Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 7;12(4):203–210. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_21_23

Table 3a.

Comparison between hysterectomy and hystero-preservation via vaginal route with native tissue (no mesh) for pelvic organ prolapse

Vaginal with native tissue Hysterectomy Hystero-preservation Favor Significant Reference
Recurrence rate 3.66% 13.27% Hysterectomy Significant [21]
Reoperation rate 4.88% 7.14% Hysterectomy NS [21]
Operative time (min) 77 51 Hystero-preservation Significant [21]
Blood loss (mL) 135 46 Hystero-preservation Significant [21]
Visceral injury 1.61% 0 Equal NS [21]
Voiding dysfunction 12.66% 4.17% Hystero-preservation NS [21]
Length of hospital stay NA NA Equal NS [20]
Dyspareunia 5.13% 5% Equal NS [21]

NS: Not Significant, NA: Not available