Skip to main content
. 2023;24(8):2555–2563. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.8.2555

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Studies Included in the Meta-Analysis

Quality Sex (Male) Mean Age (Year) Sample size Study design Year Author
Fair 103 (51.8%) 61.6 199 retrospective cohort 2022 A Al-Sawat (Al-Sawat et al., 2022)
Fair 43 (52.4%) 59.56 82 retrospective cohort 2000 T Nakagoe (Nakagoe et al., 2000)
Good 865 (55.6%) 63.5 1,555 retrospective cohort 2014 X Cao (Cao et al., 2014)
Fair 391 (52.3%) 60.58 747 retrospective cohort 1986 TB Halvorsen (Halvorsen, 1986)
Good 1532 (53%) 55.64 2891 Cohort Study 2017 JY Huang (Huang et al., 2017)
Good 58477 (55.7%) 62.4 104,885 Cohort Study 2011 H Khalili (Khalili et al., 2011)
Good 955 (59.9%) 59.54 1,620 case - control 2012 Y Urun (Urun et al., 2012)
Good 263 (52.6%) 51.5 500 case - control 1984 MMA Mousseron (Mousseron-Canet, 1984)
Good 4421 (51.3%) 64.56 8,625 retrospective cohort 2021 H Furuhashi (Furuhashi et al., 2021)
Good 714 (54.3%) 59.3 1,314 retrospective cohort 2014 B Li (Li et al., 2014)
Good 461 (60.1%) 65.95 767 retrospective cohort 2021 M Gömeç (Gömeç and Özden, 2021)
Good 663 (51.3%) 60.21 1,290 prospective cohort 2015 W Sun (Sun et al., 2015)
Good 1116 (54.1%) 61.2 2,063 case - control 2012 AS Zhivotovskiy (Zhivotovskiy et al., 2012)
Good 3073 (52.31%) 60.33 5875 prospective cohort 2016 SK Vasan (Vasan et al., 2016)