Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 25;37(12):2346–2355. doi: 10.1038/s41375-023-02042-4

Table 3.

Overview of results – Tisagenlecleucel vs. SOC.

Tisagenlecleucel vs. SOC
FAS Naïve comparison Adjusted comparison
N(Tisagenlecleucel) = 209 N(Tisagenlecleucel) = 201
N(SOC) = 302 N(SOC) = 273
OS 0.38 (0.29–0.49); <0.001 0.47 (0.35–0.62); <0.001
Univariate Cox-Regression
HR (95 % CI); p-value
Defined as the time from the date of treatment start to the date of death due to any cause.
ORR* 4.95 (3.30–7.43); <0.001 3.34 (2.14–5.19); <0.001
Logistic Regression
OR (95% CI)
Defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall disease response of CR or CRi.
EFSa* 0.67 (0.52–0.86); 0.001 n.a.
Univariate Cox-Regression
HR (95 % CI); p-value
Defined as the time from the date of treatment start to the date of relapse, death due to any cause after remission or treatment failure, whatever occurs first.
RFSb 0.77 (0.51–1.18); 0.233 n.a.
Univariate Cox-Regression
HR (95 % CI); p-value
Defined as time from achievement of CR or CRi whatever occurs first to date of relapse or death due to any cause during CR or CRi.
ITT Naïve comparison Adjusted comparison
N(Tisagenlecleucel) = 243 N(Tisagenlecleucel) = 236
N(SOC) = 302 N(SOC) = 281
OS 0.44 (0.34–0.56); <0.001 0.54 (0.41–0.71); <0.001
Univariate Cox-Regression
HR (95% CI); p-value
SOC: Defined as the time from the date of treatment start to the date of death due to any cause
Tisagenlecleucel: Defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the date of death due to any cause.
ORR* 2.76 (1.94–3.94); <0.001 1.99 (1.33–2.97); <0.001
Logistic Regression
OR (95% CI)
Defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall disease response of CR or CRi.

CI Confidence interval, CR Complete remission, CRi CR with incomplete blood count recovery, EFS Event-free survival, FAS Full analysis set, HR Hazard ratio, ITT Intention to treat, n.a. not available, OR Odds ratio, ORR Overall remission rate, OS Overall survival, RFS Relapse-free survival, SOC Standard of care.

aData not available in the GMALL dataset (Frankfurt). Patients from this registry were included but censored at day 1.

bOnly data from the ALL-REZ BFM registry (Berlin) was included.

*missings SOC, naïve N = 3.

p-value: based on Log-Rank Test; p-value (ORR): based on Z-test.