Table 6.
Studies addressing detrusor overactivity (DO) in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP)
Number of studies | Reference numbers of the studies | |
---|---|---|
Method of assessing for DO | ||
Urodynamics (cystometry) | 8 | (44–46, 51–55) |
Trabeculations on cystoscopy | 1 | (47) |
Artificial neural network analysis | 1 | (56) |
Aim of assessing for DOa | ||
Assessment for DO as co-morbidity with POP | 3 | (46, 47, 56) |
Assessing the value of urodynamics in patients with POP | 5 | (44, 45, 52, 53, 55) |
Assessment for risk factors predicting DO post-repair | 3 | (44, 51, 54) |
Prolapse reduction during assessment | 2 | (46, 54) |
aSome papers had more than one aim and were included in more than one group