  PMID: 36184716

Abstract

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid neoplasm in children. This manuscript provides consensus-based imaging recommendations for pediatric neuroblastoma patients at diagnosis and during follow-up.

Keywords: Neuroblastoma, Imaging, Staging, Response

INTRODUCTION

Neuroblastoma (NB), the most common extracranial solid neoplasm in children, accounts for approximately 6-8% (1, 2) of all pediatric tumors and 15% of pediatric oncologic deaths (3). The majority (90%) of cases present before 5 years of age (2). Although 65% of NB arise in the abdomen, typically in the adrenal gland, NB can arise anywhere along the sympathetic nervous system (3).

Presenting signs and symptoms are highly variable, ranging from an asymptomatic mass to critical illness. Clinical manifestations may arise secondary to tumor growth, invasion of or mass effect on surrounding structures, the presence of metastatic disease, paraneoplastic syndromes, or autoimmune response (4). Metastatic disease to lymph nodes, bone, bone marrow, or skin is present in approximately 50% of patients at presentation (5).

Prognosis of NB varies widely. Patient age, stage, and various biologic factors present at diagnosis are among the most important prognostic factors in overall survival. Both anatomic and functional imaging are crucial to accurately determine patient stage prior to biopsy or surgery.

IMAGING IN TUMOR STAGING

The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Task Force was formed in 2004 to develop a pre-treatment risk stratification system as well as a new image-based staging system, the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System (INRGSS), which could then be used to identify homogenous pre-treatment groups for risk-based clinical trials (6,7). The INRG Staging System, which accounts for stage, age, histologic category, grade of tumor differentiation, the status of the MYCN oncogene, chromosome 11q status, and DNA ploidy as well as an image based staging system, is not intended to replace, but rather to be used in conjunction with the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS), the former system where NB staging was based on the extent of surgical tumor excision (6,7).

The INRGSS is a pretreatment staging system based on imaging findings, particularly the presence or absence of image-defined risk factors (IDRFs) and distant metastatic disease (8). 20 IDRFs that make safe, total tumor resection impractical at diagnosis were identified. IDRFs were based on the International Society of Pediatric Oncology European Neuroblastoma Research Network (SIOPEN) “surgical risk factors” which were demonstrated to be highly predictive of event free survival (8, 9). The INRG image-based staging system (INRGSS), modified from Brisse, et al. (10) is categorized in Table 1.

Table 1.

International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System (INRGSS)

Tumor Stage Description
L1 Localized tumor not involving vital structures (no IDRFs present) and confined to one body compartment.
L2 Local-regional tumor (may be ipsilaterally contiguous within body compartments) with one or more IDRFs.
M Distant metastatic disease (except stage MS).
MS Metastatic disease in children younger than 18 months with metastases confined to skin, liver, and/or bone marrow (involving less than 10% of all nucleated cells in culture smears or biopsy samples).

In the INRGSS, localized disease (L1) or the presence of one or more IDRFs (L2) at diagnosis is the most statistically significant prognostic factor (7). In one study of 661 patients, those with INRGSS stage L2 disease had significantly lower 5-year event-free survival than those with INRGSS stage L1 disease (78% ± 4% versus 90% ± 3%; P .0010) (8).

Combinations of INRGSS stage, tumor histology and biology (MYCN oncogene status, chromosome 11q status, DNA ploidy) and patient age are used to stratify NB patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups that determine treatment options (11).

IMAGING AT DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING

According to the current INRG recommendations, diagnostic and staging evaluations of NB must include anatomic imaging with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), depending on the primary site of disease (10), and functional imaging with 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-mIBG). 18Fluorine-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (18F-FDG PET-CT) is currently recommended for non-mIBG avid tumors (12). (Grade A; SOR: 1.08)

CT or MRI of the primary tumor and adjacent structures is mandatory to identify IDRF’s (10). Both CT and MR can adequately identify IDRFs, though the greater soft tissue contrast of MR may provide better characterization of some (10). If not included in imaging of the primary tumor site and adjacent structures, CT of the chest is recommended to define the presence of pulmonary metastatic disease while CT or MRI of the abdomen is recommended to define the presence of hepatic metastases (10). High B value diffusion weighted imaging may be included in diagnostic MR imaging protocols as it has shown value in differentiating malignant (NB and ganglioneuroblastoma [GNB]) from benign (ganglioneuroma) neuroblastic tumors (13,14). (Grade B; SOR 2.25) Diffusion imaging may also be useful in detecting small metastases in solid viscera, especially the liver (13,14).

