Table 1.
Control n = 8 |
Sham n = 8 |
MI‐1W n = 24 |
|
---|---|---|---|
HR (b.p.m.) | 476.36 ± 4.26 | 492.34 ± 6.22 | 481.22 ± 6.23 |
IVSd (mm) | 1.63 ± 0.02 | 1.60 ± 0.07 | 1.49 ± 0.28* |
LVDd (mm) | 6.37 ± 0.84 | 6.32 ± 0.72 | 8.47 ± 0.84* |
LVDs (mm) | 3.48 ± 0.32 | 3.32 ± 0.27 | 6.42 ± 0.68* |
LVPWd (mm) | 171 ± 0.09 | 1.63 ± 0.07 | 1.55 ± 0.13 |
EF (%) | 80.68 ± 0.81 | 82 ± 2.27 | 46.57 ± 3.38* |
FS (%) | 44.30 ± 0.83 | 42.58 ± 0.72 | 19.31 ± 1.09* |
E/e′ | 11.50 ± 1.63 | 12.37 ± 1.73 | 19.39 ± 2.14* |
E/e′, the ratio of mitral valve flow in early diastole and peak annulus motion velocity; EF, ejection fraction; FS, left ventricular short‐axis shortening; HR, heart rate; IVSd, ventricular septal end‐diastolic thickness; LVDd, left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter; LVDs, left ventricular end‐systolic diameter; LVPWd, left ventricular posterior wall end‐diastolic thickness; MI, myocardial infarction.
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
p < 0.05 vs. sham group.