Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 1;30(6):2750–2759. doi: 10.1007/s12350-023-03359-4

Table 2.

Survival models through Cox proportional hazards utilizing clinical variables, ML-derived scores and comparator predictors (CCTA statistical score by De Graaf and Calcium Score)

Predictors HR 95% CI P value
Hybridized ML model
 Age 1.02 .97–1.06 .360
 Smoking .95 .41–2.18 .897
 Diabetes 1.06 .69–1.62 .772
 Hypertension 1.03 .48–2.18 .934
 Dyslipidemia .71 .33–1.50 .376
 ML-CCTA 15.26 5.38–43.25 < .0001
 ML-PET 4.23 1.99–8.98 .0002
Expert-based model
 Age 1.03 .99–1.08 .129
 Smoking 1.48 .69–3.16 .311
 Diabetes 1.33 .86–2.06 .195
 HTN 1.12 .51–2.40 .775
 DLP .71 .33–1.53 .388
 Statistical CCTA score 1.10 1.04–1.15 .0006
 Clinical PET 1.02 .58–1.77 .947
Calcium score-based model
 Calcium score 1.16 1.03–1.30 .0012

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio