Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1998 Aug;64(8):3063–3065. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.8.3063-3065.1998

Heat Shock Response in the Thermophilic Enteric Yeast Arxiozyma telluris

Michelle L Deegenaars 1, Kenneth Watson 1,*
PMCID: PMC106816  PMID: 9687474

Abstract

Heat stress tolerance was examined in the thermophilic enteric yeast Arxiozyma telluris. Heat shock acquisition of thermotolerance and synthesis of heat shock proteins hsp 104, hsp 90, hsp 70, and hsp 60 were induced by a mild heat shock at temperatures from 35 to 40°C for 30 min. The results demonstrate that a yeast which occupies a specialized ecological niche exhibits a typical heat shock response.


Temperature is one of the most important parameters affecting the growth and survival of microorganisms (6, 24). Most microorganisms are mesophiles and occupy temperature niches that are not regarded as extreme. Psychrophilic microbes, including psychrophilic yeasts (24), are capable of growth at temperatures below 0°C and have a maximum growth temperature of 20°C (15). It has been proposed that a thermophilic yeast should be defined as a yeast which has a minimum temperature for growth of 20°C and no restriction on the maximum temperature for growth (24). If this definition is used, all of the species in this category are enteric yeasts isolated from digestive tracts of various animals (20). These yeasts, which have growth temperature limits between 20 and 46°C (20, 26), include the respiratory-deficient organisms Candida slooffii and Torulopsis pintolopesii and the respiratory-competent organisms Saccharomyces telluris and Torulopsis bovina. All of these yeasts have been reclassified as Arxiozyma telluris (4, 22), are facultative anaerobes (27), and either occur as respiratory-deficient organisms or are capable of giving rise to stable respiratory-deficient mutants either spontaneously or by ethidium bromide induction (2, 26).

The heat shock response, whereby exposure to a mild, nonlethal heat shock renders cells resistant to a subsequent challenge at a higher, normally lethal temperature, appears to be a universal response in all organisms (5, 9, 19). In the mesophilic yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae a mild heat shock at 37°C induces tolerance to a normally lethal temperature, generally 48 to 55°C. Thermotolerant cells synthesize the disaccharide trehalose (3, 7) and a specific set of proteins, termed the heat shock proteins (9, 18, 25). In heat-stressed yeasts, trehalose appears to maintain the structure and integrity of cell membranes and proteins (7, 18).

In this paper we describe the heat shock response of two strains of the thermophilic enteric yeast A. telluris and compare this response to the response reported previously for the mesophilic yeast S. cerevisiae.

Yeast strains and culture conditions.

A. telluris CBS 1787 (respiratory deficient) and CBS 2760 (respiratory competent) were used in this study. Cultures were grown at 35°C on a rotary shaker (180 rpm) in YEP medium [0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% bacteriological peptone, 0.3% (NH4)2SO4, 0.3% KH2PO4, 2% glucose]. Experimental cultures were grown to optical densities at 600 nm of 0.2 to 0.4, corresponding to logarithmic-phase cells at concentrations of approximately 2 × 106 to 6 × 106 cells ml−1. All experiments were repeated a minimum of three times and produced consistent results.

Stress tolerance assays.

Preliminary experiments were undertaken to determine the optimal temperatures required to give appropriate stress tolerance kinetics for a heat shock response. Intrinsic thermotolerance was measured by rapidly heating cells grown at 35 to 47°C in a 70°C water bath and transferring them to a 47°C oscillating water bath for the duration of the 60-min time course. Induced thermotolerance was measured by exposing cultures to a 30-min 40°C heat shock prior to heat stress at 47°C. Subsamples (0.5 ml) were taken at various times and diluted in YEP medium. Duplicate YEP agar spread plates were prepared and incubated at 35°C for 1 to 2 days. Thermotolerance was assessed by determining the percentage of CFU after heat treatment compared to the CFU in an unstressed control (100% survivors).

Trehalose determination.

Trehalose was extracted in triplicate from 80 ml (5 to 7 mg [dry weight] of washed cells. Control and heat-shocked cells were extracted with 0.5 M trichloroacetic acid at 4°C, and the trehalose concentrations were estimated by a modified anthrone method (8).

[35S]methionine labelling, protein extraction, and electrophoresis.