While ultrasound may be initially used to evaluate a suspected mass, it is not useful in tumor staging [10]. (Grade A; SOR 1.0)

123I-mIBG scintigraphy is highly specific (83-100%) and sensitive (88-93%) for NB (1517); and is recommended by international consensus guidelines for staging, therapeutic response monitoring, prognostication, and determining eligibility for 131I-mIBG therapy (18). Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or SPECT/CT should be performed, where available, due to superior sensitivity and improved anatomic localization, allowing for the differentiation of physiologic from pathologic uptake (12, 19). (Grade A; SOR: 1.08) In addition to a qualitative interpretation, a semiquantitative score using either the Curie or SIOPEN method based on planar imaging, should be included in the final report (12,18). The mIBG-avid or non-avid nature of the tumor and the extent of mIBG-avid disease based on the semiquantitative score at initial diagnosis have significant prognostic value in high-risk patients (12, 20, 21, 22). (Grade A; SOR 1.42)

Approximately 10% of NB lack, or have poor, mIBG avidity (16,18). In such cases, a 99mTechnetium methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) bone scan can be performed if time-critical and 18F-FDG, the recommended functional imaging alternative, is not available. When 18F-FDG is performed, true whole body (vertex to toes) imaging should be performed.

FDG PET/CT should not be used in place of mIBG when there is mIBG avid disease because it has a lower sensitivity and specificity for neuroblastoma (2327) and can result in the misinterpretation of disease burden when FDG accumulates in non-malignant lesions. Identification of marrow involvement by NB, usually apparent on 123I-mIBG scans, can be difficult on FDG scans due to physiologic marrow uptake and marrow changes that can occur as a result of chemotherapy or granulocyte colony stimulating factor (24). Furthermore, FDG PET/CT cannot be used to identify candidates for 131I-mIBG therapy. See tables 2, 3, 4, and 5.

Table 2:

Advantages and disadvantages of each modality for the evaluation of the primary tumor.

Procedure Name Timepoint(s) Advantage(s) Disadvantage(s)
Ultrasound    • Diagnosis    • Readily available
   • Portable
   • No ionizing radiation
   • Cannot be used for staging
Computed Tomography    • Diagnosis
   • Staging
   • Therapeutic response monitoring
   • Surveillance
   • Accessible
   • Rapid image acquisition
   • Excellent spatial resolution
   • Multiplanar capabilities
   • Assess relationship between mass and adjacent vessels as well as vessel patency
   • Necessary for detection of lung lesions
   • Frequent surgeon preference
   • Exposure to ionizing radiation
   • Risk of IV contrast
Magnetic Resonance Imaging    • Diagnosis
   • Staging
   • Therapeutic response monitoring
   • Surveillance
   • Exceptional contrast resolution
   • Multiplanar capabilities
   • No ionizing radiation
   • Excellent lesion detection and characterization
   • Valuable for intraspinal extension
   • Motion sensitive
   • Frequent need for sedation
   • Frequent artifacts
   • Difficult to detect small calcified lesions
   • Risk of IV contrast
18F FDG PET    • Diagnosis
   • Staging
   • Therapeutic response monitoring
   • Surveillance
   • Useful for non- or poorly mIBG avid NB    • Exposure to ionizing radiation
   • Frequent need for sedation
123I mIBG    • Diagnosis
   • Staging
   • Therapeutic response monitoring
   • Prognostication in high-risk groups
   • Determination of eligibility for 131I mIBG therapy
   • Surveillance
   • Highly specific (83-100%) and sensitive (88-93%).    • Exposure to ionizing radiation
   • Frequent need for sedation (with use of SPECT or SPECT/CT)

Table 3a:

Suggested MR protocol for evaluation of a primary tumor located in the chest, abdomen, and/or pelvis.

Plane Sequence Contrast phase Coverage Required/Optional Comment
Coronal T1 Noncontrast Site of primary tumorin the chest and/orabdomen/pelvis) Required Slicethickness/Gap 5 skip 1
Coronal T2 RTr FS Noncontrast Required Consider STIR if fat saturation is inhomogeneous
Axial SSFSE No FS Noncontrast Required Slicethickness/Gap 5 skip 1
Axial T2 RTr FS Noncontrast Required
Axial DWI Noncontrast Required 3 b values: 10, 100, 800.
Diffusion direction = ALL.
Axial T1 FS Pre-contrast Required Free breathingor breath hold
Axial T1 FS Post-contrast Required Free breathing or breath hold
Coronal T1 FS Post-contrast Required Free breathing or breath hold

Table 4:

Suggested CT protocol for evaluation of the primary tumor and image-defined risk factors.

Name Coverage Slice thickness Contrast phase Reformat planes/types/ reconstruction kernel Comment
CT Site of primary tumor (ie neck, chest, and/or abdomen/pelvis) and chest if not site of primary tumor 3 – 5 mm (based on body region and patient size) Post contrast Coronal & sagittal MPR

Table 5:

Suggested nuclear medicine protocols for evaluation of neuroblastoma

Study name Patient prep Radiopharmaceutical Dose range Delivery Time from dose to imaging Imaging acquisition Comment
123I mIBG Pretreatment with saturated solution of potassium iodide or potassium iodate tablets for thyroid blockade (dosing varies by local practice)

The EANM Paediatric Committee guidelines recommend the following:

Beginning on the day before tracer injection until the day after injection, children from one month to three years should receive 32 mg potassium iodide daily, from three to thirteen years 65 mg, and over this age 130 mg daily. Newborns receive 16 mg potassium iodide only on the day before tracer injection (61).
123 I-MIBG (Meta-iodobenzylguanindine) 0.14 mCi/kg

(Minimum dose 1 mCi

Maximum dose 10 mCi) (62)
Intravenous 24 hours and possibly 48 hours (if needed) Planar:
Anterior and posterior whole body images are obtained (can be spot images of overlapping body segments if needed).
Lateral views of the skull (if needed).

SPECT or SPECT/CT:
Centered on areas where further information is needed

120 projections, 3 degree steps, continuous or step-and-shoot
mode, 25–35 seconds/step, 128 × 128 matrix.
CT performed as a non-contrast localization CT or as a contrast enhanced diagnostic CT with appropriate pediatric CT settings.
Medium energy collimators may be used to improve image quality.
F-18-FDG NPO for 4-6 hours to decrease serum glucose and insulin levels.
Warm the patient for 30 – 60 minutes prior to FDG injection to minimize uptake in brown adipose tissue.
F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) 0.10-0.14 mCi/kg

Minimum dose 0.7 mCi (62)
Intravenous ~60 minutes PET/CT or PET/MR acquisition (depending on availability and local practice)
CT can be performed as a non-contrast localization CT or as a contrast enhanced diagnostic CT with appropriate pediatric CT settings.
True whole body field of view (skull vertex to feet)

IMAGING AT FOLLOW-UP

The schedule for follow-up imaging will depend on individual treatment regimens and whether patients have low, intermediate, or high-risk disease (18).

Anatomic imaging is used to determine the size of measurable lesions (i.e., the primary tumor and sites of soft tissue disease) (28). 3D measurements on anatomic imaging are more accurate, with underestimation of response on 1D and 2D measurements (29).

The same modality used at diagnosis should be used at all follow-up time points. If MRI is utilized, the inclusion of high B-value diffusion weighted imaging is suggested on all follow-up scans (13). Anatomic imaging is not used to evaluate bone disease, as bone lesions may not decrease in size when assessed by CT or MRI, even when there is no remaining viable tumor. Bone lesions without an associated soft tissue mass are non-measurable while extramedullary soft tissue components of bone lesions are measurable using the same criteria as soft tissue lesions (28).

Functional imaging is used to evaluate therapeutic response in both the primary tumor and sites of soft tissue and osteomedullary metastatic disease (6, 12, 18, 28). Functional imaging is key in differentiating postoperative changes from residual tumor at sites of resected soft tissue disease (25). The semiquantitative scoring method (Curie or SIOPEN) used at baseline should be used at follow-up (21, 28). Additionally, a “relative” Curie or SIOPEN osteomedullary score should be reported. The “relative bone score” is the ratio of the Curie or SIOPEN scores at response assessment to those at diagnosis, without the soft tissue component. If FDG PET/CT is being used, a tissue biopsy of at least one FDG avid may be needed to confirm that the lesion is NB or GNB (28).

TUMOR RESPONSE ASSESSMENT

Utilizing the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (6 28) response of the primary tumor and metastatic deposits is determined using both anatomic imaging with CT or MR as well as functional imaging with mIBG or FDG if the tumor is non-mIBG avid (28) in addition to bone marrow aspirate and biopsy (Table 6). (Grade A; SOR 1.17)

Table 6:

Treatment Response Criteria (Anatomic & Functional Response) (25)

PRIMARY SOFT TISSUE TUMOR RESPONSE
Complete Response (CR):    • < 10 mm residual soft tissue at primary site AND
   • Complete resolution of mIBG or FDG uptake (for MIBG-non-avid tumors) at primary site
Partial Response (PR)
   • ≥ 30% decrease in longest diameter of primary site AND
   • mIBG or FDG uptake at primary site stable, improved, or resolved
Progressive Disease (PD)    • > 20% increase in longest diameter taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study) AND
   • Minimum absolute increase of 5 mm in longest dimension
Stable Disease (SD)    • Neither sufficient shrinkage for PR nor sufficient increase for PD at the primary site
SOFT TISSUE AND OSTEOMEDULLARY METASTATIC TUMOR RESPONSE
Complete Response (CR): Resolution of all sites of disease, defined as:
   • Nonprimary target and nontarget lesions measure, 10 mm AND
   • Lymph nodes identified as target lesions decrease to a short axis < 10 mm AND
   • mIBG uptake or FDG uptake (for non mIBG avid tumors) of nonprimary lesions resolves completely
Partial Response (PR)
> 30% decrease in sum of diameters of nonprimary target lesions compared with baseline AND all of the following:
   • Nontarget lesions may be stable or smaller in size AND
   • No new lesions AND ≥ 50% reduction in mIBG absolute bone score (relative mIBG bone score ≥ 0.1 to ≤ 0.5) or ≥ 50% reduction in number of FDG avid bone lesions

Progressive Disease (PD)
Any of the following:
   • Any new soft tissue lesion detected by CT/MRI that is also mIBG avid or FDG avid
   • Any new soft tissue lesion seen on anatomic imaging that is biopsied and confirmed to be neuroblastoma or ganglioneuroblastoma
   • Any new bone site that is mIBG avid
   • A new bone site that is FDG avid (for mIBG-nonavid tumors) AND has CT/MRI findings consistent with tumor OR has been confirmed histologically to be neuroblastoma or ganglioneuroblastoma
   • > 20% increase in longest diameter taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study) AND minimum absolute increase of 5 mm in sum of diameters of target soft tissue lesions
   • Relative mIBG score ≥ 1.2
Stable Disease (SD)    • Neither sufficient shrinkage for PR nor sufficient increase for PD at the primary site

Response to treatment is strongly associated with outcome. In the COG ANBL0531 (NCT00499616) study, 6 of 20 intermediate-risk patients with a poor response to initial therapy subsequently developed progressive or recurrent disease, and one died of disease (30). A Curie or SIOPEN score greater than 2 or 3, respectively, after completion of induction therapy predicts a poor prognosis for patients with MYCN-nonamplified high-risk tumors while a Curie score greater than 0 is associated with a worse outcome in those with MYCN-amplified disease (21, 22, 31).

Surveillance imaging

There is no uniform consensus for timing of surveillance imaging. It is typically based on risk group and often protocol driven.

Anatomic Imaging:

Low-risk, congenital or localized, abdominal, or pelvic NB without risk of epidural extension can be followed by ultrasound every 1-2 months for one year and then yearly for 3 years (32, 33).

Intermediate risk NB with favorable biology and without risk of epidural extension can be followed with ultrasound every 3 months for the first year, every 4 months for one year, then yearly for 3 years. (32)

Contrast enhanced CT (CECT), when used, should include the primary site in addition to adjacent areas of the body. Intermediate risk NB with unfavorable biology, or any tumor with risk for epidural extension, should be followed by MRI. In intermediate risk patients, MR and CT should be performed in conjunction with scintigraphic studies every 3 months for one year, every 6 months for one year, then yearly for 3 years. In high-risk patients, anatomic and functional imaging should be performed every 3 months for 2 years, every 4 months for a year, then yearly for 3 years. (32)

Scintigraphic studies:

Due to its lower sensitivity for detecting relapse compared with 123I-mIBG, whole-body 99mTc-MDP bone scan is not indicated for routine surveillance (34). (Grade A; SOR 1.17)

In high-risk NB, 123I-mIBG with SPECT/CT has been shown to improve detection of disease, particularly after relapse. In patients with a history of non-mIBG avid disease, 18F-FDG PET/CT is currently recommended for surveillance.

The timing of surveillance studies should be customized for each patient’s risk for relapse as described above. Surveillance is typically initiated 3 years from the start of treatment in the setting of remission (34).

Imaging late effects:

Surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, bone marrow transplantation, and131I-mIBG therapy in patients with high-risk NB- have known consequences. Recognizing the sequela of therapy is critical for both the quality and duration of life of the cancer survivor. Imaging can identify some late treatment effects not evident by physical exam or laboratory studies.

Many chronic health conditions that develop because of treatment are related to the location of the primary tumor or metastatic disease and the type of surgery or chemotherapy the patient received. A well-known late effect of treatment for NB is the development of scoliosis secondary to radiation therapy to the paraspinal region. 131I-mIBG therapy alone or in conjunction with bone marrow transplant can cause hepatotoxicity. Hypothyroidism occurs in up to 10% of patients by one year after 131I-mIBG therapy, despite the use of thyroid blockade (35).

Perhaps the most devastating late effect is the development of secondary malignancy, which occurs in 3-12% of survivors of childhood cancers (36, 37). The risk of second malignancies in patients treated for NB increases with exposure to radiation therapy. In NB patients treated with 131I-mIBG therapy, the incidence of secondary malignancy, typically acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome is as high as 3% by 3 years post treatment (35). Surveillance imaging for second primary malignancies should be tailored to the patient’s risk level (38).

