Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 28;30(6):2736–2749. doi: 10.1007/s12350-023-03358-5

Table 2.

The impact of motion correction on the interpretation of cardiac 15O-water PET results in 170 scans with simulated motion, based on a 2.3 mL⋅min−1⋅g−1 threshold for MBFstress

Pre-analysis approach Post-analysis approach
Changed (#) True (#) Changed (#) True (#)
Global Positive to negative 5 4 2 2
Negative to positive 17 2 15 4
LAD Positive to negative 5 5 5 5
Negative to positive 11 10 12 10
RCA Positive to negative 14 4 2 2
Negative to positive 24 4 16 3
LCx Positive to negative 9 5 2 1
Negative to positive 15 6 12 4
Any Positive to negative 29 15 8 7
Negative to positive 40 18 38 16

Based on changes in MBF globally or in any of the coronary territories, motion correction using the pre-analysis approach altered the interpretation of 69 scans, while using the post-analysis approach, the interpretation was altered in 46. The change in interpretation was considered true, if the post-motion correction interpretation agreed with the interpretation of the original motion-free scan