Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 22;7(22):6913–6922. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011050

Table 3.

Competing-risk regression for transformation to AML in patients with MDS

Characteristic HR 95% CI P value
Autoimmune disease 1.04 0.90-1.19 .631
Immunosuppressive treatment 0.99 0.80-1.21 .892
Age group, y
 65-70 Reference
 70-75 0.86 0.65-1.13 .278
 75-80 0.71 0.54-0.93 .013
 >80 0.55 0.42-0.72 <.001
Female sex 0.83 0.75-0.922 .001
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White Reference
 Non-Hispanic Black 0.81 0.62-1.06 .116
 Hispanic 1.03 0.65-1.62 .901
 Other§ 1.02 0.83-1.24 .868
Rural residence 0.85 0.73-1.01 .06
CCI
 0-1 Reference
 2-4 0.92 0.82-1.03 .125
 >4 0.67 0.56-0.81 <.001
MDS histologic risk
 Low Reference
 Intermediate 2.61 2.09-3.24 <.001
 High 9.49 7.52-11.98 <.001
Transfusion dependence
 Red blood cells 1.71 1.51-1.93 <.001
 Platelets 4.46 3.81-5.21 <.001
HMA (≥4 cycles)# 2.37 2.06-2.73 <.001

Reference group comprises those with absence of autoimmune disease.

Reference group comprises those with absent exposure to immunosuppressive treatment before MDS diagnosis.

Reference group comprises those with male sex.

§

Includes Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and American Indian/Alaska Native.

Reference group comprises those with urban residence.

Reference group comprises those with absence of transfusion dependence.

#

Reference group comprises those with absence of sustained HMA treatment for at least 4 cycles.