Abstract
Mechanical thrombectomy has become an important method for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke for large vessel occlusions. The current hotspots of mechanical thrombectomy are optimizing the treatment methods, improving the recanalization rate and reducing complications. The in vitro model has become a common and convenient method for mechanical thrombectomy research. This review summarizes the in vitro model in the following aspects: the preparation of clot analogues; the experimental platform; the application of the in vitro model in the testing of thrombectomy devices; and the advantages, limitations and future trends of the in vitro experimental model. This review describes the characteristics and applications of the in vitro experimental model with the hope that the in vitro experimental model will be further improved and play a more effective role in the study of mechanical thrombectomy.
Keywords: acute ischemic stroke, mechanical thrombectomy, in vitro model, clot, stent retriever
Introduction
Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy has become an important treatment for large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke. The devices used for mechanical thrombectomy are stent retrievers or aspiration catheters. The current successful revascularization rate is approximately 80–90%, 1 and recanalization is associated with good clinical results. There are still some problems with mechanical thrombectomy, such as failed recanalization, distal vessel embolization and vessel injury. Novel devices and therapeutic techniques are constantly emerging to address these problems in the field of endovascular mechanical thrombectomy. In addition to clinical studies, there is a need for faster and less costly methods to study the mechanisms of mechanical thrombectomy and complications and to evaluate new devices and methods.
Common models for mechanical thrombectomy testing are in vitro models and in vivo animal models. 2 Animal models, usually including swine, 3 canine, 4 and rabbit 5 models, could provide a more realistic physiological environment for mechanical thrombectomy and allow for safety evaluation. However, animal experiments require more complex ethical requirements, and the vascular morphology in animals is different from that in humans. In contrast, in vitro experimental devices simulate the morphology of blood vessels, blood flow status, and artificial embolism in an in vitro environment, which is easy and intuitive, and are a good method for evaluating thrombectomy devices. Before the advent of stent retrievers, in vitro experimental methods were used to examine previous generations of cerebral or peripheral vessel thrombectomy devices 6 and study cerebral blood flow characteristics. With the advancement of interventional techniques and the widespread use of stent retrievers and aspiration catheters, the in vitro experimental model has been commonly used in the study of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.
In vitro models play an important role in evaluating the performance of stent retrievers and aspiration catheters and in studying the interaction of devices with clots. Novel devices and methods for mechanical thrombectomy are also commonly tested first by in vitro models. We reviewed the articles on in vitro mechanical thrombectomy test models in recent years and found differences between the articles in the setup of in vitro experiments, including the preparation of clot analogues, the material and shape of the vascular model, and the internal fluid dynamics parameters.
This article reviews the use of in vitro experimental models in acute ischemic stroke for mechanical thrombectomy studies. In this review, we first describe the thrombus preparation for in vitro experiments and the model composition. In these sections, we review the clot analogue prepared under dynamic conditions or made by nonblood materials and pressure and flow monitoring in the fluid circuit, which have been less discussed in previous reviews. Then, we provide an overview of the application of in vitro experimental devices in the study of stent retrievers, aspiration catheters, and some new devices and methods. Finally, we discuss the advantages and limitations of current in vitro models, and we provide an outlook on future trends in this field. Through this article, we hope to gain a clearer understanding of the in vitro experimental model and make it more useful for studies on acute ischemic stroke and the evaluation of new devices and methods.
Clot analogue preparation
In vitro experiments for mechanical thrombectomy often require the preparation of clot analogues, which is also necessary for animal studies of mechanical thrombectomy and research on the characteristics of clots. Blood for the preparation of clot analogues is usually obtained from humans, 7 bovines, 8 ovines 9 and swine. 10
Clot analogues can be prepared in a variety of ways. Coagulation from whole blood under static conditions is a convenient method. Thrombin is commonly added to promote clotting. The clot analogues made by this method are rich in red blood cells. Gralla et al. 11 used thrombin-induced clots in their animal model for mechanical thrombectomy. In their experiment, 25 IU thrombin and 1 g barium sulfate were added to 10 ml swine autologous blood. Barium sulfate allows the clots to have good radiopacity under angiography. A number of subsequent animal studies and in vitro studies are based on this method to produce clot analogues. Some studies made blood clots spontaneously without using thrombin .12,13 Malone et al. found that the structural integrity and stiffness of clot analogues with thrombin addition is increased. 14
The proportion of red blood cells and fibrin in human clots is diverse, and fibrin-rich clots are stiffer and more challenging to retrieve. To evaluate the thrombectomy performance with different types of clots, Duffy et al. 9 proposed a method that controlled the amount of each component in the blood clot. Sodium citrate was immediately added to the collected ovine blood for anticoagulation. Then, the blood was centrifuged to separate the blood constituents. Different ratios of red blood cells and plasma were mixed. After adding calcium chloride and leaving it for approximately half an hour to one hour, clot analogues of varying composition ratios were formed. Clots prepared by this method, especially fibrin-rich clots, have appeared in many in vitro experiments.13,15–19 Platelet-contracted clots 20 and calcified clots 21 have also been made by modifying the above method.
Clots can also be prepared under dynamic conditions. The Chandler loop, first reported in 1958, is used to generate clots by simulating blood flow conditions in vitro. It contains a sealed circular plastic tube with blood in it, and the circular loop usually rotates at approximately 10–30 rounds per minute in a water bath or heated incubator to control the temperature. The Chandler loop has been used to prepare clots in several in vitro studies,19,22–24 and histological examination showed that the red blood cells and fibrin content of the thrombi made by the Chandler loop are similar to those of humans. 25 A number of other studies on the preparation of thrombi have also used dynamic conditions.7,26,27
The composition of clot analogues has an important influence on their mechanical behaviour and the performance of thrombectomy devices.28,29 The histological or mechanical properties of the clot analogues should be similar to those of real clots. Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and Martius scarlet blue (MSB) staining are often used to analyse the fibrin and erythrocyte components of clots. Platelet content in blood clots can be measured by immunohistochemical staining.1,7,30 Scanning electron microscopy can be used to visualize microstructures of clot analogues.18,20,29 There are various methods for testing the mechanical properties of clot analogues, including tensile,14, 27 compression,14,29,31 creep, 14 stress relaxation, 29 indentation,14,18 rheometry 14 and friction testing. 32 Chueh et al. found that clot analogues made from bovine blood are stiffer than human and porcine blood clots. The addition of barium sulfate increases the elasticity of clot analogues. 31 Johnson et al. found that clot analogues showed cyclic loading–unloading hysteresis and stress relaxation behaviour. 29 Thrombi prepared under dynamic conditions have longer tensile lengths and are less likely to break during catheter injection testing. 27
Clot analogues prepared from nonblood materials have been used in some thrombectomy experiments. Polyurethane 33 or a mixture of guar, borax and water 34 are used to fabricate clot analogues to test aspiration catheters. An in vitro study used crustacean haemolymph 35 to make clots. In an animal study, ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer 36 was used to model an ultrahard clot to test the performance of the stent retriever. A study compared the shear modulus and elasticity models of synthetic thrombi made from hydrogels of polyacrylamide and alginate and thrombi made from human blood. 37 Although the mechanical properties of some clot analogues of nonblood materials have been tested,34,37 their frangibility has not been reported, and these materials have not been applied to study distal embolization.
Experimental platforms
The in vitro model for the experimental evaluation of mechanical thrombectomy devices usually contains a fluid circuit with a vascular replica.2,8,38 The fluid circuit is filled with saline or glycerol-saline mixture and usually warmed at 37 °C. Pulsation pumps are most often used to generate the approximate physiological flow in the fluid circuit. Simplified stationary flow has also been used in some studies. The data acquisition system can be connected to the loop to measure the pressure and flow. Similar equipment has been used in other in vitro studies to investigate cerebral blood flow in the circle of Willis 39 or to analyse clot trajectories. 35
Three-dimensional transparent silicone vascular replicas, which can realistically reproduce the morphology of cerebral blood vessels and have mechanical properties close to physiology,38,40 are most widely used in in vitro experimental platforms.10,21 Some studies have the complete circle of the Willis model,21,41,42 while others studies only have the unilateral anterior circulation model.8,22 Due to the high coefficient of friction of silicone, some studies added surfactant into the test fluid10,42,43 or used lubricant coatings8,22 on the inner wall of the vascular model to reduce the friction. During thrombectomy, the interaction of the device and the thrombus can be observed through the transparent vascular model, and the restoration of flow can be verified under angiography. 41 Glass,1,24 PMMA 34 or other 3D printed materials38,41,44 have also been used to fabricate vascular replicas. Depending on the objectives of the study, some studies simplified the vascular model into straight, cone-shaped or curved tubes comprising soft or rigid materials.17,45 Recently, a test bed with a cadaveric cerebrovascular connecting to a peristaltic pump has been reported. 46
Silicone vascular models can be produced by injection moulding or 3D printing. There are many commercially available silicone vascular models with moderate cost, fine transparency, and similar mechanical properties close to vascular tissue. The rigid vascular model cannot reflect the deformation of the blood vessels, and therefore, the model has a greater degree of distortion. 3D printing is suitable for small batch production in the laboratory, but some materials are less transparent. No research has been found comparing the friction properties of several vascular model materials. For a model containing the circle of Willis, there may be more realistic pressure and flow distributions because of the inclusion of more realistic collateral circulation, while no reports have been found that compare the internal hydrodynamics of a unilateral model with that of a model containing a completed circle of Willis.
Some platforms include pressure sensors, flow sensors and data acquisition systems to monitor the flow state in the vascular replica. The pressure and flow rate in the vascular replica can be controlled in the physiological range by adjusting the pump output and flow resistance devices, such as clamps and valves installed in the fluid circuit. In some simplified situations, the reservoir is placed above the test platform and connected to the proximal side of the embolic site, creating static pressure on the clot.16,47 Although most of the in vitro experiments set up the flow and pressure in the circuit prior to the thrombectomy test, only a few papers have reported changes in pressure and flow after embolization and during mechanical thrombectomy procedures. 8 After the baseline flow and pressure are set, if the output flow rate of the pump and the resistance of the loop remain unchanged, the flow state in the loop will change when the tested vessel is occluded by clots. If the flow loop lacks reasonable collateral circulation (for example, the branch where Valve 3 is located in Figure 1A), the pressure and flow may deviate significantly from the physiological situation once the tested vessel is occluded. Deviating pressures and flow rates may lead to inaccurate test results, especially for aspiration catheters. The settings of many in vitro mechanical thrombectomy studies are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 1.
Composition of the in vitro experimental platform in our study (A); thrombin-induced clot analogue (B); unilateral anterior circulation model (C); complete circle of Willis model (Preclinic Medtech, Shanghai, China) (D); a stent retriever prototype developed by our group was tested in an in vitro circulation model (E).
Table 1.
Summary of sets of in vitro thrombectomy experiments.
| Researchers | Clots | Vascular replica | Test fluid | Pump | Flow rate | Pressure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chueh 8 | thrombin-induced, bovine blood | silicon, unilateral ICA/MCA, LSR topcoat | 60% water, 40% glycerine | piston pump | CCA: 363 ± 1.9 mL/min MCA: 132 ± 1.4 mL/min | MCA pressure gradient: 21 ± 0.7 mmHg |
| Chueh 48, 49 | thrombin-induced, bovine blood human blood | silicon, unilateral, with leptomeningeal collaterals and PComA | saline | peristaltic pump | MCA: 131.6 ± 3.2 mL/min PcomA: 23.3 ± 9.4 mL/min ACA: 67 ± 5.1 mL/min |
physiologically representative pressure gradient |
| Chueh 50 | thrombin-induced, bovine blood, human blood | silicon, unilateral, with leptomeningeal collaterals and PComA | saline | peristaltic roller pump | CCA: 340 ± 15.1 mL/min MCA: 131 ± 2.7 mL/min PcomA: 11.4 ± 2.7 mL/min |
proximal MCA: 73.7 ± 5.2 mmHg MCA pressure gradient 5.6 ± 4.2 mmHg |
| Arslanian 51 | thrombin-induced, bovine blood, fibrinogen and calcium-phosphate | silicone, complete circle of Willis | saline | peristaltic roller pump | / | / |
| Madjidyar 22 | Chandler loop | silicon, unilateral vascular, coated with slippery liquid (Elastrat Sarl) | 60% water, 40% glycerine, 37 °C | programmable piston pump, 60 bpm | velocity 1.2 m/s | pressure 140/80 mmHg |
| Madjidyar 19, 52 | Chandler loop, fibrin-rich clot | silicon, unilateral vascular, coated with propranolol-based fluid (Elastrat Sarl) | 60% saline, 40% glycerine, 37 °C | pulse 60/min | velocity 100 cm/s | mean pressure 100 mmHg |
| Machi 12 | white ‘stiff’ thrombi, red ‘soft’ thrombi | rigid 3D printed unilateral anterior circulation | saline, 37 °C | / | / | / |
| Machi 44 | organized clot human blood | 3D printed, translucent photosensitive resin | water, 37 °C | gear pump | / | / |
| Kaneko 10 | thrombin-induced, porcine blood | silicon, unilateral anterior circulation, | 60% saline, 40% glycerine, detergent, 37 °C | perfusion pump | ICA: 240 mL/min, ECA: 160 mL/min |
hydrostatic pressure, 100–126 mmHg |
| Fennel 15 | fibrin-rich clot, ovine blood | near complete circle of Willis circulation | water, 37 °C | pulsatile pump | full model: 590 mL/min | / |
| Wiesmann 45 | / | silicone, straight, curved, and curved cone-shaped tubes | saline, iodinate contrast agent, 22 °C | / | / | / |
| Girdhar 43 | fibrin-rich, porcine blood, thrombin induced | silicone | water, 0.2% v/v soap, 37 ± 2 °C | pulsatile pump, 60 bpm | 300 ± 50 mL/min | systolic 150 ± 10 mmHg diastolic 70 ± 10 mmHg |
| Mokin 41, 53, 54 | thrombin-induced, swine blood | 3D printed, TangoPlus material, near-complete circle of Willis | 60% water, 40% glycerine, 37 °C | pulsatile pump | / | / |
| Lally 47 | naturally clotted, ovine blood | glass, pinch point | water containing haematoxylin particles | fluid reservoir 122 cm above the model | / | mean arterial pressure 90 mmHg |
| Nogueira 55 Fitzgerald 42 | red-blood cell-rich, mixed, fibrin/platelet-rich | 3D printed, circle of Willis | 1:4 glycerol:water, surfactant, 37 °C | peristaltic pump, 72 bpm | 750 ml/min | average pressure gradient ICA 89 mmHg, M1 112 mmHg |
| Soize 13 | red-blood-cell-rich, fibrin-rich, hybrid, ovine blood | silicone, unilateral anterior circulation (Elastrat), posterior flow | saline solution, 37 °C | pulsatile pump | 430 ml/min | 110/60 mmHg |
| Rizvi 16 | RBC-rich, fibrin-rich, mixed, rabbit blood | glass model, pinch-point | water | fluid reservoir 122 cm above the model | / | mean arterial pressure 90 mmHg |
| Ohshima 56 | white hard clot, red soft clot, swine blood | silicone, unilateral anterior circulation | saline, 37 °C | / | main route: 50 cm/s collateral route: 10 cm/s | / |
| Luraghi 17 | ca 20% RBC | glass U-bent vessel, silicon funnel-shaped vessel, 3D-printed silicone circle of Willis | saline 37 °C | stationary flow | / | / |
| Wenger 24 | Chandler loop, porcine blood | glass model | water 37 °C | pulsatile pump, 50 bpm | medium flow 125 mL/min | pulsatile pressure 110–150 mmHg |
| Bernava 34 | mixtures of guar, borax and water | carved PMMA model | / | / | / | / |
| Reddy 38 | elastic emboli, fragment-prone emboli | 3D-printed clear resin, glass, silicone, unilateral anterior circulation | saline solution, replicator fluid | syringe pump, 60 bpm | ICA: 265 ± 62 ml/min MCA: 121 ± 28 ml/min |
calibrated to clinical records |
| Liu 1 | mixing plasma and red blood cells 9:1 | glass, unilateral anterior circulation | / | peristaltic pump | physiological flow | physiological pressure |
| Fargen 57 | surrogate material | silicone, unilateral anterior circulation (Elastrat) | saline | dual output solenoid diaphragm pump | 120 mL/min | 120/80 mm Hg |
| Johnson 21 | calcified cerebral emboli | silicone, complete circle of Willis (Elastrat Sàrl) | saline, 37 °C | continuous flow pump | full model: 680 ± 50 ml/min ICA: 287 ± 35 mL/min |
/ |
Applications in testing thrombectomy devices
The in vitro model can be used to evaluate the performance of thrombectomy devices, such as recanalization rate and time, number of recanalization manoeuvres, distal embolization22,48,56 and first pass success rate. 43 Soft and hard clots 12 and vascular models with various tortuosities10,58 can be used to assess the performance of thrombectomy devices in a variety of situations. For stent retrievers, in addition to the items mentioned above, in vitro models can also test wall apposition12,23 and tensile force.12,23 Some new segmented, 10 and longer 43 stent retrievers designed for capturing hard clots 15 are being tested through in vitro models. For aspiration catheters, in vitro models have been used to evaluate the effect of aspiration distance,16,47 aspiration angle, 34 catheter diameter 55 and cyclical aspiration.33,51,59 The thrombectomy test of the combined use of stent retrievers and aspiration catheters22,41 or the combined use of balloon guide catheters and thrombectomy devices52,56 in vascular replicas has also been reported. Some studies compared the recanalization rate of stent retrievers and aspiration catheters through in vitro platforms 53 and the difference in effectiveness of these two types of devices for different types of clots.19,20
The in vitro experimental model provides a convenient method for testing new devices and new technologies emerging in the neurointervention field. A braided mesh device designed to protect distal embolization lead by clot fragments was tested in in vitro models.49,54,57 Some large bare or funnel-shaped catheters 60 also showed good results in an in vitro environment. In vitro models are suitable tools for validating the performance of intracranial neurovascular intervention robotic systems. 61 In a preclinical study, a magnetically manipulated robotic neurointerventional platform assisted mechanical thrombectomy in an in vitro cerebral vascular phantom. 62 In terms of thrombectomy methods, Wiesmanns et al. 45 used an in vitro model to evaluate the role of active pushing techniques on the effectiveness of recanalization. Fast stent retrieval was found to increase the recanalization rate in an in vitro flow model. 13
Advantages of in vitro models
Study of distal embolization
Distal embolism caused by dislodged clot fragments is a complication of mechanical thrombectomy and may affect the outcome of the treatment. One of the advantages of in vitro models is the ability to collect fluid in the circulating line, which can be used to evaluate the size and the number of thrombus fragments during thrombectomy and to reflect the extent of distal embolism. Using a particle size analyser based on the Coulter principle, Chueh et al. analysed the size and number of emboli caused by several different devices and different treatments.8,48–51, 63 Because the vascular model used by Mokin 41 contained smaller diameter vessels, their study used angiography and TICI scores to assess the degree of recanalization. A filter deployed at the distal end of the vessel replica can also be used to collect emboli.42,52,64
Investigating the interaction of devices and clots
Studying the interaction between the stent retriever and the thrombus is important for the optimal design of a stent retriever. Despite the increased radiopaque techniques to some stent retrievers, it is difficult to observe the deformation of the stent retriever and the thrombus under angiography. The in vitro experimental platform allows visualization of stent–thrombus interactions when using transparent vessel models. Madjidyar et al. 22 observed that the thrombus was compressed aside by the stent retriever and that the thrombus rolled distally during retrieval. Machi et al. 12 found that for large volumes of fibrin-rich thrombi, the stent retriever may not be able to expand, resulting in failure to recanalize. Liu et al. 1 observed the interaction of the device with clots in the ADAPT and CAPTIVE techniques in an in vitro model.
The interaction of a stent with a thrombus can be further observed by 3D image reconstruction. The deformation of the stent retriever and thrombi in a straight silicone tube was detected by flat panel computed tomography, showing a cushion-like bulging thrombus into the stent lumen. 65 Marel et al. 66 proposed the concept of clot integration factor and observed the internal volume of soft and hard thrombi embedded in the stent by high-resolution cone beam CT. Micro computed tomography is also used to evaluate strut indentation. 18
Verification of simulation models
Mechanical thrombectomy procedures can be virtually simulated by finite element analysis. The deformation and stress of devices, clots and vessels can be well predicted in the simulation. Finite element analysis has potential in the development of novel thrombectomy devices and the evaluation of new surgical methods. Using 3D reconstruction technology and 3D printing technology, the morphology of the in vitro vascular model and the in silico vascular model are consistent, which is favourable for the validation of the simulation model. Luraghi et al. 17 established a simulation process for stent retriever thrombectomy based on the finite element method and performed in vitro thrombectomy tests and simulation thrombectomy tests under three conditions: glass U-shaped tube, silicone funnel-shaped tube, and 3D printed silicone vessel. The results of the in vitro tests were found to be consistent with the simulation results, and the accuracy and reliability of the simulation model were confirmed. Computational fluid dynamics can be used for fluid analysis in aspiration. Lally et al. 47 verified the flow direction of fluid at the catheter tip in the simulation using an in vitro model.
Limitations and future prospects
There are still some limitations in the in vitro model for mechanical thrombectomy. First, the vascular replica is still far from the real cerebral vasculature in detail. If there is a lack of lubrication, the silicone vascular model has a larger coefficient of friction. The rigid vascular model, on the other hand, does not reflect vascular traction deformation during thrombectomy. Vascular injury cannot be assessed using in vitro models, and in vivo studies are needed. Most of the current vascular models only extend to the M2 segment, and some of the studied vascular models can reach the M4 segment. 41 However, the level of detail of the models is still not comparable with that of real cerebral vessels. Second, although the viscosity of the simulated fluid can be set to approximate that of blood, the in vitro model cannot simulate the natural generation and degradation of thrombi and the action of thrombolytic agents due to the lack of active substances. Third, many studies did not check the pressure and flow rate in the circuit during thrombectomy tests, which may lead to inaccurate test results if the pressure and flow rate in the circuit are too different from the physiological situation. In general, there is still room for improvement in many aspects of the in vitro model.
The in vitro models for thrombectomy device testing may be integrated with more novel technologies in the future. Some features, such as atherosclerosis or calcified plaque models, may be added into the vascular models. Tissue engineering and 3D bioprinting technology have made it possible to fabricate bioactive artificial blood vessel models. Microchannel networks fabricated with photolithography techniques have been used in microfluidic oxygenators, and they have the potential to be applied to vascular models to simulate distal cerebral vessels with smaller diameters or perforating arteries. Future in vitro models may integrate more microsensors in the flow circuit, for example, for pressure and temperature monitoring. In the future, there may also be new approaches to preparing artificial clots that more closely resemble the in vivo clots in terms of tissue composition and mechanical properties.
Conclusion
The in vitro experimental model has the advantages of simplicity and intuitiveness and is widely used in the study of interventional mechanical thrombectomy. An in vitro model can be used to evaluate stent retrievers, aspiration catheters and some new thrombectomy devices and methods. The in vitro experimental model also has the unique role of being able to study the number of emboli fragments, evaluate the interaction between the device and the thrombus, and validate the simulation model. Although the current in vitro model has some limitations, the in vitro model may play a more important role in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke with the development of experimental technology.
Footnotes
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
ORCID iD: Ronghui Liu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1550-8849
References
- 1.Liu Y, Zheng Y, Reddy AS, et al. Analysis of human emboli and thrombectomy forces in large-vessel occlusion stroke. J Neurosurg 2020; 134: 893–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chueh J-Y, Kuhn AL, Wakhloo AK, et al. Experimental models of vascular occlusions for evaluation of thrombectomy devices. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2013; 4: 309–322. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jahan R. Solitaire flow-restoration device for treatment of acute ischemic stroke: safety and recanalization efficacy study in a swine vessel occlusion model. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology 2010; 31: 1938–1943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhou G, Li MH, Lu HT, et al. No inferiority of tonbridge thrombectomy device for acute thrombus retrial compared with solitaire device: an experimental evaluation with a canine distal external carotid-maxillary artery occlusion model. J Neurointerv Surg 2018; 10: 1085–1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Arai D, Ishii A, Chihara H, et al. Histological examination of vascular damage caused by stent retriever thrombectomy devices. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8: 992–995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liebig T, Reinartz J, Hannes R, et al. Comparative in vitro study of five mechanical embolectomy systems: effectiveness of clot removal and risk of distal embolization. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 43–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fitzgerald ST, Liu Y, Dai D, et al. Novel human acute ischemic stroke blood clot analogs for in vitro thrombectomy testing. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology 2021; 42: 1250–1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chueh JY, Wakhloo AK, Gounis MJ. Effectiveness of mechanical endovascular thrombectomy in a model system of cerebrovascular occlusion. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology 2012; 33: 1998–2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Duffy S, Farrell M, McArdle K, et al. Novel methodology to replicate clot analogs with diverse composition in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 486–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kaneko N, Komuro Y, Yokota H, et al. Stent retrievers with segmented design improve the efficacy of thrombectomy in tortuous vessels. J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11: 119–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gralla J, Schroth G, Remonda L, et al. A dedicated animal model for mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2006; 27: 1357–1361. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Machi P, Jourdan F, Ambard D, et al. Experimental evaluation of stent retrievers’ mechanical properties and effectiveness. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 257–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Soize S, Pierot L, Mirza M, et al. Fast stent retrieval improves recanalization rates of thrombectomy: experimental study on different thrombi. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology 2020; 41: 1049–1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Malone F, McCarthy E, Delassus P, et al. The mechanical characterisation of bovine embolus analogues under Various loading conditions. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2018; 9: 489–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fennell VS, Setlur Nagesh SV, Meess KM, et al. What to do about fibrin rich ‘tough clots’? Comparing the solitaire stent retriever with a novel geometric clot extractor in an in vitro stroke model. J Neurointerv Surg 2018; 10: 907–910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rizvi A, Fitzgerald ST, Carlson KD, et al. In vitro remote aspiration embolectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Interv Neurol 2020; 8: 20–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Luraghi G, Rodriguez Matas JF, Dubini G, et al. Applicability assessment of a stent-retriever thrombectomy finite-element model. Interface Focus 2021; 11: 20190123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Weafer FM, Duffy S, Machado I, et al. Characterization of strut indentation during mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke clot analogs. J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11: 891–897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Madjidyar J, Vidal LP, Larsen N, et al. Influence of thrombus composition on thrombectomy: ADAPT vs. Balloon guide catheter and stent retriever in a flow model. RoFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 2020; 192: 257–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Johnson S, Chueh J, Gounis MJ, et al. Mechanical behavior of in vitro blood clots and the implications for acute ischemic stroke treatment. J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 12: 853–857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Johnson S, McCarthy R, Fahy B, et al. Development of an in vitro model of calcified cerebral emboli in acute ischemic stroke for mechanical thrombectomy evaluation. J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 12: 1002–1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Madjidyar J, Hermes J, Freitag-Wolf S, et al. Stent-thrombus interaction and the influence of aspiration on mechanical thrombectomy: evaluation of different stent retrievers in a circulation model. Neuroradiology 2015; 57: 791–797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Larsen N, Oberbeck K, Lima de Miranda R, et al. Comparison of efficacy, embolism rate and safety of thrombectomy with stent retrievers in an anterior circulation stroke model. RoFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 2018; 190: 1053–1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wenger K, Nagl F, Wagner M, et al. Improvement of stent retriever design and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in a flow model. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 36: 192–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Berndt M, Prothmann S, Maegerlein C, et al. Artificial stroke clots: how wide is the gap to the real world? World Neurosurg 2018; 110: e90–e99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Preut A, Laughlin M, Jensen H, et al. Novel method for emboli analog formation towards improved stroke retrieval devices. J Biomech 2018; 80: 121–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shao Q, Zhu L, Li T, et al. New method of thrombus preparation using a fluid model for evaluation of thrombectomy devices in a swine model. Thromb Res 2014; 134: 1087–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yuki I, Kan I, Vinters HV, et al. The impact of thromboemboli histology on the performance of a mechanical thrombectomy device. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology 2012; 33: 643–648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Johnson S, McCarthy R, Gilvarry M, et al. Investigating the mechanical behavior of clot analogues through experimental and computational analysis. Ann Biomed Eng 2021; 49: 420–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu Y, Reddy AS, Cockrum J, et al. Standardized fabrication method of human-derived emboli with histologic and mechanical quantification for stroke research. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases :the Official Journal of National Stroke Association 2020; 29: 105205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chueh JY, Wakhloo AK, Hendricks GH, et al. Mechanical characterization of thromboemboli in acute ischemic stroke and laboratory embolus analogs. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology 2011; 32: 1237–1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gunning GM, McArdle K, Mirza M, et al. Clot friction variation with fibrin content; implications for resistance to thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2018; 10: 34–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Simon S, Grey CP, Massenzo T, et al. Exploring the efficacy of cyclic vs static aspiration in a cerebral thrombectomy model: an initial proof of concept study. J Neurointerv Surg 2014; 6: 677–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bernava G, Rosi A, Boto J, et al. Experimental evaluation of direct thromboaspiration efficacy according to the angle of interaction between the aspiration catheter and the clot. J Neurointerv Surg 2021; 13: 1152–1156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fahy P, Malone F, McCarthy E, et al. An in vitro evaluation of emboli trajectories within a three-dimensional physical model of the circle of willis under cerebral blood flow conditions. Ann Biomed Eng 2015; 43: 2265–2278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ulm AJ, Khachatryan T, Grigorian A, et al. Preclinical evaluation of the NeVaTM stent retriever: safety and efficacy in the swine thrombectomy model. Interv Neurol 2018; 7: 205–217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Merritt W, Holter AM, Beahm S, et al. Quantifying the mechanical and histological properties of thrombus analog made from human blood for the creation of synthetic thrombus for thrombectomy device testing. J Neurointerv Surg 2018; 10: 1168–1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Reddy AS, Liu Y, Cockrum J, et al. Construction of a comprehensive endovascular test bed for research and device development in mechanical thrombectomy in stroke. J Neurosurg 2020; 134: 1190–1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yu H, Huang GP, Ludwig BR, et al. An in-vitro flow study using an artificial circle of willis model for validation of an existing one-dimensional numerical model. Ann Biomed Eng 2019; 47: 1023–1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chueh JY, Wakhloo AK, Gounis MJ. Neurovascular modeling: small-batch manufacturing of silicone vascular replicas. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology 2009; 30: 1159–1164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mokin M, Ionita CN, Setlur Nagesh SV, et al. Primary stentriever versus combined stentriever plus aspiration thrombectomy approaches: in vitro stroke model comparison. J Neurointerv Surg 2015; 7: 453–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fitzgerald S, Ryan D, Thornton J, et al. Preclinical evaluation of millipede 088 intracranial aspiration catheter in cadaver and in vitro thrombectomy models. J Neurointerv Surg 2021; 13: 447–452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Girdhar G, Epstein E, Nguyen K, et al. Longer 6-mm diameter stent retrievers are effective for achieving higher first pass success with fibrin-rich clots. Interv Neurol 2020; 8: 187–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Machi P, Ulm AJ, Bernava G, et al. Experimental evaluation of the NeVa thrombectomy device a novel stent retriever conceived to improve efficacy of organized clot removal. Journal of Neuroradiology=Journal de Neuroradiologie 2019; 46: 163–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wiesmann M, Brockmann MA, Heringer S, et al. Active push deployment technique improves stent/vessel-wall interaction in endovascular treatment of acute stroke with stent retrievers. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 253–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gebrezgiabhier D, Liu Y, Reddy AS, et al. A human brain test bed for research in large vessel occlusion stroke. J Neurosurg 2021; 135: 1072–1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lally F, Soorani M, Woo T, et al. In vitro experiments of cerebral blood flow during aspiration thrombectomy: potential effects on cerebral perfusion pressure and collateral flow. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8: 969–972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chueh J-Y, Puri AS, Wakhloo AK, et al. Risk of distal embolization with stent retriever thrombectomy and ADAPT. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8: 197–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chueh JY, Puri AS, Gounis MJ. An in vitro evaluation of distal emboli following Lazarus cover-assisted stent retriever thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 183–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chueh JY, Kuhn AL, Puri AS, et al. Reduction in distal emboli with proximal flow control during mechanical thrombectomy: a quantitative in vitro study. Stroke 2013; 44: 1396–1401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Arslanian RA, Marosfoi M, Caroff J, et al. Complete clot ingestion with cyclical ADAPT increases first-pass recanalization and reduces distal embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11: 931–936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Madjidyar J, Nerkada L, Larsen N, et al. Choosing an effective and safe direct aspiration setup for tortuous anatomy in acute ischemic stroke: in vitro study in a physiological flow model. RoFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 2021; 193: 544–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mokin M, Setlur Nagesh SV, Ionita CN, et al. Comparison of modern stroke thrombectomy approaches using an in vitro cerebrovascular occlusion model. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology 2015; 36: 547–551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mokin M, Setlur Nagesh SV, Ionita CN, et al. Stent retriever thrombectomy with the cover accessory device versus proximal protection with a balloon guide catheter: in vitro stroke model comparison. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8: 413–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nogueira RG, Ryan D, Mullins L, et al. Maximizing the catheter-to-vessel size optimizes distal flow control resulting in improved revascularization in vitro for aspiration thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2022; 14: 184–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ohshima T, Miyachi S. Experimental evaluation of the risk of distal embolization during endovascular clot retrieval using Various techniques. Asian J Neurosurg 2021; 16: 84–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Fargen KM, Mocco J, Gobin YP. The Lazarus funnel: a blinded prospective randomized in vitro trial of a novel CE-marked thrombectomy assist device. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8: 66–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hopf-Jensen S, Marques J, Lehrke S, et al. Influence of vessel morphology and variations on technical and clinical success in mechanical thrombectomy: -in vivo and in vitro analyses. Journal of Neuroradiology = Journal de Neuroradiologie 2019; 46: 319–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Good BC, Costanzo F, Simon SD, et al. Hydrodynamics in acute ischemic stroke catheters under static and cyclic aspiration conditions. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2020; 11: 689–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tanyildizi Y, Payne E, Gerber T, et al. In vitro testing of a funnel-shaped tip catheter model to decrease clot migration during mechanical thrombectomy. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Britz GW, Tomas J, Lumsden A. Feasibility of robotic-assisted neurovascular interventions: initial experience in flow model and porcine model. Neurosurgery 2020; 86: 309–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kim Y, Genevriere E, Harker P, et al. Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation. Science Robotics 2022; 7: eabg9907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Caroff J, King RM, Arslanian R, et al. Microcatheter navigation through the clot: does size matter? J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11: 271–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rusch R, Trentmann J, Hummitzsch L, et al. Feasibility of a circulation model for the assessment of endovascular recanalization procedures and periprocedural thromboembolism in-vitro. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 17356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wenger KJ, Berkefeld J, Wagner M. Flat panel detector computed tomography for the interaction between contrast-enhanced thrombi and stent retrievers in stroke therapy: a pilot study. Clin Neuroradiol 2014; 24: 251–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.van der Marel K, Chueh JY, Brooks OW, et al. Quantitative assessment of device-clot interaction for stent retriever thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8: 1278–1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

