Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 8;9(11):e21842. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21842

Table 2.

Quality assessment of individual study.

Study Allocation sequence generation Allocation concealment Blinding Lost to follow-up Calculation of sample size Statistical analysis Level of quality ITT‡ analysis
Leff 1998 B A A 1 Yes ANOVA †
Fisher's exact test
B Yes
Knorr 1998 A A A 2 Yes ANOVA †
Shapiro-Wilks test
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test
A Yes
Noonan 1998 A A A 0 Yes ANOVA †
Fisher's exact
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test
Tukey's modified linear trend test (stepwise trend test)
A Yes
Reiss 1998 A A A 11 Yes ANOVA †
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test
A Yes
Malmstrom 1999 A A A 13 Yes ANOVA †
Dunnet–Tamhane approach,
Shapiro–Wilk statistic, Levene test
A No
Meltzer 2000-1 A A A 4 Yes ANOVA †
Fisher exact test
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test;
A No
Meltzer 2000-2 A A A 4 Yes ANOVA †
Fisher exact test
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test;
A No
Nayak 2002-1 A A A 3 Yes ANOVA †
Wilcoxon rank sum test
A Yes
Nayak 2002-2 A A A 3 Yes ANOVA †
Wilcoxon rank sum test
A Yes
Baumgartner 2003 A A A NA Yes ANOVA † A Yes
Baena-Cagnani 2003 A A A 0 Yes ANOVA † A Yes
Yildirim 2004 A A B 0 Yes Mann–Whitney U test B No
Asthma Clinical Research Centers 2007 A A A NA Yes Huber-White variance;
Linear and logistic regression models
A Yes
Shah 2006 A A A 0 Yes ANOVA † A Yes
Bisgaard 2009 B B A 0 Yes Fisher's exact test B No
Chen 2021 A B B 5 Yes χ2 tests
Pearson correlation test
T test
B No
Prenner 2010-1 B B C 9 Yes NA§ C No
Prenner 2010-2 B B C 13 Yes NA§ C No

A, low risk of bias: the study met almost criteria; B, moderate risk of bias: the study met part or unclear for one or more quality criteria; C, high risk of bias: the study was not met or included criteria; †ANOVA: analysis of variance; ‡ITT: Intention-to-treat; §NA: not available.