Table 4.
Induced fit docking (IFD) and MM-GBSA (ΔG bind) calculations of selected compounds on InhAMTB and InhAMAB.
| Target | Ligand | MIC99 (μg/mL) | Docking score (kcal/mol) | Glide Emodel | Glide energy | MM-GBSA ΔG bind (kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InhAMTB | 11b | 25 | −9.215 | −91.212 | −57.541 | −52.00 |
| 11f | 6.25 | −11.078 | −92.364 | −57.319 | −68.57 | |
| TCS | 12.5 | −7.258 | −69.400 | −48.512 | −36.40 | |
| InhAMAB | 11b | 0.78 | −9.893 | −93.578 | −62.647 | −87.59 |
| 11c | 25 | −7.728 | −66.141 | −50.845 | −76.76 | |
| TCS | 3.125 | −8.032 | −50.294 | −37.764 | −72.99 |