Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2023 Jul 7;8(4):966–973. doi: 10.1177/23969873231185895

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© European Stroke Organisation 2023

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 2. — Visual acuity at baseline and follow-up. VA of each individual patient at baseline and follow up (a and b). Please note that data from more than one patient with similar VA course may overlay. IVT patients as well as non-IVT patients had a significantly improved VA at follow-up compared to baseline (∆VA 0.5 ± 0.8, p < 0.001) for IVT patients, ∆VA 0.40 ± 1.1, p < 0.05 for non-IVT patients). When comparing the ∆VA (c) and number of patients with visual recovery at follow-up (d), no significant differences between IVT and non-IVT patients were found (∆VA 0.5 ± 0.8 for the IVT group vs 0.4 ± 1.1 for the non-IVT group, p = 0.196, 21/47 (44.7%) IVT patients with visual recovery vs 13/34 (38.2%) non-IVT patients with visual recovery, p = 0.562). IVT: intravenous thrombolysis; logMAR: logarithm of minimum angle of resolution; VA: visual acuity.