Table 5.

Implementation of a peer-led web-based platform (PWP).

Implementation considerations		Residents (n=51), n (%)	Fellows (n=29), n (%)	All trainees (n=80), n (%)
Amount willing to spend for a PWP application, CAD $ (US $)a
	Nothing	9 (18)	1 (3)	10 (13)
	<1 (0.72)	0 (0)	2 (7)	2 (3)
	1 (0.72)-5 (3.60)	9 (18)	3 (10)	12 (15)
	5 (3.60)-10 (7.20)	10 (20)	6 (21)	16 (20)
	11 (7.92)-20 (14.40)	6 (12)	10 (35)	16 (20)
	21 (15.12)-30 (21.60)	8 (16)	0 (0)	8 (10)
	31 (21.60)-50 (36)	4 (8)	5 (17)	9 (11)
	>50 (36)	5 (10)	2 (7)	7 (9)
Likelihood of accessing peer contact information
	Not likely	2 (4)	1 (3)	3 (4)
	Somewhat unlikely	6 (12)	0 (0)	6 (8)
	Maybe	13 (26)	12 (41)	25 (31)
	Somewhat likely	15 (29)	8 (28)	23 (29)
	Very likely	15 (29)	8 (28)	23 (29)
Likelihood of contributing to a resident or fellow guidebook
	Not likely	4 (8)	1 (3)	5 (6)
	Somewhat unlikely	5 (10)	1 (3)	6 (8)
	Maybe	13 (26)	12 (41)	25 (31)
	Somewhat likely	14 (28)	8 (28)	22 (28)
	Very likely	15 (29)	7 (24)	22 (28)
Likelihood to write forum articles for fellow peers
	Not likely	19 (37)	3 (10)	22 (28)
	Somewhat unlikely	13 (26)	4 (14)	17 (21)
	Maybe	10 (20)	13 (45)	23 (29)
	Somewhat likely	5 (10)	8 (28)	13 (16)
	Very likely	4 (8)	1 (3)	5 (6)
Likelihood to share notes or documents
	Not likely	3 (6)	2 (7)	5 (6)
	Somewhat unlikely	2 (4)	0 (0)	2 (3)
	Maybe	4 (8)	5 (17)	9 (11)
	Somewhat likely	10 (20)	15 (52)	25 (31)
	Very likely	32 (63)	7 (24)	39 (49)
Barriers to a PWP site
	Poor engagement from peers	19 (37)	15 (52)	34 (43)
	Poor resource quality	13 (26)	5 (17)	18 (23)
	No time	4 (8)	3 (10)	7 (9)
	Privacy concerns	3 (6)	0 (0)	3 (4)
	No barriers	12 (24)	6 (21)	18 (23)

^aA currency exchange rate of CAD $1=US $0.72 was applicable.