Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr;49(4):1381–1390. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.4.1381-1390.2005

TABLE 1.

Comparison of trans-lactam potency in rVV NS3-5 gel-based assay and ELISA using antibodies of different specificitiesa

Compound IDb Gel-based assay end pointc (μM) ELISA IC50 (μM) ± SEd
Vero cell CC50 (μM) Selectivity indexg
Anti-C100 antibodye Anti-NS5A antibodyf
1c <0.3 <1.6 0.4 ± 0.1 124 >78
1d 1 1.2 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.2 144 120
1e <0.3 2.1 ± 0.1 NT 76 36
1f 1 4.6 ± 0.4 5.2 ± 0.6 78 17
1g 1 5.9 ± 0.6 5.4 ± 0.3 270 46
1h 1 NT 6.1 ± 0.6 95 16h
1i 3 7.8 ± 0.7 NT 382 49
1j 3 9.0 ± 1.4 NT 320 36
1k 1 9.1 ± 0.7 8.0 ± 0.6 290 32
1a 3 11.8 ± 0.7 8.3 ± 0.4 92 8
1l 3 NT 13.4 ± 0.9 279 21h
1m 3 NT 15.1 ± 0.7 >500 >33h
1n 3-10 NT 20.3 ± 2.6 331 16h
1o 3-10 67.9 >100 500 7
4 3 >100 >100 >500 NC
1p 10 >100 23.4 ± 2.2 531 NC
1q >10 >100 50.7 ± 13.7 >500 NC
a

Results are ranked according to data from the ELISA using the anti-C100 antibody.

b

ID, identification number.

c

Defined as the lowest concentration at which NS4B is no longer visible.

d

Standard errors were derived from a GraFit software program used to calculate IC50. Compounds were tested once. NT, not tested.

e

8958, from Biogenesis (see Materials and Methods).

f

8808, from Biogenesis (see Materials and Methods).

g

Calculated by dividing the Vero cell CC50 by the ELISA IC50 (anti-C100 antibody). NC, not calculated.

h

Calculated by using the anti-NS5A antibody result.