Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 27;6:221. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00961-1

Fig. 4. Influence of adjusting for treatment-affected time-varying confounding.

Fig. 4

Treatment effect estimates adjusted only for baseline confounding versus adjusted for baseline and treatment-affected time-varying confounding (TTC) reported by sixteen of the included studies. Treatment effects were reported in terms of odds or hazard ratios (including the reported 95% CIs). In three studies (A), the point estimates moved to the opposite direction, in two (B) and eight (C) studies, the estimates moved away from and towards the null hypothesis, respectively. In three studies (D), there was a marginal difference in point estimates. Pouwels et al. (2020) estimated treatment effect on length-of-stay (in terms of days) by adjusting for baseline confounding and by adjusting for baseline confounding and TTC, and found a marginal difference in point estimates. *Khanal et al. (2012) compared prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy with two different alternative treatments.