Prior to [35S]methionine labelling, 40 ml of culture was washed and resuspended in 2 ml of YNB medium (0.67% yeast nitrogen base, 0.3% KH2PO4, 2% glucose) without amino acids. [35S]methionine (100 μCi; specific activity, 1,150 Ci mmol−1) was added to control and heat shock samples, and the preparations were incubated at the appropriate temperatures for 30 min. Cells were pelleted and protein was extracted as previously described (14). Protein concentrations were determined by using a Coomassie blue microassay procedure (Pierce). Proteins (10 μg) and low-range molecular weight standards (Bio-Rad) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis by using a 10% polyacrylamide separating gel and a 4% polyacrylamide stacking gel. The gels were silver stained, dried, and exposed to Hyperfilm-MP (Amersham) at −70°C for 5 to 7 days before they were developed.

Western immunoblot analysis.

Following extraction and electrophoresis as described above, proteins were transferred to Hybond-C super nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham). Western immunoblotting was carried out by using an Amersham ECL Western blot detection kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The final membranes, washes prior to detection were modified as follows: three washes (5 min each in phosphate-buffered saline–0.3% Tween 20, followed by three washes (5 min each in phosphate-buffered saline–0.1% Tween 20. Anti-hsp 104 polyclonal antibody (Affinity BioReagents), anti-hsp 90 monoclonal antibody (a kind gift from P. Piper, University College London), anti-hsp 70 monoclonal antibody (Affinity BioReagents), and anti-hsp 60 monoclonal antibody (StressGen) were used at dilutions of 1:1,000, 1:750, 1:5,000, and 1:1,000, respectively. The appropriate secondary antibody was used at a dilution of 1:1,000. Membranes were exposed to Hyperfilm-MP for times ranging from a few seconds to a few minutes before they were developed.

Intrinsic thermotolerance and induced thermotolerance.

Intrinsic thermotolerance and induced thermotolerance to a 47°C heat stress over a 60-min time course were measured in respiratory-competent strain 2760 and respiratory-deficient strain 1787 of A. telluris. A 40°C heat shock for 30 min prior to a 47°C heat stress conferred tolerance to both strains, and the levels of viability for the 60-min experiment were close to 100% (Fig. 1). The levels of induction for intrinsic thermotolerance and induced thermotolerance were similar in both strains.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Intrinsic thermotolerance and induced thermotolerance in mid-logarithmic-phase cultures of A. telluris 2760 (respiratory competent) (circles) and A. telluris 1787 (respiratory-deficient) (triangles). Intrinsic tolerance (○ and ▿) was measured by transferring cells directly to 47°C. Induced thermotolerance was monitored at 47°C following a 40°C heat shock for 30 min (• and ▾). Levels of thermotolerance are expressed as percentages of survivors after the appropriate treatment compared with the number of survivors in a 35°C control sample.

Trehalose.

A 40°C heat shock for 30 min resulted in marked increases in trehalose accumulation; the amounts of trehalose increased approximately 12- and 17-fold in strains 2760 and 1787, respectively. The absolute levels of trehalose were less for both control and heat shock samples in strain 1787 (control, 0.63% [wt/vol]; heat shock, 10.7% [wt/vol]) than in strain 2760 (control, 1.2% [wt/vol]; heat shock, 13.9% [wt/vol]).

Stress proteins.

As shown by [35S]methionine-labelled de novo protein synthesis, a 40°C heat shock for 30 min induced synthesis of proteins whose molecular masses corresponded to the molecular masses of hsp 104, hsp 90, and members of the hsp 70 family in both strain 2760 and strain 1787 (Fig. 2). Furthermore, a ca. 35-kDa heat shock-inducible protein was identified in both strains (Fig. 2).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis autoradiogram of [35S]methionine-labelled protein extracts from A. telluris 2760 (respiratory competent) (a) and A. telluris 1787 (respiratory deficient) (b). The conditions used were as follows: 35°C for the control (lanes 1 and 3) and 40°C for the heat shock (lanes 2 and 4). The arrows indicate new or increased heat shock protein synthesis. The positions of molecular mass standards are indicated on the left and right.

Western immunoblot analysis (Fig. 3) performed with S. cerevisiae anti-hsp 104, anti-hsp 90, anti-hsp 70 (which cross-reacts with hsp 70 subfamily A), and anti-hsp 60 antibodies confirmed the identities of the heat shock proteins observed when [35S]methionine labelling was used (Fig. 2). Overall, the constitutive heat shock protein levels were greater in strain 2760 than in strain 1787. In addition, two protein bands were recognized by the anti-hsp 90 antibody; these bands corresponded to the S. cerevisiae hsp 90 proteins, hsc 82 (cognate, lower band), and hsp 82 (upper band).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

Western blot analysis of A. telluris 2760 (respiratory competent) (a) and A. telluris 1787 (respiratory deficient) (b). Proteins from the 35°C control treatment (lanes 1 and 3) and the 40°C heat shock treatment (lanes 2 and 4) were probed with anti-hsp 104 (1:1,000), anti-hsp 90 (1:750), anti-hsp 70 (1:5,000), and anti-hsp 60 (1:1,000).

Conclusions.

The organisms which we examined are found in the digestive tracts of warm-blooded domestic and wild animals and are obligate or facultative saprophytes, although there is a report of isolation of A. telluris from soil (reviewed in reference 20). Despite their relatively narrow temperature range for growth, these organisms were capable of a heat shock response similar to that of S. cerevisiae. Key heat shock proteins with molecular masses of 104, 90, 70, and 60 kDa, as well as the disaccharide trehalose, were synthesized upon mild heat shock. In addition, a ca. 35-kDa heat shock-inducible protein, which may correspond to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (17), was prominent in the enteric yeast.

A 5°C increase in temperature above the optimal growth temperature (35°C) was sufficient to induce the heat shock response. This may reflect the relatively narrow growth temperature range for the yeasts used or the fact that eukaryotic thermophilic microorganisms can mount a heat shock response in response to a small temperature upshift. In Thermomyces langulinosus, a thermophilic eukaryotic fungus, a 5°C temperature upshift induces thermotolerance (21). Induction of trehalose accumulation is closely correlated with induced thermotolerance in yeasts (1, 3, 7) and filamentous fungi (16), and in the present study we extended these observations to include thermophilic enteric yeasts. As observed in S. cerevisiae (10, 28, 29), we found no marked difference in the heat shock protein profiles or thermotolerance between the respiratory-competent and respiratory-deficient strains of A. telluris.