Future Directions in Imaging Neuroblastoma

CT, MRI, and 123I-mIBG planar and SPECT/CT imaging will remain essential imaging tools for the diagnosis, staging, therapeutic response monitoring and surveillance of patients with neuroblastoma. 123I-mIBG imaging provides prognostic information and is used to select patients appropriate for 131I-mIBG therapy.

Newer PET agents may provide several advantages to 123I-mIBG planar and SPECT/CT imaging including higher spatial resolution, improved tumor-to- background ratios, same day administration and imaging, quantification of tracer uptake, and much shorter imaging times, which should decrease motion artifacts and the length of sedation (27). The increased sensitivity afforded by their use may more accurately quantify disease burden, leading to improvements in staging, prognostication, and treatment management.

68-Gallium DOTATATE and other DOTA peptides

68Ga-DOTATATE, 64Cu-DOTATATE and 68Ga-DOTATOC, are somatostatin analogues suitable for PET imaging. Most neuroblastomas and other neuroendocrine tumors such as pheochromocytoma express somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSRT2) (3941). In limited studies to date, 68Ga-DOTATATE or 68Ga-DOTATOC appeared to be more sensitive that 123I-mIBG in the detection of NB lesions (4245). Physiologic radiotracer uptake in the spleen, adrenal glands, liver, pancreas, particularly the uncinate process, gut and urinary tract may hinder identification of small volume disease (27). 68Ga-DOTA peptide imaging may be negative in tumors with low SSRT expression as can occur in poorly differentiated tumors (45). False positives findings can occur when benign processes, including infection, inflammation, or sites of osteoblastic activity, mimic focal metastatic lesions. (27, 46)

Initial reports suggested that 68Ga-DOTA peptides may be safe and feasible for use in children. Their short half-life allows for 1-day imaging protocols and results in a lower radiation dose than either 123I- or 18F-labeled tracers (27). Further, 68Ga-DOTA positive patients can be considered for treatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with Lutetium-177 DOTATATE whose safety and efficacy were demonstrated in small groups of neuroblastoma patients with relapsed or refractory disease (42, 47, 48). Despite several apparent advantages, as well as the increasing, off-label use of these agents in the evaluation of non-mIBG-avid neuroblastoma patients, there is not yet an established role for 68Ga-DOTA peptide imaging in the current NB imaging guidelines (27).

18F Fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-FDOPA)

When labeled with 18F, FDOPA, the precursor of dopamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine, localizes in sites of increased catecholamine metabolism (49). This agent is used to image neuroendocrine tumors including NB, often as an alternative to 68Ga-DOTA peptide imaging (50). Early, prospective studies in NB reported increased lesion detection with 18F-FDOPA compared to 123I-mIBG planar imaging (51, 52). A more recent study comparing 18F-FDOPA to 123I-mIBG imaging with planar and SPECT/CT imaging for NB confirmed the increased sensitivity of 18F-FDOPA in the detection of soft tissue as well as small osseous lesions, both at diagnosis and after chemotherapy (53). These same authors (53) as well as Lu, et al (51) also demonstrated that 18F-FDOPA may reveal persistent disease in the face of a negative 123I-mIBG scan. Currently 18F-FDOPA does not have a role in neuroblastoma imaging guidelines.

124I-mIBG

mIBG labeled with 124I, has a similar uptake mechanism and biodistribution to 123I-mIBG but demonstrates increased sensitivity in disease detection (54, 55). The routine use of 124I-mIBG in children with NB is problematic as, even with dose modifications (56), it delivers a high patient radiation dose compared to 123I-mIBG. Other issues with 124I-mIBG include poorer image quality compared to 18F or 68Ga; 2-day imaging protocol, limited availability, and high cost (27). However, given its’ long half-life, 124I-mIBG could prove useful in personalized dosimetry estimation for 131I-mIBG therapy (57).

18F-mFBG

Meta [18F] Fluorobenzylguanidine (18F-mFBG), a fluorinated mIBG analog labeled with 18F, has a similar uptake mechanism and biodistribution to that of 123I-mIBG with the added benefits of fast pharmacokinetics and faster renal clearance, resulting in a 3-fold higher tumor uptake of the tracer compared to 123I-mIBG (58). While human experience with this tracer is limited, advantages of its use include a same day imaging protocol and patient radiation exposures similar or lower than 123I-mIBG (58). An early report by Pandit-Tasker et al (59) showed that 18F-mFBG PET/CT was superior to 123I-mIBG, demonstrating all lesions detected on 123I-mIBG scans in addition to 59 additional lesions in 5 patients with neuroblastoma and 5 patients with pheochromocytoma. A single case reported by Pauwels et al (60), also suggested improved sensitivity and image resolution of 18F-mFBG compared to 123I-mIBG.

More data is needed to clarify the respective roles of 123I-mIBG, 18F-FDG, and the non-FDG PET agents in the management of patients with NB.

Finally, we can anticipate the increased use of theranostic agents such as 131I-mIBG and potentially, 177Lu-Dotatate in the treatment of high-risk NB patients in future clinical trials.

Table 3b:

Suggested MR protocol for evaluation of a primary tumor located in the neck.

Plane Sequence Contrast phase Coverage Required/Optional Comment
Sagittal T2 Noncontrast Site of primary tumorin the neck Required Slicethickness/Gap 5 skip 1
Coronal IR Noncontrast Required Slicethickness/Gap 5 skip 1-2
Axial IR Noncontrast Required Slicethickness/Gap 5 skip 1-2
Axial T1 Pre-contrast Required Slicethickness/Gap 5 skip 1-1.5
Axial DWI Pre-contrast Required 2 b values: 0 and 1000.
Axial T1 FS Post-contrast Required Slice thickness/Gap 5 skip 1-2
Coronal T1 FS Post-contrast Required Slicethickness/Gap 5 skip 1-2

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:

This manuscript was funded in part by the National Clinical Trials Network Operations Center Grant U10CA180886.

Grant number - U10CA180886

ABBREVIATONS

NB

Neuroblastoma

INRG

International Neuroblastoma Risk Group

INRGSS

International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System

INSS

International Neuroblastoma Staging System

IDRFs

Image-Defined Risk Factors

SIOPEN

Society of Pediatric Oncology EuropeanNeuroblastoma Research Network

CECT

Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography

MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

123I-mIBG

123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine

18F-FDG PET-CT

18Fluorine-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/CT

GNB

Ganglioneuroblastoma

SPECT

Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography

99mTc-MDP

99mTechnetium methylene diphosphonate

18F-FDOPA

18F Fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine

18F-mFBG

Meta [18F] Fluorobenzylguanidine

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS:

Dr. Aashim Bhatia, MD, MS is a consultant for Guerbet.

Dr. Andrew T. Trout, MD has the following Conflict of Interests:

Related COIs:

Lantheus – Consultant

Unrelated COIs:

Investigator initiated grant support – Canon Medical Systems, Siemens Healthineers

REFERENCES:

  • 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021 [published correction appears in CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jul;71(4):359]. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results databases. www.seer.cancer.gov.
  • 3. INRGdb.org .
  • 4.Castleberry RP. Biology and treatment of neuroblastoma. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1997;44(4):919–937. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70537-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maris JM, Hogarty MD, Bagatell R, Cohn SL. Neuroblastoma. Lancet. 2007;369(9579):2106–2120. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60983-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, et al. Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(8):1466–1477. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.8.1466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cohn SL, Pearson AD, London WB, et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(2):289–297. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Monclair T, Brodeur GM, Ambros PF, et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(2):298–303. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Matthay KK, George RE, Yu AL. Promising therapeutic targets in neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(10):2740–2753. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brisse HJ, McCarville MB, Granata C, et al. Guidelines for imaging and staging of neuroblastic tumors: consensus report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Project. Radiology. 2011;261(1):243–257. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Irwin MS, Naranjo A, Zhang FF, et al. Revised Neuroblastoma Risk Classification System: A Report From the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(29):3229–3241. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bar-Sever Z, Biassoni L, Shulkin B, et al. Guidelines on nuclear medicine imaging in neuroblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(11):2009–2024. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4070-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Neubauer H, Li M, Müller VR, Pabst T, Beer M. Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Tumor Characterization, Differentiation and Monitoring in Pediatric Patients with Neuroblastic Tumors. Diagnostischer Stellenwert der diffusionsgewichteten MRT zur Tumorcharakterisierung, Tumordifferenzierung und zur Verlaufskontrolle bei pädiatrischen Patienten mit neuroblastischen Tumoren. Rofo. 2017;189(7):640–650. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-108993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gahr N, Darge K, Hahn G, Kreher BW, von Buiren M, Uhl M. Diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation of neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma/ganglioneuroma. Eur J Radiol. 2011;79(3):443–446. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Soyer P, Boudiaf M, Placé V, et al. Preoperative detection of hepatic metastases: comparison of diffusion-weighted, T2-weighted fast spin echo and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging using surgical and histopathologic findings as standard of reference. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80(2):245–252. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sharp SE, Gelfand MJ, Shulkin BL. Pediatrics: diagnosis of neuroblastoma. Semin Nucl Med. 2011;41(5):345–353. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parisi MT, Matthay KK, Huberty JP, Hattner RS. Neuroblastoma: dose-related sensitivity of MIBG scanning in detection. Radiology. 1992;184(2):463–467. doi: 10.1148/radiology.184.2.1620849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Matthay KK, Shulkin B, Ladenstein R, et al. Criteria for evaluation of disease extent by (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scans in neuroblastoma: a report for the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Task Force. Br J Cancer. 2010;102(9):1319–1326. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fukuoka M, Taki J, Mochizuki T, Kinuya S. Comparison of diagnostic value of I-123 MIBG and high-dose I-131 MIBG scintigraphy including incremental value of SPECT/CT over planar image in patients with malignant pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and neuroblastoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36(1):1–7. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181feeb5e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.DuBois SG, Mody R, Naranjo A, et al. MIBG avidity correlates with clinical features, tumor biology, and outcomes in neuroblastoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017;64(11):10.1002/pbc.26545. doi:10.1002/pbc.26545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yanik GA, Parisi MT, Naranjo A, et al. Validation of Postinduction Curie Scores in High-Risk Neuroblastoma: A Children’s Oncology Group and SIOPEN Group Report on SIOPEN/HR-NBL1. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(3):502–508. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.195883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ladenstein R, Lambert B, Pötschger U, et al. Validation of the mIBG skeletal SIOPEN scoring method in two independent high-risk neuroblastoma populations: the SIOPEN/HR-NBL1 and COG-A3973 trials. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(2):292–305. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3829-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shulkin BL, Hutchinson RJ, Castle VP, Yanik GA, Shapiro B, Sisson JC. Neuroblastoma: positron emission tomography with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose compared with metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy. Radiology. 1996;199(3):743–750. doi: 10.1148/radiology.199.3.8637999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sharp SE, Shulkin BL, Gelfand MJ, Salisbury S, Furman WL. 123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET in neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(8):1237–1243. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.060467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Papathanasiou ND, Gaze MN, Sullivan K, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT and 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging in high-risk neuroblastoma: diagnostic comparison and survival analysis. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(4):519–525. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.083303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Taggart DR, Han MM, Quach A, et al. Comparison of iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate response after iodine-131 MIBG therapy for relapsed neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(32):5343–5349. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Samim A, Tytgat GAM, Bleeker G, et al. Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Neuroblastoma: Current Status and New Developments. J Pers Med. 2021;11(4):270. Published 2021 Apr 4. doi: 10.3390/jpm11040270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Park JR, Bagatell R, Cohn SL, et al. Revisions to the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria: A Consensus Statement From the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(22):2580–2587. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Trout AT, Towbin AJ, Klingbeil L, Weiss BD, von Allmen D. Single and multidimensional measurements underestimate neuroblastoma response to therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017;64(1):18–24. doi: 10.1002/pbc.26159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Twist CJ, Schmidt ML, Naranjo A, et al. Maintaining Outstanding Outcomes Using Response- and Biology-Based Therapy for Intermediate-Risk Neuroblastoma: A Report From the Children’s Oncology Group Study ANBL0531. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(34):3243–3255. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yanik GA, Parisi MT, Shulkin BL, et al. Semiquantitative mIBG scoring as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma: a report from the Children’s oncology group. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(4):541–548. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.112334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kushner BH. Neuroblastoma: a disease requiring a multitude of imaging studies. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(7):1172–1188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Papaioannou G, McHugh K. Neuroblastoma in childhood: review and radiological findings. Cancer Imaging. 2005;5(1):116–127. Published 2005 Sep 30. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kushner BH, Kramer K, Modak S, Cheung NK. Sensitivity of surveillance studies for detecting asymptomatic and unsuspected relapse of high-risk neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(7):1041–1046. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.6107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Parisi MT, Eslamy H, Park JR, Shulkin BL, Yanik GA. ¹³¹I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine Theranostics in Neuroblastoma: Historical Perspectives; Practical Applications. Semin Nucl Med. 2016;46(3):184–202. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2016.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Parisi MT, Fahmy JL, Kaminsky CK, Malogolowkin MH. Complications of cancer therapy in children: a radiologist’s guide. Radiographics. 1999;19(2):283–297. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.19.2.g99mr05283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shelmerdine SC, Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Nathan PC, Kaste SC. Imaging of late complications of cancer therapy in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(3):254–266. doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3708-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Laverdière C, Liu Q, Yasui Y, et al. Long-term outcomes in survivors of neuroblastoma: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(16):1131–1140. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pauwels E, Cleeren F, Bormans G, Deroose CM. Somatostatin receptor PET ligands - the next generation for clinical practice. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;8(5):311–331. Published 2018 Oct 20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.O’Dorisio MS, Chen F, O’Dorisio TM, Wray D, Qualman SJ. Characterization of somatostatin receptors on human neuroblastoma tumors. Cell Growth Differ. 1994;5(1):1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Georgantzi K, Tsolakis AV, Stridsberg M, Jakobson A, Christofferson R, Janson ET. Differentiated expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes in experimental models and clinical neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56(4):584–589. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kong G, Hofman MS, Murray WK, et al. Initial Experience With Gallium-68 DOTA-Octreotate PET/CT and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Pediatric Patients With Refractory Metastatic Neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2016;38(2):87–96. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gains JE, Aldridge MD, Mattoli MV, et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE and 123I-mIBG as imaging biomarkers of disease localisation in metastatic neuroblastoma: implications for molecular radiotherapy. Nucl Med Commun. 2020;41(11):1169–1177. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kroiss A, Putzer D, Uprimny C, et al. Functional imaging in phaeochromocytoma and neuroblastoma with 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr 3-octreotide positron emission tomography and 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38(5):865–873. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1720-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Alexander N, Marrano P, Thorner P, et al. Prevalence and Clinical Correlations of Somatostatin Receptor-2 (SSTR2) Expression in Neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2019;41(3):222–227. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hofman MS, Lau WF, Hicks RJ. Somatostatin receptor imaging with 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT: clinical utility, normal patterns, pearls, and pitfalls in interpretation. Radiographics. 2015;35(2):500–516. doi: 10.1148/rg.352140164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gains JE, Bomanji JB, Fersht NL, et al. 177Lu-DOTATATE molecular radiotherapy for childhood neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(7):1041–1047. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.085100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Menda Y, O’Dorisio MS, Kao S, et al. Phase I trial of 90Y-DOTATOC therapy in children and young adults with refractory solid tumors that express somatostatin receptors. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(10):1524–1531. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.075226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jager PL, Chirakal R, Marriott CJ, Brouwers AH, Koopmans KP, Gulenchyn KY. 6-L-18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine PET in neuroendocrine tumors: basic aspects and emerging clinical applications. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(4):573–586. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.045708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bozkurt MF, Virgolini I, Balogova S, et al. Guideline for PET/CT imaging of neuroendocrine neoplasms with 68Ga-DOTA-conjugated somatostatin receptor targeting peptides and 18F-DOPA [published correction appears in Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug 30;:]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(9):1588–1601. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3728-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lu MY, Liu YL, Chang HH, et al. Characterization of neuroblastic tumors using 18F-FDOPA PET. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(1):42–49. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.102772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Piccardo A, Lopci E, Conte M, et al. Comparison of 18F-dopa PET/CT and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in stage 3 and 4 neuroblastoma: a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(1):57–71. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1938-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Piccardo A, Morana G, Puntoni M, et al. Diagnosis, Treatment Response, and Prognosis: The Role of 18F-DOPA PET/CT in Children Affected by Neuroblastoma in Comparison with 123I-mIBG Scan: The First Prospective Study. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(3):367–374. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.232553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cistaro A, Quartuccio N, Caobelli F, et al. 124I-MIBG: a new promising positron-emitting radiopharmaceutical for the evaluation of neuroblastoma. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2015;18(2):102–106. doi: 10.5603/NMR.2015.0024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Aboian MS, Huang SY, Hernandez-Pampaloni M, et al. 124I-MIBG PET/CT to Monitor Metastatic Disease in Children with Relapsed Neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(1):43–47. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.243139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Beijst C, de Keizer B, Lam MGEH, Janssens GO, Tytgat GAM, de Jong HWAM. A phantom study: Should 124 I-mIBG PET/CT replace 123 I-mIBG SPECT/CT?. Med Phys. 2017;44(5):1624–1631. doi: 10.1002/mp.12202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Huang SY, Bolch WE, Lee C, et al. Patient-specific dosimetry using pretherapy [124I]m-iodobenzylguanidine ([124I]mIBG) dynamic PET/CT imaging before [131I]mIBG targeted radionuclide therapy for neuroblastoma. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17(2):284–294. doi: 10.1007/s11307-014-0783-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhang H, Huang R, Cheung NK, et al. Imaging the norepinephrine transporter in neuroblastoma: a comparison of [18F]-MFBG and 123I-MIBG. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(8):2182–2191. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pandit-Taskar N, Zanzonico P, Staton KD, et al. Biodistribution and Dosimetry of 18F-Meta-Fluorobenzylguanidine: A First-in-Human PET/CT Imaging Study of Patients with Neuroendocrine Malignancies. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(1):147–153. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pauwels E, Celen S, Vandamme M, et al. Improved resolution and sensitivity of [18F]MFBG PET compared with [123I]MIBG SPECT in a patient with a norepinephrine transporter-expressing tumour. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(1):313–315. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04830-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.European Association of Nuclear Medicine Guideline for Radioiodinated MIBG Scintigraphy in Children. https://www.eanm.org/publications/guidelines/gl_paed_mibg.pdf [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 62.Gelfand MJ, Parisi MT, Treves ST; Pediatric Nuclear Medicine Dose Reduction Workgroup. Pediatric radiopharmaceutical administered doses: 2010 North American consensus guidelines. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(2):318–322. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.084327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES