Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 13;14(2):e6524. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2023.6524

Table 3.

Overview of Health Economic Perspective, Results, and Quality

Perspective of analysis Telehealth cheaper Telehealth more expensive
Study CHEERS Study CHEERS
Health Service - Funder (public) Beard (Beard et al., 2017) 12 Hollinghurst (Hollinghurst et al., 2013)*^ 20
Bettger (Bettger et al., 2020)
Kloek (Kloeketal., 2018)*^ 19
Mallett (Mallett et al., 2014)* 11
Pastora-Bemal (Pastora-Bemal, Martín-Valero, & Barón-López,2018) 16
Tousignant (Tousignant et al., 2015)# 21
Zachwieja (Zachwieja et al., 2020) 19
Health Service - Funder (private) Horton (Horton etal., 2021) 14 Nil
Health Service - Provider (public) Cottrell (Cottrell et al., 2019)* 19
Societal Kloek (Kloek et al., 2018)*^ 21
Patient Fatoye (Fatoye et al., 2020)^ 16
*

Findings in favour of telehealth intervention but significance of cost comparison not reported or not achieved

^

CUA presented supporting cost-effectiveness of telehealth

#

Comparator home visits <30km travel distance not significantly cheaper