In some respects the thermophilic enteric yeasts resemble the human fungal pathogens Candida albicans and Histoplasma capsulatum. The similarities include warm-blooded host habitats and the ability to undergo temperature- and environment-dependent morphological changes (20). In recent years there has been much research and speculation concerning the potential role of heat shock proteins in the pathogenesis and morphogenesis of these important opportunistic human pathogens. There is compelling evidence, for example, that heat shock proteins associated with these pathogens induce cellular immune responses in animal and human hosts (1113). Moreover, it is now well-established that in certain microbial diseases heat shock proteins, such as GroEL (hsp 60) and DnaK (hsp 70), are key immunodominant antigens (23). Although the thermophilic enteric yeasts have not been reported to be human pathogens, we speculate that heat shock proteins play a similar role in host-parasite interactions with these yeasts. The present study demonstrates that the thermophilic enteric yeasts, which occupy a specialized ecological niche, exhibit a typical heat shock response. This observation further attests to the ubiquitous nature and fundamental importance of the heat shock response in all organisms.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a University of New England research scholarship (to M.L.D.) and by internal research grants from the University of New England.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Argüelles J C. Thermotolerance and trehalose accumulation induced by heat shock in yeast cells of Candida albicans. FEMS Lett. 1997;146:65–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10172.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arthur H, Watson K, McArthur C R, Clark-Walker G D. Naturally occurring respiratory-deficient Candida slooffii strains resemble petite mutants. Nature. 1978;271:750–752. doi: 10.1038/271750a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Attfield P V. Trehalose accumulates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during exposure to agents that induce the heat shock response. FEBS Lett. 1987;225:259–263. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(87)81170-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barnett J A, Payne R W, Yarrow D. Yeasts: characteristics and identification. 2nd ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 86. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Craig E A, Gambill B D, Nelson J. Heat shock proteins: molecular chaperones of protein biogenesis. Microbiol Rev. 1993;57:402–414. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.2.402-414.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Herbert R A. A perspective on the biotechnological potential of extremophiles. Trends Biotechnol. 1992;10:395–402. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(92)90282-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hottiger T, Boller T, Wiemken A. Correlation of trehalose content and heat resistance in yeast mutants altered in the RAS/adenylate cyclase pathway: is trehalose a thermoprotectant? FEBS Lett. 1989;255:431–434. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(89)81139-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lewis J G, Learmonth R P, Watson K. The role of growth phase and ethanol in freeze-thaw stress resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:1065–1071. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.4.1065-1071.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lindquist S, Craig E A. The heat shock proteins. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;55:1151–1191. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.003215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lindquist S, DiDomenico B, Bugaisky G, Kurtz S, Sonoda S. Regulation of the heat-shock response in Drosophila and yeast. In: Schlesinger M J, Ashburner M, Tissieres A, editors. Heat shock: from bacteria to man. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1982. pp. 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Maresca B, Kobayashi G S. Heat shock proteins in fungal infections. In: van Eden W, Young D B, editors. Stress proteins in medicine. New York, N.Y: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1996. pp. 287–299. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Matthews R. Hsps in candidiasis. In: Mathews R, Burnie J P, editors. Heat shock proteins in fungal infections. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1995. pp. 1–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Matthews R, Burnie J P, editors. Heat shock proteins in fungal infections. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McAlister L, Strausberg S, Kulaga A, Finkelstein D B. Altered patterns of protein synthesis induced by heat shock of yeast. Curr Genet. 1979;1:63–74. doi: 10.1007/BF00413307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Morita R Y. Psychrophilic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1975;39:144–167. doi: 10.1128/br.39.2.144-167.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Neves M J, Jorge J A, François J M, Terenzi H F. Effects of heat shock on the level of trehalose and glycogen, and on the induction of thermotolerance in Neurospora crassa. FEBS Lett. 1991;283:19–22. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80544-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Piper P, Curran M, Davies A, Lockheart A, Reid G. Transcription of the phosphoglycerate kinase gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae increases when fermentative cultures are stressed by heat shock. Eur J Biochem. 1986;161:525–531. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb10474.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Piper P W. Molecular events associated with acquisition of heat tolerance by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1993;11:339–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1993.tb00005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sanchez Y, Taulein J, Borkovich K A, Lindquist S. Hsp 104 is required for tolerance to many forms of stress. EMBO J. 1992;11:2357–2364. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05295.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Travassos L R R G, Cury A. Thermophilic enteric yeasts. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1971;25:49–74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.25.100171.000405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Trent J D, Gabrielsen M, Jensen B, Neuhard J, Olsen J. Acquired thermotolerance and heat shock proteins in thermophiles from the three phylogenetic domains. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:6148–6152. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.19.6148-6152.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.van der Walt J P, Yarrow D. The genus Arxiozyma gen. nov. (Saccharomycetaceae) S African J Bot. 1984;3:340–342. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.van Eden W, Young D B, editors. Stress proteins in medicine. New York, N.Y: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Watson K. Temperature relations. In: Rose A H, Harrison J S, editors. The yeasts. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press; 1987. pp. 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Watson K. Microbial stress proteins. Adv Microb Physiol. 1990;31:183–223. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60122-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Watson K, Arthur H, Blakey M. Biochemical correlations among the thermophilic enteric yeasts Torulopsis pintolopesii, Saccharomyces telluris, and Candida slooffii. J Bacteriol. 1980;143:693–702. doi: 10.1128/jb.143.2.693-702.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Watson K, Arthur H, Morton H. Thermal adaptation in yeast: obligate psychrophiles are obligate aerobes and obligate thermophiles are facultative anaerobes. J Bacteriol. 1978;136:815–817. doi: 10.1128/jb.136.2.815-817.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Watson K, Dunlop G, Cavicchioli R. Mitochondrial and cytoplasmic protein syntheses are not required for heat shock acquisition of ethanol and thermotolerance in yeast. FEBS Lett. 1984;172:299–302. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(84)81145-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Weitzel G, Pilatus U, Rensing L. The cytoplasmic pH, ATP content and total protein synthesis rate during heat-shock protein inducing treatments in yeast. Exp Cell Res. 1987;170:64–79. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(87)90117-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES